Skip to content
Project Curia

← All seven reforms

Reform No. 02

Require Dark Money Disclosures

Require any organization spending over $10,000 in an election to publicly identify donors above $10,000.

47%

of Congress documented cosponsoring this reform

250 of 537 members

227 on the current bill, 23 only on a prior Congress’s.

CongressVoters
Democrats
95%88%
Republicans
0%85%
Independents
67%84%

Voter figures: Verasight for the Brennan Center for Justice (an advocacy organization), Apr–May 2026.

Vehicle in the 119th Congress

Related bills not counted

  • Disclosing Foreign Influence in Lobbying Act

    Senate ·S 856

    Strengthens disclosure of foreign-government direction over registered lobbyists; does not require donor disclosure for $10,000+ election spending.

  • Disclosing Foreign Influence in Lobbying Act

    House ·HR 1883

    House companion of S 856, with the same lobbying-disclosure mechanism, not an election-spending donor disclosure bill.

  • End Dark Money Act

    House ·HR 2498

    Named for the problem this reform targets, but a tax-code bill (referred to Ways and Means): it repeals the rider that bars the IRS from writing rules on the political activity of tax-exempt nonprofits. That would clear the way for future IRS disclosure rules rather than itself requiring anyone to disclose donors, so it does not enact the reform's standard of naming the donors behind $10,000+ in election spending.

Also crediting cosponsors of prior versions

What it does

The DISCLOSE Act would require any organization spending more than $10,000 in a federal election to publicly identify donors who contributed $10,000 or more, close the routing loopholes that let money pass through 501(c)(4) and 501(c)(6) groups anonymously, and require shell companies engaged in election spending to disclose their true owners.

Where Congress stands.

Alabama · 1 of 9 supportAlaska · 0 of 3 supportArizona · 4 of 11 supportColorado · 6 of 10 supportFlorida · 7 of 29 supportGeorgia · 6 of 15 supportIndiana · 2 of 11 supportKansas · 1 of 6 supportMaine · 3 of 4 supportMassachusetts · 11 of 11 supportMinnesota · 6 of 10 supportNew Jersey · 11 of 14 supportNorth Carolina · 4 of 16 supportNorth Dakota · 0 of 3 supportOklahoma · 0 of 7 supportPennsylvania · 8 of 19 supportSouth Dakota · 0 of 3 supportTexas · 12 of 39 supportWyoming · 0 of 3 supportConnecticut · 7 of 7 supportMissouri · 1 of 10 supportWest Virginia · 0 of 4 supportIllinois · 16 of 19 supportNew Mexico · 5 of 5 supportArkansas · 0 of 6 supportCalifornia · 39 of 53 supportDelaware · 3 of 3 supportDistrict of Columbia · 1 of 1 supportHawaii · 4 of 4 supportIowa · 0 of 6 supportKentucky · 0 of 8 supportMaryland · 9 of 10 supportMichigan · 8 of 15 supportMississippi · 1 of 6 supportMontana · 0 of 4 supportNew Hampshire · 4 of 4 supportNew York · 20 of 28 supportOhio · 4 of 17 supportOregon · 7 of 8 supportTennessee · 1 of 11 supportUtah · 0 of 6 supportVirginia · 8 of 13 supportWashington · 10 of 12 supportWisconsin · 3 of 10 supportNebraska · 0 of 5 supportSouth Carolina · 1 of 9 supportIdaho · 0 of 4 supportNevada · 5 of 6 supportVermont · 3 of 3 supportLouisiana · 2 of 8 supportRhode Island · 4 of 4 support
None recordedWhole delegation

Select a state on the map, or search for your representative, to see where each member stands.

Find your own representatives →

Share this gap

Download the gap between what voters want and what Congress has signed. Generated from today's cosponsorship data, with the poll and the source on the card, so it stands on its own wherever it lands.

Every card is generated from today's data and carries its source. Take it and post it. You do not need to credit Project Curia. The card already does.