Skip to content
Project Curia

← All seven reforms

Reform No. 02

Require Dark Money Disclosures

Require any organization spending over $10,000 in an election to publicly identify donors above $10,000.

44%

of Congress documented cosponsoring this reform

238 of 536 members

CongressVoters
Democrats
90%88%
Republicans
0%85%
Independents
67%84%

Voter figures: Verasight for the Brennan Center for Justice (an advocacy organization), Apr–May 2026.

Vehicle in the 119th Congress

Related bills not counted

  • Disclosing Foreign Influence in Lobbying Act

    Senate ·S 856

    Strengthens disclosure of foreign-government direction over registered lobbyists; does not require donor disclosure for $10,000+ election spending.

  • Disclosing Foreign Influence in Lobbying Act

    House ·HR 1883

    House companion of S 856, with the same lobbying-disclosure mechanism, not an election-spending donor disclosure bill.

Also crediting cosponsors of prior versions

What it does

The DISCLOSE Act would require any organization spending more than $10,000 in a federal election to publicly identify donors who contributed $10,000 or more, close the routing loopholes that let money pass through 501(c)(4) and 501(c)(6) groups anonymously, and require shell companies engaged in election spending to disclose their true owners.

How members will be scored

Recorded as supporting if they are a cosponsor of the current DISCLOSE Act in their chamber, or voted Yea on a cloture motion in the past three Congresses.

Where Congress stands.

Alabama · 1 of 9 supportAlaska · 0 of 3 supportArizona · 3 of 11 supportColorado · 6 of 10 supportFlorida · 7 of 29 supportGeorgia · 6 of 15 supportIndiana · 2 of 11 supportKansas · 1 of 6 supportMaine · 3 of 4 supportMassachusetts · 11 of 11 supportMinnesota · 6 of 10 supportNew Jersey · 8 of 14 supportNorth Carolina · 3 of 16 supportNorth Dakota · 0 of 3 supportOklahoma · 0 of 7 supportPennsylvania · 8 of 19 supportSouth Dakota · 0 of 3 supportTexas · 12 of 39 supportWyoming · 0 of 3 supportConnecticut · 7 of 7 supportMissouri · 1 of 10 supportWest Virginia · 0 of 4 supportIllinois · 16 of 19 supportNew Mexico · 4 of 5 supportArkansas · 0 of 6 supportCalifornia · 37 of 53 supportDelaware · 3 of 3 supportDistrict of Columbia · 1 of 1 supportHawaii · 4 of 4 supportIowa · 0 of 6 supportKentucky · 0 of 8 supportMaryland · 9 of 10 supportMichigan · 7 of 15 supportMississippi · 1 of 6 supportMontana · 0 of 4 supportNew Hampshire · 4 of 4 supportNew York · 18 of 28 supportOhio · 3 of 17 supportOregon · 6 of 8 supportTennessee · 1 of 11 supportUtah · 0 of 6 supportVirginia · 8 of 13 supportWashington · 9 of 12 supportWisconsin · 3 of 10 supportNebraska · 0 of 5 supportSouth Carolina · 1 of 8 supportIdaho · 0 of 4 supportNevada · 5 of 6 supportVermont · 3 of 3 supportLouisiana · 2 of 8 supportRhode Island · 4 of 4 support
None recordedWhole delegation

Select a state on the map, or search for your representative, to see where each member stands.

Find your own representatives →

Share this gap

Download the gap between what voters want and what Congress has signed. Generated from today's cosponsorship data, with the poll and the source on the card, so it stands on its own wherever it lands.

Every card is generated from today's data and carries its source. Take it and post it. You do not need to credit Project Curia. The card already does.