Elections · U.S. House, District 7 · California
Share this
Raised for this seat
$1.1M
Through June 30, 2026
Cash on hand
$106K
Through June 30, 2026
On the November ballot
Vang faces Doris Matsui for this seat on November 3, 2026.
The ballot as filed by the nominee source, recorded August 27, 2026, not a prediction. Minor-party and write-in filers are on the race page.
Where the money comes from
- Small donors
- 23%$248K
- Large donors
- 72%$777K
- PACs
- 5%$54K
- Party
- --
- Self-funding
- --
- Other
- 1%$7K
Separately, $511K in independent expenditures was reported for and against this candidate by outside committees. That money is not the candidate's receipts and is not part of the mix above.
Receipts reported through June 30, 2026. Source: FEC.
How to vote in California
- General electionNovember 3, 2026In 10 weeks
Register 15 days before, or same-day through Election Day at your county office or polling place.
The district they want to represent
- People
- 764K
- Median household income
- $94K
- Unemployment
- 6.6%
- Living below the poverty line
- 12.8%
- Without health insurance
- 4.9%
U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 2024 5-year estimates. Context about the district, not a statement about any candidate.
Against the field for this seat
Each campaign's reported receipts on one shared scale, in ballot order, not money order.
- Doris Matsui$3.2M
- Robert Morin$30K
- Mai Vangthis page$1.1M
- Zachariah Wooden-
Muted rows are campaigns not on the November ballot; their money is still their own filed record. A hollow row is a candidate with no filing on record yet, not one who raised nothing.
Spending to support them
$511K- National Nurses United for Patient Protection$300K
- Working Families Party PAC$181K
- Justice Democrats PAC$30K
- Palestine American League - PAC$780
Spending to oppose them
No committee has filed independent spending in this direction.
How these directions are decided
Independent expenditures reported to the FEC. The supporting or opposing direction is each committee's own declared filing, not an interpretation, and a group spending against a candidate is not necessarily spending for their opponent. Outside money is not the campaign's money and is never added to what they raised.
In their own words
What Vang's campaign says it would work on.
The priorities Vang's own campaign site lists, quoted as written there. They are what the campaign says. Nobody has voted on them.
- “💰 An Economy for Working Families”
- “Tariff Refunds for Small Businesses & Families”
- “Tax Billionaires”
- “Good Jobs and the Right to Organize”
- “🏥 Healthcare”
- “Medicare for All”
- “Reproductive Freedom”
- “Access for Rural & Marginalized Communities”
- “🏠 Housing”
- “Build More Homes We Can Afford”
- “Take on Corporate Landlords”
- “Proven Solutions for Homelessness”
Quoted from maiforus.com, read August 14, 2026. A campaign site changes; this is what it said on that date. Curia quotes these and does not check, rate or rank them.
Record in office
Vang has not held this office, so there is no federal voting record, no cosponsorships and no committee service to report.
That absence is not a position for or against anything; it is what a first federal campaign looks like in the public record.
Candidates and financing from the FEC, public domain. Nothing here is a forecast, a grade, or a ranking of candidates.