Skip to content
Project Curia

Three ways to watch Congress

Tracking Bills in Congress.

BillsYou are here

What Congress votes on, in plain language, and when a yes bundled unrelated measures together.

Trading

The stocks members trade, including in the industries their own committees oversee.

Financing

Who funds each member's campaigns, the money behind the vote.

When Congress votes on something that matters, we read the bill and say what it actually does. We also flag when a vote was not one bill but several bundled together, because a single yes can hide what a member really voted for. Every claim here is tied to the text of the bill or the vote itself.

Look up a member

The record so far

Every vote we've read.

299
bills decoded
12%
bundled unrelated measures
64
became law
9
voted down

Where every member stands

Every member, by how they voted.

Each dot is one member of Congress, placed by how they voted on the 337 roll-call votes this site tracks. Left to right is agreement with the Republican majority. Up and down is age.

Age204060801000255075100Votes like a DemocratVotes like a Republican

How to read this

Each dot is one member of Congress, placed by how they voted on the 337 roll-call votes this site tracks. Republicans control the House and the Senate, so they decide which bills reach the floor. Every vote here is a vote on a Republican bill. That is why the horizontal axis mostly sorts by who is in power, not by who is open minded.

97%of the time, the average Republican voted with their party's majority
42%of the time, the average Democrat did too, on those same Republican bills
42%of the 337 tracked votes were bipartisan: both parties' majorities agreed
Filters
Chamber
Type
Status
Category

Recent Votes

  1. HR 7008Jul 22, 2026BundledPassed Chamber

    Stop Insider Trading Act

    House vote · 232-198

    Democrats13–198
    Republicans218–0
    Independents1–0

    What this does

    This bill is two unrelated measures voted under one title. The first, the Stop Insider Trading Act, bars Members of Congress, their spouses, and their dependent children from buying individual stocks and other covered investments while in office, requires advance public notice before a covered sale, and sets fees and enforcement through the supervising ethics office. The second, folded in on the floor as the text of the Voter ID Act, amends the Help America Vote Act to require voters to show a valid physical photo ID to cast a ballot in a federal election, provides a provisional ballot when they cannot, and directs states to notify people of the photo-ID requirement when they register to vote. A yes vote endorsed both the congressional stock-trading ban and the federal voter photo-ID mandate together.

    This was not one bill but two. The stock-trading ethics measure and a federal voter photo-ID measure (the Voter ID Act, H.R. 9368) were combined into a single substitute and passed under one vote, so a member could not vote on one without the other.

    How we know: 5 sourced claims
    • Members of Congress and their immediate family are barred from buying individual stocks and other covered investments while in office.Source: Engrossed text, Sec. on Restrictions on covered investments: 'no covered individual may purchase a covered investment.'
    • A covered sale requires advance public notice, and violations carry fees enforced by the supervising ethics office.Source: Engrossed text, Advanced notice requirement + Enforcement (Calculation of fees) sections.
    • The bill folds in a federal voter photo-ID mandate by amending the Help America Vote Act.Source: Engrossed text: 'Title III of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (52 U.S.C. 21081 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 303 the following new section: 303A.'
    • A voter must present a valid physical photo ID to cast an in-person federal ballot, with a provisional ballot available otherwise.Source: Engrossed text, Requirement to provide identification: an election official 'may not provide a ballot for an election for Federal office ... unless the individual presents ... a valid physical photo identification,' plus Availability of provisional ballot.
    • States must notify people of the photo-ID requirement when they apply to register to vote.Source: Engrossed text, Notification of identification requirement to applicants for voter registration.
  2. HR 1118Jul 21, 2026GovernmentStandalonePassed Chamber

    Value over Cost Act of 2026

    House vote · 421-1

    Democrats210–0
    Republicans210–1
    Independents1–0

    What this does

    The bill changes the standard that governs the federal government's multiple award schedule purchasing program. It amends Section 152(3)(B) of title 41 of the United States Code by striking the phrase "lowest overall cost alternative" and inserting "best value." Under current law that provision treats a purchase made through the program as competitive when it results in the lowest overall cost alternative. The bill shifts that benchmark so the purchase is measured against best value instead of lowest cost alone. In short, agencies buying through these schedules would weigh overall value rather than price by itself.

    The bill has a single subject. It carries a short title and one amendment to a single subparagraph of the procurement code, so it stands on its own.

    How we know: 3 sourced claims
    • The Act may be cited as the Value Over Cost Act of 2026.Source: Section 1 (Short title)
    • The bill amends Section 152(3)(B) of title 41, United States Code, by striking the words "lowest overall cost alternative" and inserting the words "best value."Source: Section 2 (Providing best value through the multiple award schedule program)
    • The stated purpose of the amendment is to provide best value through the multiple award schedule program.Source: Enacting clause / long title
  3. HR 6955Jul 21, 2026FinanceStandalonePassed Chamber

    Main Street Capital Access Act

    House vote · 270-155

    Democrats56–154
    Republicans213–1
    Independents1–0

    What this does

    The House passed a broad rollback of bank regulation covering new-bank formation, regulatory tailoring, exams, mergers, funding, and failure resolution.

    Single-subject. Every title amends federal banking and credit-union law and moves in one direction: less regulatory burden and friction for banks, credit unions, and their regulators. The one fiscal provision, a $425 million cut to the Federal Reserve's discretionary surplus fund in Section 803, is a standard revenue offset inside a banking package and is not an unrelated rider. A single yes was a vote on bank deregulation, nothing else.

    How we know: 14 sourced claims
    • The bill shortens the review of new bank charters and makes a de novo bank pilot permanent unless regulators later find harm to safety and soundness.Source: Sec. 101, amending Sec. 908 of the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act: striking '180-day' and inserting '90-day'; new subsection (c)(2) making the authorities permanent unless the Federal banking agencies determine between Jan 1 and June 30, 2031 a significant adverse effect on safety and soundness
    • The bill orders regulators to tailor and inflation-index the asset thresholds that trigger tougher rules.Source: Sec. 201(a) 'Consideration and tailoring'; Sec. 203 new Sections 177 and 178 (periodic adjustments to thresholds by nominal GDP or CPI); Sec. 204 (periodic adjustments to community-bank dollar amounts)
    • The bill raises the Small Bank Holding Company Policy Statement threshold to $6 billion.Source: Sec. 202: revise appendix C to part 225 of title 12 CFR to raise the consolidated asset threshold to $6,000,000,000
    • The bill caps bank exams at 270 days and forces a final examination report within 90 days.Source: Sec. 302(a), new Section 1013: complete any examination within 270 days; provide a final examination report not later than 90 days after the exit interview or additional material information
    • The bill lets well-managed banks and credit unions under $6 billion in assets take limited-scope exams every other cycle.Source: Sec. 303(a)(1) new FDI Act Sec. 10(d)(11) and (a)(2) new FCU Act Sec. 204(h): for well managed and well capitalized institutions with $6,000,000,000 or less in consolidated assets, the next examination after a full-scope exam shall be a limited-scope examination
    • The bill creates a new Office of Independent Examination Review with a presidentially appointed board to hear bank appeals of exam findings.Source: Sec. 302(c) new Section 1015 (Office of Independent Examination Review; Board of 3 members appointed by the President with Senate consent) and Sec. 302(d) new Section 1016 (right to independent review of material supervisory determinations)
    • In enforcement cases the bill lets institutions elect a federal district court instead of the agency's own hearing.Source: Sec. 302(f), amending FDI Act Sec. 8 (subsections (b)(11), (e)(8), (i)(2)(H)) and FCU Act Sec. 206: a hearing before the appropriate Federal banking agency or, on timely request, the appropriate United States district court
    • The bill bars the banking agencies from using reputational risk in supervision, but only if each agency's own study first finds that removing it would not threaten safety and soundness.Source: Sec. 304(c) (study), (d) and (e) (removal and prohibition apply 'If a Federal banking agency determines, under subsection (c), that the removal of reputational risk ... would not threaten the safety and soundness')
    • The bill strips antitrust and competition review from bank mergers that leave the combined firm under $10 billion in assets, provided the deal does not leave only one bank in a metro area.Source: Sec. 601(a) new FDI Act Sec. 18(c)(16), (b) new BHC Act Sec. 3(c)(8), (c) new HOLA Sec. 10(e)(10): for transactions resulting in less than $10,000,000,000 in assets that would not leave only one insured depository institution with a physical presence in any relevant metropolitan statistical area, the agency shall not consider monopoly or lessening-of-competition effects
    • The bill sets hard merger-decision deadlines after which an unanswered application is deemed granted.Source: Sec. 604(a) new BHC Act Sec. 3(b)(1)(C) (grant or deny within 120 days; failure to act deems the application granted); parallel deadlines in Sec. 604(b) HOLA and 604(c) FDI Act Sec. 18(c)(15)
    • The bill raises the cap on reciprocal deposits that escape brokered-deposit treatment from about $96 billion to $250 billion.Source: Sec. 502(a), amending FDI Act Sec. 29(i)(1)(C): striking '$96,333,333,333' and inserting '$250,000,000,000'
    • The bill lets the FDIC choose a costlier bank-failure resolution than the cheapest one when doing so avoids further concentration in the largest banks.Source: Sec. 701(a), new FDI Act Sec. 13(c)(4)(I): the Corporation may select an alternative that is not the least costly to the Deposit Insurance Fund where the additional risk is outweighed by the benefit of limiting further concentration in global systemically important banking organizations
    • The bill reduces the Federal Reserve's discretionary surplus fund by $425 million, effective September 1, 2036.Source: Sec. 803: the dollar amount under section 7(a)(3)(A) of the Federal Reserve Act is reduced by $425,000,000, effective September 1, 2036
    • The Act is single-subject bank and credit-union deregulation, with the $425 million surplus-fund cut serving as a revenue offset rather than an unrelated rider.Source: Table of contents (Sec. 1(b)) listing Titles I-VIII, all amending federal banking and credit-union statutes; Sec. 803 (surplus fund reduction) as the sole fiscal provision
  4. HR 9770Jul 21, 2026EconomicsStandalonePassed Chamber

    FY2027 Continuing Resolution

    House vote · 220-205

    Democrats6–204
    Republicans213–1
    Independents1–0

    Official title: Making continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2027, and for other purposes.

    What this does

    This bill keeps the federal government funded past the September 30 deadline by extending fiscal year 2026 spending rates into fiscal year 2027. It is a continuing resolution. It carries no new full-year appropriations. Instead it lets agencies keep operating at their fiscal year 2026 rates under the same terms as the twelve named appropriations acts that funded them, covering agriculture, commerce and justice, defense, energy and water, financial services, homeland security, interior, labor and health and education, the legislative branch, military construction and veterans, state and foreign operations, and transportation and housing. This stopgap funding expires December 4, 2026, or sooner if Congress enacts the relevant full-year appropriations first. The bill restricts the Defense Department from starting new production, raising production rates, or beginning new projects that were not funded in fiscal year 2026. It adds specific new money above the continuing rate for the Indian Health Service, $75,774,000 for Indian Health Services and $8,296,000 for Indian Health Facilities, to staff recently opened facilities. It appropriates $174,000 each to the survivors of a deceased Representative and a deceased Senator. It blocks the automatic cost-of-living pay adjustment for Members of Congress during the period it covers.

    Single subject in the ordinary sense of a continuing resolution: one vote keeps every named agency funded at prior-year rates. The coupling is inherent to the vehicle, not a hidden rider. Two separable provisions ride along as customary appropriations sections. Section 128 freezes the automatic congressional pay adjustment. Section 127 pays $174,000 death gratuities to survivors of two deceased Members. Both are traditional in continuing resolutions and germane to appropriations, so a yes was a vote to keep the government open on last year's terms.

    How we know: 7 sourced claims
    • This bill extends fiscal year 2026 spending rates into fiscal year 2027 rather than enacting new full-year appropriations.Source: Section 101 (line 16): appropriates 'at a rate for operations as provided in the applicable appropriations Acts for fiscal year 2026 and under the authority and conditions provided in such Acts, for continuing projects or activities... that were conducted in fiscal year 2026.'
    • It is a continuing resolution funding twelve named appropriations acts covering the listed agency areas.Source: Section 101 paragraphs (1)-(12) (lines 17-22): lists twelve fiscal year 2026 appropriations acts, from Agriculture through Transportation-HUD.
    • The stopgap funding expires December 4, 2026, or sooner if full-year appropriations are enacted first.Source: Section 106 (lines 28-29): funds available until the first of enactment of an appropriation for the activity, enactment of the applicable FY2027 act without provision for it, or (3) December 4, 2026.
    • The bill restricts the Defense Department from new production, raising production rates, or new-start projects not funded in fiscal year 2026.Source: Section 102(a)(1)-(3) (lines 24-25): bars new production of items not funded in FY2026, increases in production rates above FY2026-sustained levels, and initiation/resumption/continuation of projects for which authority was not available in FY2026.
    • It adds $75,774,000 for Indian Health Services and $8,296,000 for Indian Health Facilities above the continuing rate to staff recently opened facilities.Source: Section 123(a)-(b) (line 52): 'In addition to amounts otherwise provided by section 101,' rate for operations of $75,774,000 for Indian Health Services and $8,296,000 for Indian Health Facilities, for staffing and operating facilities opened, renovated, or expanded in FY2022, 2026, and 2027.
    • It appropriates $174,000 each to the survivors of a deceased Representative and a deceased Senator.Source: Section 127(1)-(2) (line 55): $174,000 to Alfredia Scott, widow of the late Representative David A. Scott of Georgia, and $174,000 to the heirs of the late Senator Lindsey O. Graham of South Carolina.
    • It blocks the automatic cost-of-living pay adjustment for Members of Congress during the period it covers.Source: Section 128 (line 56): no adjustment shall be made under section 601(a) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 relating to cost of living adjustments for Members of Congress during the period covered by this Act.
  5. HR 8823Jul 20, 2026GovernmentStandalonePassed Chamber

    Putting Patients First by Strengthening Provider Accountability in FECA Act

    House vote · 396-0

    Democrats198–0
    Republicans197–0
    Independents1–0

    What this does

    This bill lets the Secretary of Labor suspend payments to a medical provider who has been convicted of fraud. It amends Section 8103 of title 5, the Federal Employees' Compensation Act, which pays for medical care for injured federal workers. The suspension is discretionary, not automatic, and reaches only providers convicted of fraud. The conviction can involve the FECA program itself, any federal health care benefit program, or a similar state program. Congress directs the Secretary to write regulations to carry it out. The change applies to payments made on or after 180 days after enactment.

    Single-subject. The bill has two sections: a short title and one amendment to FECA on suspending payments to fraud-convicted providers. There is no rider and no unrelated section.

    How we know: 7 sourced claims
    • The bill amends Section 8103 of title 5, United States Code, part of the Federal Employees' Compensation Act.Source: Sec. 2(a) In general: "Section 8103 of title 5, United States Code, is amended"; AN ACT clause: "To amend the Federal Employees' Compensation Act"
    • It lets the Secretary of Labor suspend payments to a medical provider who has been convicted of fraud.Source: Sec. 2(a)(3) new subsection (c)(1): "The Secretary of Labor may suspend payments to a provider... if the provider has been convicted of fraud"
    • The suspension is discretionary, not automatic.Source: Sec. 2(a)(3) new subsection (c)(1): "may suspend payments"
    • The fraud conviction can involve the FECA subchapter, any federal health care benefit program, or a similar state program.Source: Sec. 2(a)(3) new subsection (c)(1)(A)-(C): "(A) this subchapter; (B) any Federal health care benefit program... ; or (C) any State program... similar to such services"
    • Congress directs the Secretary to promulgate regulations to carry it out.Source: Sec. 2(a)(3) new subsection (c)(2): "The Secretary shall promulgate regulations to carry out this subsection"
    • The change applies to payments made on or after 180 days after enactment.Source: Sec. 2(b) Effective date: "shall apply with respect to payments made to a provider... on or after the date that is 180 days after the date of enactment"
    • The bill is single-subject: a short title plus one FECA amendment on fraud-convicted providers, with no rider.Source: Sec. 1 Short title; Sec. 2 Fraud convictions (the only two sections)
  6. HR 4541Jul 20, 2026HealthBundledPassed Chamber

    EARLY Act and SCREENS for Cancer Act

    House vote · 394-6

    Democrats200–0
    Republicans193–6
    Independents1–0

    Official title: To reauthorize the Young Women’s Breast Health Education and Awareness Requires Learning Young Act of 2009.

    What this does

    The bill carries two titles. Title I, the EARLY Act Reauthorization of 2025, extends the sunset of the Young Women's Breast Health Education and Awareness Requires Learning Young Act by striking 2026 and inserting 2031 in the Public Health Service Act, continuing the CDC breast-health education program for young women through 2031. Title II, the SCREENS for Cancer Act of 2025, rewrites the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program in Title XV of the Public Health Service Act. It adds program purposes covering prevention, navigation of care, and reducing disparities in breast and cervical cancer, changes the required program report from annual to once every 5 years, and authorizes $235,500,000 for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2030. It also directs the Comptroller General to report to Congress by September 30, 2027 on the program's reach and any barriers to screening.

    Two separately titled Acts joined in one vote: the EARLY Act reauthorization in title I and the SCREENS for Cancer Act in title II. The coupling is narrow because both concern breast and cervical cancer detection. Title I extends a single sunset from 2026 to 2031; title II rewrites and funds a separate CDC screening program at $235,500,000 a year through 2030. The displayed title names only the title I subject and omits the SCREENS for Cancer Act entirely.

    How we know: 5 sourced claims
    • Title I extends the EARLY Act sunset by striking 2026 and inserting 2031.Source: Title I, Sec. 102, amending 42 U.S.C. 280m(h)
    • Title II authorizes $235,500,000 for the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program for each of fiscal years 2026 through 2030.Source: Title II, Sec. 202, amending 42 U.S.C. 300n-5(a)
    • Title II changes the program's required report from annual to once every 5 years.Source: Title II, Sec. 202, amending 42 U.S.C. 300n-4(b)
    • Title II adds program purposes covering prevention, navigation of care, and reducing disparities in breast and cervical cancer.Source: Title II, Sec. 202, amending 42 U.S.C. 300k
    • Title II requires a Comptroller General report to Congress by September 30, 2027.Source: Title II, Sec. 202(b)
  7. HR 139Jul 14, 2026Science & TechStandalonePassed Chamber

    Sunshine Protection Act of 2025

    House vote · 308-117

    Democrats114–95
    Republicans193–22
    Independents1–0

    What this does

    This bill makes daylight saving time year-round by making today's summer clock the permanent standard. It repeals the section of the Uniform Time Act of 1966 that set daylight saving as a temporary period each year. It then amends the Calder Act to advance standard time by one hour in every US time zone, so the clocks the country now runs only in summer become the fixed standard all year. States and areas that had already exempted themselves from daylight saving time may choose either the new advanced standard time or the standard time in effect before this Act. The House passed it on July 14, 2026.

    Single-subject. Both sections serve one aim: ending seasonal clock changes by making advanced time permanent. Section 1 is the short title and Section 2 carries the operative amendments, the state exemption, and a conforming amendment. There is no unrelated rider. No omnibus divisions.

    How we know: 5 sourced claims
    • The bill makes daylight saving time year-round by making the current summer clock the permanent standard.Source: Sec. 2 heading 'Making daylight savings time permanent'; Sec. 2(a) repeal of the temporary daylight period (line 19); Sec. 2(b)(1) advancing standard time one hour (lines 23-27)
    • It repeals the section of the Uniform Time Act of 1966 that set daylight saving as a temporary period.Source: Sec. 2(a): 'Section 3 of the Uniform Time Act of 1966 (15 U.S.C. 260a) is hereby repealed.' (line 19)
    • It amends the Calder Act to advance standard time by one hour in every US time zone.Source: Sec. 2(b)(1): amendments to the second sentence of section 1(a) of the Act of March 19, 1918 (15 U.S.C. 261), striking each hour offset and inserting one hour less, e.g. '4 hours'->'3 hours' through '11 hours' (lines 23-27)
    • States and areas that had exempted themselves from daylight saving time may choose either the new advanced standard time or the standard time in effect before this Act.Source: Sec. 2(b)(2) 'State exemption', inserting new subsection (b) 'Standard time for certain States and areas' giving the choice between subsection (a) time and subsection (a) time as in effect the day before enactment (lines 28-32)
    • The House passed the bill on July 14, 2026.Source: 'Passed the House of Representatives July 14, 2026. Kevin F. McCumber, Clerk.' (line 34); version tag 'Engrossed in House' (line 2)
  8. HR 1181Jul 14, 2026FinanceStandalonePassed Chamber

    Protecting Privacy in Purchases Act

    House vote · 221-201

    Democrats5–200
    Republicans215–1
    Independents1–0

    What this does

    Card networks and payment processors would be barred from tagging purchases at gun stores with a code that marks them as firearms sellers. The bill prohibits a payment card network from requiring, and any covered payment processor from assigning, a merchant category code that is used only or primarily for firearms retailers or that identifies a retailer as engaged in selling firearms, ammunition, firearm accessories, or firearm components. The Attorney General enforces it: within 90 days of enactment the Attorney General must set up a complaint process, investigate complaints, and on finding a violation send written notice requiring the network or processor to fix it within 30 days, after which the Attorney General may seek a federal court injunction. The bill creates no private right of action and preempts any state or local law regulating firearm retailer merchant category codes. It does not stop a network or processor from complying with laws on dispute processing, fraud, compliance management, data breaches, or transaction integrity. The Attorney General must report to Congress each year on the number and disposition of investigations.

    One subject throughout: merchant category codes that single out firearms retailers, plus the enforcement, preemption, and reporting machinery attached to that single prohibition. No unrelated matter is folded in.

    How we know: 4 sourced claims
    • A payment card network may not require a firearms retailer to use, and may not require a processor to assign, a merchant category code used only or primarily for firearms retailers or that identifies the retailer as selling firearms, ammunition, accessories, or components.Source: Sec. 2(a)(1)
    • A covered entity may not assign a firearms retailer any merchant category code used only or primarily for firearms retailers or that identifies the retailer as selling firearms, ammunition, accessories, or components.Source: Sec. 2(a)(2)
    • The Attorney General enforces the section, must establish a complaint process within 90 days of enactment, must give a violator written notice to remedy within 30 days, and may then seek a federal court injunction; the Act creates no private right of action.Source: Sec. 2(b)
    • Any state or local law regulating firearm retailer merchant category codes is preempted, while networks and processors may still comply with laws on dispute processing, fraud, compliance management, data breaches, and transaction integrity.Source: Sec. 2(c)
  9. HR 8897Jul 13, 2026TransportationStandalonePassed Chamber

    Improving Travel for American Families Act

    House vote · 398-12

    Democrats201–2
    Republicans196–10
    Independents1–0

    What this does

    This bill authorizes the Transportation Security Administration to run an optional pilot program at airports that speeds security screening for adults traveling with children twelve years of age and under. The Administrator may start the program only if it does not compromise security protocols. Passengers would still be screened according to their vetting status under the Secure Flight program, and no one could enter a TSA PreCheck or other expedited lane without a boarding pass showing eligibility. In choosing airports, the Administrator would give priority to those with heavy family traffic and adequate space and staffing. The Administrator would have to brief House and Senate committees on the program within 270 days of starting it, and the program would run for two years.

    Single subject. Section 1 sets the short title and Section 2 establishes the family-travel screening pilot with its security requirements, airport selection criteria, briefing requirement, and two-year sunset.

    How we know: 7 sourced claims
    • The TSA Administrator may establish a pilot program at airports to expedite security screening for adult passengers and accompanying child passengers twelve years of age and under, and may do so only if it does not compromise security protocols.Source: Sec. 2(a)
    • If the program is established, each covered passenger must be screened in accordance with that passenger's vetting status under the Secure Flight program, per 49 U.S.C. 44903(j)(2).Source: Sec. 2(b)(1)
    • Screeners may not allow any passenger into a TSA PreCheck or other expedited screening lane unless that passenger has a boarding pass indicating eligibility for that expedited screening.Source: Sec. 2(b)(2)
    • Local TSA management may open or close checkpoint lanes and reallocate available resources based on passenger volume to maximize security effectiveness and efficiency.Source: Sec. 2(b)(3)
    • In selecting airports, the Administrator must give priority to airports with a high volume of passengers traveling with accompanying children, and must consider airports with adequate space and sufficient personnel.Source: Sec. 2(c)
    • If the program is established, the Administrator must brief the House Committee on Homeland Security and the Senate Committees on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and on Commerce, Science, and Transportation within 270 days of establishing it.Source: Sec. 2(d)
    • If established, the Administrator must carry out the pilot program for a period of two years.Source: Sec. 2(e)
  10. HR 3106Jul 13, 2026Emergency MgmtStandalonePassed Chamber

    Weatherizing Infrastructure in the North and Terrorism Emergency Readiness Act of 2025

    House vote · 400-7

    Democrats201–0
    Republicans198–7
    Independents1–0

    What this does

    This bill orders the Secretary of Homeland Security to develop and run a single preparedness exercise. The exercise must model a terrorist attack on critical infrastructure occurring during an extreme cold weather event, such as a polar vortex, and test the cascading effects on critical services. The scenario must cover how emergency managers, state officials, and private-sector and community stakeholders could mitigate the attack and bolster community resilience, and it must involve coordination with federal, state, local, Tribal, and territorial agencies. Within 60 days of finishing the exercise, the Secretary must send an after-action report to the House Homeland Security Committee and the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, laying out initial findings, plans for applying lessons learned, and any proposed legislative changes. The bill creates no new spending and no authority beyond running this exercise and reporting on it.

    Single-subject. The bill has two sections: a short title and one operative mandate. Section 2 directs one exercise and requires a report on that same exercise. There is no rider or unrelated provision, so a yes vote carried one thing.

    How we know: 9 sourced claims
    • The bill directs the Secretary of Homeland Security to develop and conduct a collective response to terrorism exercise.Source: Sec. 2(a): the Secretary of Homeland Security... shall develop and conduct a collective response to terrorism exercise
    • The exercise scenario must combine a terrorist attack on critical infrastructure with an extreme cold weather event such as a polar vortex.Source: Sec. 2(b)(1) An extreme cold weather event, such as an event caused by a polar vortex; Sec. 2(b)(3) a successful terrorist attack against critical infrastructure
    • The exercise must test cascading effects on critical infrastructure and access to critical services.Source: Sec. 2(a) management of cascading effects on critical infrastructure; Sec. 2(b)(1) with respect to access to critical services; Sec. 2(b)(2) Any cascading effects on critical infrastructure
    • The scenario must address mitigation by emergency managers, state officials, and private-sector and community stakeholders, and bolstering community resilience.Source: Sec. 2(b)(3) mitigated by emergency managers, State officials, and appropriate private sector and community stakeholders; Sec. 2(b)(4) resilience of communities... bolstered
    • The exercise must involve coordination with federal, state, local, Tribal, and territorial agencies and with private-sector and community stakeholders.Source: Sec. 2(b)(5) Coordination with appropriate Federal departments and agencies, and State, local, Tribal, and territorial agencies; Sec. 2(b)(6) Coordination with appropriate private sector and community stakeholders
    • Within 60 days of completing the exercise, the Secretary must submit an after-action report to the House Homeland Security Committee and the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.Source: Sec. 2(c): Not later than 60 days after the completion of the exercise... submit to the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate an after-action report
    • The report must present initial findings, plans for incorporating lessons learned, and any proposed legislative changes.Source: Sec. 2(c): an after-action report presenting the initial findings... any immediate and longer-term plans for incorporating lessons learned... and any proposed legislative changes informed by such exercise
    • The operative text is the House-engrossed version, passed by the House on July 13, 2026.Source: Header version: Engrossed in House; line 26 Passed the House of Representatives July 13, 2026
    • The bill is single-subject, with one short-title section and one operative section covering the exercise and its report; it carries no rider.Source: Sec. 1 Short title; Sec. 2 Exercise on terrorist attack during extreme cold (the only operative section)
  11. HCONRES 108Jun 30, 2026War PowersStandaloneFailed

    Directing Removal of US Forces from Hostilities in Lebanon

    House vote · 189-235

    Democrats187–22
    Republicans2–212
    Independents0–1

    Official title: Directing the President pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities in Lebanon.

    What this does

    This resolution would have directed the President to remove United States Armed Forces from any hostilities in Lebanon by not later than 7 days after the resolution was adopted. It invoked section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution. The resolution preserves security cooperation with the Lebanese Armed Forces and the protection of diplomatic facilities, and states that nothing in it authorizes the use of military force. The House rejected it 189 to 235, so it did not take effect and no removal was directed.

    A single-subject concurrent resolution: one removal directive plus rules of construction that only limit how that directive is read. No unrelated matter is attached.

    How we know: 5 sourced claims
    • The resolution directs the President to remove United States Armed Forces from any hostilities in Lebanon.Source: Section 1 (Removal of United States Armed Forces from any hostilities in Lebanon; Termination)
    • Removal is directed by not later than 7 days after the date the resolution is adopted.Source: Section 1 (Termination)
    • It acts pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1544(c)).Source: Section 1 (Termination)
    • The resolution preserves security cooperation with the Lebanese Armed Forces and the protection of diplomatic facilities.Source: Section 2 (Rule of construction relating to certain activities)
    • It states that nothing in the resolution may be construed as authorizing the use of military force, consistent with section 8(a)(1) of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1547(a)(1)).Source: Section 3 (Rule of construction relating to the nonauthorization of the use of military force)
  12. HR 7128Jun 29, 2026FinanceStandalonePassed Chamber

    TRIA Program Reauthorization Act of 2026

    House vote · 373-15

    Democrats191–0
    Republicans181–15
    Independents1–0

    What this does

    TRIA Program Reauthorization Act of 2026 extends the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program to 2034, raises the certification loss threshold to $10 million for acts in 2029 or later, adds a certification review timeline, and requires annual reporting of acts under review.

    Single-subject. Every section amends the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002. A yes vote carried the extension, the certification changes, and the reporting requirement, all within one program. No unrelated rider is present in the text.

    How we know: 9 sourced claims
    • The bill extends the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program's sunset from 2027 to 2034.Source: Sec. 2 (Extension): Section 108(a) amended by striking 2027 and inserting 2034 (line 18).
    • The Terrorism Risk Insurance Program is the federal government backstop that shares insured losses from certified acts of terrorism.Source: Title/AN ACT: 'To extend the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program' (line 15); the Act being amended is the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 (Secs. 2-5).
    • For an act in 2029 or later, certification requires property and casualty losses exceeding $10,000,000, double the $5,000,000 that applies to acts before 2029.Source: Sec. 3(1)(B): Section 102(1)(B)(ii) amended to read exceed $5,000,000 before 2029, and $10,000,000 for acts in 2029 or any year thereafter (lines 21-23).
    • The Secretary of the Treasury must publish a Federal Register notice within 30 days of beginning a certification review.Source: Sec. 3(2), new Section 102(1)(D)(i)(I): notice not later than 30 days after beginning the process (line 30).
    • The Secretary must conclude a certification review within 90 days of the notice, extendable up to 365 days after the damage occurred when information is insufficient.Source: Sec. 3(2), new Section 102(1)(D)(ii): 90-day period with exception extending up to 365 days following the damage (lines 35-36).
    • A decision to certify an act as an act of terrorism, once issued, is irrevocable.Source: Sec. 3(2), new Section 102(1)(D)(iii): final determination 'shall be irrevocable' (line 38).
    • The Secretary must report annually a list of acts placed under review, with either the final determination or an explanation of why none was issued.Source: Sec. 4 (Reporting): new Section 104(h)(2)(B) requires a list of acts noticed under 102(1)(D)(i), with the final determination or a concise explanation of why none was issued (lines 42-43).
    • The bill makes date corrections and renames the 'Terrorism Insurance Program' to the 'Terrorism Risk Insurance Program' in statute.Source: Sec. 5 (Technical amendments): date strikes/inserts in Section 103(e)(7)(E)(i) (lines 47-52); Section 5(b)(1) strikes 'Terrorism Insurance Program' and inserts 'Terrorism Risk Insurance Program' throughout, and 5(b)(2) does the same in 31 U.S.C. 313(c)(1)(D) (lines 54-56).
    • Every operative provision concerns the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program, with one conforming cross-reference in title 31 for the same program rename, and no unrelated rider.Source: Secs. 2, 3, 4, and 5 each amend the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 (15 U.S.C. 6701 note); Sec. 5(b)(2) conforms a cross-reference in 31 U.S.C. 313 to the same renaming (lines 18, 20, 41, 47, 54-56).
  13. HR 7757Jun 29, 2026CommerceBundledPassed Chamber

    KIDS Act

    House vote · 267-117

    Democrats104–85
    Republicans162–32
    Independents1–0

    What this does

    The KIDS Act creates federal online-safety duties for services used by minors and rewrites the children's privacy law, bundling at least thirteen separately titled measures into one bill.

    This is a bundle, not a single-subject bill. One House vote carried at least thirteen separately titled measures across seven titles: the SCREEN Act (pornography age-gating), the Kids Online Safety Act (platform duties), the SPY Kids Act (a ban on market research targeting minors), the Safer GAMING Act (video-game messaging controls), the SAFE BOTs Act (chatbot rules), four research and education acts (Safe Social Media Act, No Fentanyl on Social Media Act, Assessing Safety Tools for Parents and Minors Act, Promoting a Safe Internet for Minors Act, AWARE Act, Kids Internet Safety Partnership Act), and the Children and Teens' Online Privacy Protection Act rewriting COPPA plus a new data-broker registry. The coupling point is the stated subject: protecting minors online. The measures are thematically related but legally independent, each imposing distinct obligations on distinct classes of company, and each carrying its own short title, effective date, and severability. A member could not vote on the chatbot rules, the pornography age-gate, and the COPPA rewrite separately.

    How we know: 10 sourced claims
    • Sites where more than one-third of the content is sexual material harmful to minors must, within one year, use age-verification technology to identify minors and block them from that material.Source: Sec. 102(1) (covered platform = more than one-third sexual material harmful to minors); Sec. 103(a) (beginning 1 year after enactment, provider shall adopt technology verification measures to identify minors and prevent them from accessing such material)
    • The bill states its platform duties impose no duty of care and require no age verification.Source: Sec. 213(c)(2) (nothing shall be construed to impose a duty of care); Sec. 220 (nothing shall be construed to require age gating or age verification functionality); also Sec. 103(f) (no requirement to submit government-issued ID for the pornography-site verification)
    • Social platforms must keep policies addressing named harms to minors, provide minors and parents with safety controls set to the most protective level by default, run a harm-reporting channel, and undergo annual independent audits.Source: Sec. 213(a) (policies addressing enumerated harms); Sec. 214(a)(3) and 214(b)(5) (default settings set to most protective level for known minors/children); Sec. 215 (reporting mechanism); Sec. 219(a) (independent third-party audit, first within 18 months and annually thereafter)
    • Online video game providers must give parents default-on controls to limit who can message a minor.Source: Sec. 303(a) (safeguards allowing a parent to limit communication between a covered user and other users); Sec. 303(b)(1)(B)-(C) (enabled by default and set to most protective level by default)
    • Chatbot providers may not falsely tell a minor the bot is a licensed professional, must disclose the bot is AI and surface a crisis hotline when a minor raises suicide, and must prompt a break after three hours.Source: Sec. 403 (may not state chatbot is a licensed professional unless true); Sec. 404(a)(1)-(2) and 404(b)(2) (disclose AI status; provide crisis hotline resources when user prompts about suicide); Sec. 405(1) (advise a break after 3 hours of continuous interaction)
    • The bill orders several federal studies and an online-safety education campaign.Source: Sec. 512 (FTC study on social media use by minors); Sec. 514 (report on minors accessing fentanyl); Sec. 517 (HHS/NIH 4-year longitudinal chatbot study); Sec. 522 (amends Protecting Children in the 21st Century Act to create a public awareness and educational campaign)
    • The bill amends COPPA to define teen as ages 14 through 17, extend protections to teens, ban targeted advertising to children and teens, and add a should-have-known knowledge standard.Source: Sec. 602(a)(7) adding para (17) (teen = attained age 14 and under age 18, i.e., 14 through 17); Sec. 602(b)(2)(A) new 1303(a)(1)(B) (unlawful to collect/use minor data for individual-specific advertising to children or teens); Sec. 602(a)(7) adding para (20) (knowledge = actual knowledge or should have known)
    • The bill creates a federal registry of data brokers handling minors' data, with an annual registration fee of at least $22,500.Source: Sec. 612(a) (covered data brokers shall register with the Commission); Sec. 612(b) (Commission shall establish a searchable public registry); Sec. 612(c) (annual registration fee of at least $22,500)
    • The FTC and state attorneys general enforce the Act, and the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has exclusive jurisdiction over constitutional challenges.Source: Sec. 701(a) (enforcement by the Commission as an unfair or deceptive practice); Sec. 701(b) (actions by States via state attorneys general); Sec. 702 (D.C. District Court has exclusive jurisdiction over constitutional challenges)
    • One House vote carried at least thirteen separately titled measures across seven titles, coupled by the stated subject of protecting minors online.Source: Sec. 1(b) table of contents (Titles I-VII); short titles at Sec. 19 (KIDS Act), 101 (SCREEN Act), 211 (KOSA), 231 (SPY Kids Act), 301 (Safer GAMING Act), 401 (SAFE BOTs Act), 511 (Safe Social Media Act), 513 (No Fentanyl on Social Media Act), 515 (Assessing Safety Tools for Parents and Minors Act), 521 (Promoting a Safe Internet for Minors Act), 523 (AWARE Act), 525 (Kids Internet Safety Partnership Act), 601 (Children and Teens' Online Privacy Protection Act)
  14. HR 2478Jun 25, 2026FinanceStandalonePassed Chamber

    Financial Exploitation Prevention Act of 2025

    House vote · 414-2

    Democrats207–0
    Republicans206–2
    Independents1–0

    What this does

    This bill lets mutual fund companies pause payouts they suspect are the product of elder financial exploitation. It amends Section 22 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. A registered open-end investment company and its transfer agent may opt in to the new rules by notifying the SEC. The rules apply only to firms that elect in, and only to non-institutional accounts held directly with the fund. An electing firm must ask each such customer for the name and contact information of at least one trusted adult, retain that information, and disclose in writing that it may contact that person about possible exploitation. An electing firm may then postpone paying a redemption beyond the normal seven-day limit when it reasonably believes the account holder is a "specified adult" and that financial exploitation has occurred, is occurring, or was attempted. The standard hold runs up to 15 business days and may be extended 10 more business days if the firm reviews the matter and notifies the trusted contact. A state regulator, agency, or court may extend the hold further. The bill defines a "specified adult" as anyone 65 or older, or anyone 18 or older the firm reasonably believes has a mental or physical impairment that leaves them unable to protect their own interests. Separately, the bill directs the SEC to report to Congress within one year with recommended regulatory and legislative changes to address exploitation of these investors, in consultation with named federal and industry bodies.

    Single-subject. Every operative provision amends Section 22 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 to address financial exploitation of older and impaired fund investors, plus a directly related SEC report on the same subject. No unrelated rider rides on this text.

    How we know: 9 sourced claims
    • The bill amends Section 22 of the Investment Company Act of 1940.Source: Sec. 2(a) In general: "Section 22 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-22) is amended by adding at the end the following" (line 19)
    • The new requirements are opt-in: firms may elect to comply by notifying the SEC, and the rules apply only to firms that make the election.Source: Sec. 2, new subsec. (h)(1)(A)-(B): "may elect to comply with the requirements ... by notifying the Commission" and "Paragraph (2) and subsection (i) shall only apply to a registered open-end investment company and a transfer agent that have made the election" (lines 25-26)
    • The rules apply to non-institutional accounts held directly with a registered open-end investment company (direct-at-fund accounts).Source: Sec. 2, new subsec. (h)(2): "a customer who is a holder of a non-institutional account held directly with a registered open-end investment company and serviced by a transfer agent (a direct-at-fund account)" (line 28)
    • An electing firm must request at least one trusted adult contact from the customer, retain that information, and disclose in writing that it may contact that person about possible exploitation.Source: Sec. 2, new subsec. (h)(2)(A)-(C): request name and contact info of "at least one individual who ... is ... an adult"; "document and retain the information"; disclose in writing it may contact the person to "address possible financial exploitation" (lines 28-32)
    • An electing firm may postpone a redemption payment beyond the normal seven days when it reasonably believes the holder is a specified adult and that financial exploitation has occurred, is occurring, or was attempted.Source: Sec. 2, new subsec. (i)(1): "may postpone the date of payment or satisfaction upon redemption ... for more than seven days ... if such company or agent reasonably believes that (A) the redemption is requested by a security holder who is a specified adult; and (B) financial exploitation has occurred, is occurring, or has been attempted" (lines 34-35)
    • The standard hold runs up to 15 business days and may be extended by an additional 10 business days if the firm reviews the matter and notifies the trusted contact.Source: Sec. 2, new subsec. (i)(2)(A) "not more than 15 business days" and (i)(2)(B) "extended by an additional 10 business days" with notification and internal review conditions (lines 39-44)
    • A state regulator, agency, or court may extend the hold further.Source: Sec. 2, new subsec. (i)(2)(C) Extension by government: "A State regulator, administrative agency of competent jurisdiction, or court of competent jurisdiction may extend the period" (line 45)
    • A specified adult is anyone 65 or older, or anyone 18 or older the firm reasonably believes has a mental or physical impairment that renders them unable to protect their own interests.Source: Sec. 2, new subsec. (i)(3): "specified adult means (A) an individual age 65 or older; or (B) an individual age 18 or older who ... reasonably believes has a mental or physical impairment that renders the individual unable to protect the individual's own interests" (lines 64-65)
    • The bill directs the SEC to report to Congress within one year with recommended regulatory and legislative changes, in consultation with named federal and industry bodies.Source: Sec. 2(b): "Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment ... the Securities and Exchange Commission, in consultation with the entities specified ... shall submit to Congress a report that includes recommendations regarding the regulatory and legislative changes"; consulted entities include CFTC, CFPB, FINRA, NASAA, Federal Reserve, OCC, FDIC (lines 69-73)
  15. HR 915Jun 24, 2026CommerceStandalonePassed Chamber

    Small Business Technological Advancement Act

    House vote · 414-4

    Democrats208–0
    Republicans205–4
    Independents1–0

    What this does

    This bill lets the Small Business Administration lend for technology. It amends Section 7(a) of the Small Business Act to add a new permitted use, so SBA 7(a) loans may finance business software, cloud computing services, or related technology. Covered tools include those that handle operations, product or service delivery, payroll, human resources, sales and billing, and accounting or inventory tracking. The text names business tools that use artificial intelligence as eligible. The bill does not authorize using these loans for research and development. It does not change the definition of working capital, and it does not declare that earlier 7(a) loans made for these purposes were improper.

    Single-subject. The bill carries two sections: a short title and one amendment to Section 7(a) of the Small Business Act with an attached rule of construction. A yes vote authorized one thing, financing business software and technology through existing SBA loans. No unrelated rider is present in the text.

    How we know: 7 sourced claims
    • The bill amends Section 7(a) of the Small Business Act to permit SBA loans to finance business software, cloud computing services, or related technology.Source: Sec. 2(a), adding paragraph (38) to Section 7(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a))
    • Covered uses include operations, product or service delivery, payroll, human resources, sales and billing, and accounting or inventory tracking.Source: Sec. 2(a), new paragraph (38) 'Access to modern business software'
    • The text names business tools that use artificial intelligence as eligible.Source: Sec. 2(a), new paragraph (38): 'including business tools that utilize artificial intelligence'
    • The bill does not authorize using these loans for research and development.Source: Sec. 2(b)(2), rule of construction
    • The bill does not limit the definition of working capital under the Small Business Act.Source: Sec. 2(b)(3), rule of construction
    • The bill does not declare that earlier 7(a) loans made for these purposes were impermissible.Source: Sec. 2(b)(1), rule of construction
    • The bill carries only two sections, a short title and a single amendment with a rule of construction, and contains no unrelated rider.Source: Sec. 1 (short title) and Sec. 2 (the sole amendment); no other operative sections in the text
  16. HR 7401Jun 24, 2026CommerceStandalonePassed Chamber

    Small Business Lending Fraud Prevention Act

    House vote · 415-0

    Democrats205–0
    Republicans209–0
    Independents1–0

    What this does

    This bill makes Small Business Administration employees sign a conflict-of-interest certification before they touch an SBA loan. Any employee who will personally and substantially participate in originating, reviewing, or approving an SBA loan must certify in writing, before participating, that they have no conflict of interest prohibited under 18 U.S.C. 208 or 5 C.F.R. 2635.502. In that certification the employee must also promise to disclose and recuse if they learn of such a conflict later, and attest that they understand the applicable conflict-of-interest rules. The requirement begins 270 days after enactment. The Administrator must issue implementing regulations within 180 days of enactment. The bill adds no new penalty for a false certification or for failing to certify; it creates the attestation duty and leaves existing conflict-of-interest law in place.

    Single-subject. The bill has one operative section (Section 2), and it does one thing: impose a conflict-of-interest certification duty on SBA employees who work on SBA loans. Section 1 is the short title. There are no riders and no unrelated provisions, so a yes carried only this one subject.

    How we know: 8 sourced claims
    • SBA employees who will personally and substantially participate in originating, reviewing, or approving an SBA-administered loan must certify to the Administrator in writing before participating.Source: Sec. 2(a) In general
    • The certification must state that, to their knowledge, the employee has no conflict of interest prohibited under section 208 of title 18, U.S. Code, or section 2635.502 of title 5, C.F.R.Source: Sec. 2(a)(1)
    • The employee must certify they will immediately disclose any such conflict learned after certifying to their supervisor and recuse themselves.Source: Sec. 2(a)(2)
    • The employee must attest they understand the federal-law and SBA conflict-of-interest requirements applicable to them.Source: Sec. 2(a)(3)
    • The certification requirement begins 270 days after the date of enactment.Source: Sec. 2(a) In general
    • The Administrator must issue regulations implementing the Act within 180 days of enactment.Source: Sec. 2(b) Regulations
    • The bill creates no new penalty for a false certification or a failure to certify; no such provision appears in the text.Source: Sec. 2 (entire operative section, no penalty clause)
    • The bill has one operative section and one subject, with Section 1 being only the short title.Source: Sec. 1 Short title; Sec. 2
  17. HR 6644Jun 23, 2026HousingBundledBecame Law

    21st Century ROAD to Housing Act

    House vote · 358-32

    Democrats191–0
    Republicans166–32
    Independents1–0

    What this does

    This law is a housing package spanning twelve titles. It reauthorizes the HOME Investment Partnerships program and rewrites how housing qualifies for it, raising the home-ownership purchase-price ceiling from 95 to 110 percent and extending eligibility to families earning up to 100 percent of area median income. It reforms federal housing counseling programs. It directs HUD to publish model code guidelines for single-stair, point-access block residential buildings up to six stories. It exempts USDA rural housing built on infill sites from environmental study requirements. It creates pilot programs, including an FHA small-dollar mortgage pilot for loans of $100,000 or less, a whole-home repairs pilot, a temperature-sensor pilot, and an escrow pilot that shields a tenant's rising earnings from rent increases. It raises FHA multifamily mortgage loan limits and the loan caps for manufactured-home and property-improvement financing. It converts the Rental Assistance Demonstration into a permanent program and raises its unit cap from 455,000 to 555,000. It creates competitive grants tied to local housing supply growth, including a $200,000,000-per-year Innovation Fund for fiscal years 2027 through 2031, and adjusts Community Development Block Grant allocations to reward jurisdictions that build more housing and cut those that build less. It lets manufactured homes be built without a permanent chassis and requires states to treat them on par with chassis-built homes or prohibit their sale. It bars large institutional investors that control 350 or more single-family homes from buying additional single-family homes, subject to broad exceptions, with civil penalties up to $1,000,000 or three times the purchase price. It prohibits the Federal Reserve from issuing a central bank digital currency. It relaxes several bank and credit-union rules, including raising the asset threshold for on-site supervisory testing from $3,000,000,000 to $6,000,000,000. It authorizes no additional appropriations.

    A member could not vote for this housing package without also voting to prohibit the Federal Reserve from creating a central bank digital currency. That prohibition, in Title XI, is a monetary-policy measure with no connection to housing. Title IX likewise carries a set of bank and credit-union rule changes, framed as strengthening community banks' role in housing but reaching general banking supervision, such as raising the supervisory-testing asset threshold to $6,000,000,000 and easing brokered-deposit limits. The other ten titles all serve housing: financing, supply, manufactured housing, veterans, program reform, and oversight. The title names a housing bill. The text also carries currency and banking policy.

    Senate vote · 85-5

    Democrats41–0
    Republicans42–5
    Independents2–0
    How we know: 23 sourced claims
    • The law spans twelve titles.Source: Sec. 1(b)
    • It reauthorizes the HOME Investment Partnerships program.Source: Sec. 501(a)
    • It raises the HOME home-ownership purchase-price ceiling from 95 to 110 percent.Source: Sec. 501(h)
    • It extends HOME eligibility to families earning up to 100 percent of area median income.Source: Sec. 501(c), Sec. 501(h)
    • It reforms federal housing counseling programs.Source: Sec. 101
    • It directs HUD to publish model code guidelines for single-stair, point-access block residential buildings up to six stories.Source: Sec. 102
    • It exempts USDA rural housing built on infill sites from environmental study requirements.Source: Sec. 103
    • It creates an FHA small-dollar mortgage pilot for loans with an original principal balance of $100,000 or less.Source: Sec. 105
    • It creates a whole-home repairs pilot program.Source: Sec. 202
    • It creates a temperature-sensor pilot program for federally assisted rental units.Source: Sec. 106
    • It creates an escrow pilot that shields a tenant's rising earned income from rent increases.Source: Sec. 404
    • It raises FHA multifamily mortgage loan limits.Source: Sec. 211
    • It raises the loan caps for manufactured-home and property-improvement financing.Source: Sec. 303
    • It converts the Rental Assistance Demonstration into a permanent program and raises its unit cap from 455,000 to 555,000.Source: Sec. 212
    • It authorizes a $200,000,000-per-year Innovation Fund for fiscal years 2027 through 2031.Source: Sec. 208(e)
    • It adjusts Community Development Block Grant allocations to give bonus amounts to jurisdictions that build more housing and reduce allocations to those that build less.Source: Sec. 213
    • It lets manufactured homes be built without a permanent chassis and requires states to treat them on par with chassis-built homes or prohibit their manufacture, installation, or sale.Source: Sec. 301
    • It bars large institutional investors that control 350 or more single-family homes from buying additional single-family homes, subject to broad exceptions.Source: Sec. 1001(a), Sec. 1001(b)
    • It sets civil penalties for that prohibition up to $1,000,000 per violation or three times the purchase price, whichever is greater.Source: Sec. 1001(d)
    • It prohibits the Federal Reserve from issuing a central bank digital currency.Source: Sec. 1101
    • It raises the asset threshold for on-site supervisory testing from $3,000,000,000 to $6,000,000,000.Source: Sec. 903
    • It eases brokered-deposit limits by creating exceptions for custodial and reciprocal deposits.Source: Sec. 901, Sec. 902
    • It authorizes no additional appropriations.Source: Sec. 1202
  18. HCONRES 86Jun 23, 2026Foreign AffairsStandalonePassed Both

    Iran War Powers Withdrawal Resolution

    Senate vote · 50-48

    Democrats44–1
    Republicans4–47
    Independents2–0

    Official title: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.

    What this does

    This concurrent resolution invokes section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution to direct the President to pull United States Armed Forces out of hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran. It carves out forces the President finds necessary to defend the United States or an ally or partner from an imminent attack. That self-defense exception applies only if the President fully meets the reporting requirements of section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution for any such use of force. The directive also does not apply where military action is explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or by a specific congressional authorization for the use of military force against Iran.

    The resolution is a single operative clause with no divisions, titles, or unrelated riders. Everything it directs concerns removing forces from hostilities with Iran under the War Powers Resolution, so it reads as one self-contained measure.

    House vote · 215-208

    Democrats211–0
    Republicans4–207
    Independents0–1
    How we know: 5 sourced claims
    • Congress directs the President to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran.Source: Resolving clause (line 19)
    • The directive is made pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, codified at 50 U.S.C. 1544(c).Source: Resolving clause (line 19)
    • The removal directive excludes those elements of the Armed Forces that may be necessary to defend the United States or an ally or partner of the United States from imminent attack.Source: Resolving clause (line 19)
    • That self-defense exception applies only if the President complies fully with the requirements of section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution, codified at 50 U.S.C. 1544(b), for any such use of the Armed Forces.Source: Resolving clause (line 19)
    • The directive does not apply to force explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or by a specific congressional authorization for use of military force against Iran.Source: Resolving clause (line 19)
  19. HR 7892Jun 10, 2026EducationStandalonePassed Chamber

    No Aid for Ghost Students Act of 2026

    House vote · 249-172

    Democrats36–172
    Republicans212–0
    Independents1–0

    What this does

    Congress requires the Secretary of Education to screen every FAFSA filed on or after October 1, 2026 for identity fraud and blocks colleges from paying federal aid to a flagged applicant until the applicant's identity is verified.

    Single-subject. All three sections amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to build one chain against FAFSA identity fraud: detection by the Secretary (Section 483), a disbursement gate at the institution (Section 487), and program-review priority for non-compliant institutions (Section 498A). Each section cross-references the same "reasonable suspicion of identity fraud under section 483(e)" trigger. No unrelated rider is carried.

    How we know: 7 sourced claims
    • The bill requires the Secretary of Education to screen every FAFSA filed on or after October 1, 2026, through an identity fraud detection system for reasonable suspicion of identity fraud.Source: Sec. 2(a), new HEA 483(e)(1)(A) (lines 22-23)
    • When a FAFSA presents reasonable suspicion of identity fraud, the Secretary must notify the applicant and each institution the applicant designated in the application.Source: Sec. 2(a), new HEA 483(e)(2) (lines 24-29)
    • A flagged applicant's institution may not disburse federal financial aid until it confirms the applicant's identity using in-person verification, live synchronous audiovisual verification, NIST IAL2-compliant verification, or a Secretary-approved equivalent method.Source: Sec. 2(b), new HEA 487(a)(15)(B)(i) (lines 40-45)
    • The bill makes institutions that show a pattern of disbursing aid on or after October 1, 2026, to flagged students a priority category for program review, unless the institution demonstrates compliance with section 487(a)(15)(B).Source: Sec. 3, amending HEA 498A(a)(2) (lines 48-50)
    • The Secretary must give Congress a written description of the detection system by November 1, 2026, and must evaluate and report on its effectiveness by October 1, 2027, and annually thereafter.Source: Sec. 2(a), new HEA 483(e)(3) (lines 30-34)
    • All three sections amend the same statute, the Higher Education Act of 1965, and operate on the single subject of FAFSA identity fraud, making the bill single-subject.Source: Sec. 2(a) amends HEA 483; Sec. 2(b) amends HEA 487; Sec. 3 amends HEA 498A (lines 18-50)
    • The operative text is the Engrossed in House version, which passed the House of Representatives on June 10, 2026.Source: Version header (line 2) and passage line (line 50)
  20. HR 8464Jun 10, 2026GovernmentStandalonePassed Chamber

    Stopping Fraudulent Payments Act

    House vote · 218-200

    Democrats6–200
    Republicans211–0
    Independents1–0

    What this does

    This bill lets federal agencies pause, condition, or split a payment before it is certified when an official finds the payment carries an elevated risk of fraud or an improper loss, based on a documented fraud-risk indicator. It adds a new section 3337 to title 31 of the U.S. Code. It also lets the Treasury order a certified payment voucher returned within 2 days when the Do Not Pay system flags the payment. A pause must be based on an objective, documented indicator, applied only to the risky portion, and held for the minimum time needed to verify eligibility. Routine, historically consistent portions of a payment are allowed to proceed while only the anomalous portion is held. The agency must notify the payee within 2 days, state the reason, and give the payee a process to contest it. The agency must issue the payment within 30 days of the pause decision, and within 7 days after a payee contest, once it determines the payment is not high-risk. Federal officers are shielded from personal liability for good-faith actions under the section, and a pause does not count as a final determination of eligibility or wrongdoing. Agencies may waive the section case-by-case when a law enforcement authority says it would jeopardize an active investigation. The Treasury must issue implementing regulations within 180 days and report to Congress on the results within 18 months and annually after. The amendments take effect one year after enactment.

    Single-subject. Every provision serves one mechanism: a new authority in title 31 to pause and segment federal payments for fraud review. The conforming amendments to sections 3325, 3527, and 3528 exist only to fit that pause authority into existing disbursing, certifying, and accountable-officer rules. No unrelated rider rides in the text.

    How we know: 13 sourced claims
    • The bill lets an agency temporarily delay, condition, or segment a disbursement request before certification when an official determines the payment presents an elevated risk of fraud or an improper payment.Source: Sec. 2(a), new 31 U.S.C. 3337(a)(1) ("Agency obligation to pause disbursement requests for corrective action")
    • The bill adds a new section 3337 to title 31, United States Code.Source: Sec. 2(a)(1) Amendment ("Subchapter II of chapter 33 of title 31... is amended by adding at the end the following: 3337") and Sec. 2(a)(2) technical and conforming amendment to the table of sections
    • The Treasury may order a certified payment voucher returned within 2 days based on an output of the Do Not Pay system.Source: New 31 U.S.C. 3337(b) ("not later than 2 days after the Secretary makes a determination... based on an output of the Do Not Pay system under section 3354")
    • A pause must be based on an objective documented fraud-risk indicator, narrowly applied to the risky portion, and limited to the minimum duration needed to verify eligibility or accuracy.Source: New 31 U.S.C. 3337(c)(1)-(3)
    • Routine, historically consistent payment amounts are allowed to proceed while only the anomalous or high-risk portion is held.Source: New 31 U.S.C. 3337(e) ("Segmentation of low-risk payments")
    • The agency must notify the payee within 2 days, identify the fraud-risk indicator relied on, and provide a process to contest factual inaccuracies.Source: New 31 U.S.C. 3337(d)(1)(A)-(C) and (d)(2)
    • The agency must issue the payment within 30 days of a pause determination, and within 7 days after a payee contests, if it determines the payment is not high-risk.Source: New 31 U.S.C. 3337(d)(3)
    • Federal officers and employees are not personally liable for good-faith actions under the section, and a pause does not constitute a final determination of eligibility, liability, or wrongdoing.Source: New 31 U.S.C. 3337(g) ("Limitation of liability")
    • An agency may waive any provision of the section case-by-case if a Federal law enforcement authority says the action would jeopardize an active criminal investigation or proceeding.Source: New 31 U.S.C. 3337(f) ("Exemptions for law enforcement activities")
    • The Treasury must issue implementing regulations within 180 days of enactment and annually thereafter.Source: New 31 U.S.C. 3337(i) ("Regulations")
    • The Treasury must report to Congress on the results of paused payments within 18 months of enactment and annually thereafter.Source: Sec. 2(f) ("Report on results of payments paused for further review and corrective action")
    • The amendments take effect one year after the date of enactment.Source: Sec. 2(g) ("Effective date")
    • The conforming amendments to sections 3325, 3527, and 3528 exist only to integrate the section 3337 pause authority into existing disbursing, accountable-officer, and certifying-official rules.Source: Sec. 2(b) (amends 3325(a)(3)), Sec. 2(c) (amends 3527), Sec. 2(d)-(e) (amend 3528)