Elections · U.S. House, District 32 · California
Share this
Raised for this seat
$2.8M
Through July 31, 2026
Cash on hand
$600
Through July 31, 2026
Not on the November ballot
Levine is not on the November ballot for this seat. Brad Sherman and Larry Thompson are.
A primary result is a filed fact about a contest, not a judgement about a candidate. Levine's campaign finance and record below are still their own record, and their committee may still be filing.
Where the money comes from
- Small donors
- 3%$69K
- Large donors
- 68%$1.9M
- PACs
- 1%$19K
- Party
- --
- Self-funding
- 29%$804K
- Other
- <1%$99
Separately, $401K in independent expenditures was reported for and against this candidate by outside committees. That money is not the candidate's receipts and is not part of the mix above.
Receipts reported through July 31, 2026. Source: FEC.
How to vote in California
- General electionNovember 3, 2026In 10 weeks
Register 15 days before, or same-day through Election Day at your county office or polling place.
The district they want to represent
- People
- 762K
- Median household income
- $112K
- Unemployment
- 7.5%
- Living below the poverty line
- 10.5%
- Without health insurance
- 5.8%
U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 2024 5-year estimates. Context about the district, not a statement about any candidate.
Against the field for this seat
Each campaign's reported receipts on one shared scale, in ballot order, not money order.
- Brad Sherman$2.5M
- Christopher Ahuja$48K
- Dory Benami$57K
- Jake Levinethis page$2.8M
- Marena Lin$39K
- Jake Rakov$584K
- Larry Thompson$34K
Muted rows are campaigns not on the November ballot; this page's own row keeps its weight so the comparison stays readable. Showing 7 of 8 funded campaigns; every filing is on the race page.
Spending to support them
$401K- New Era Leadership$401K
Spending to oppose them
No committee has filed independent spending in this direction.
How these directions are decided
Independent expenditures reported to the FEC. The supporting or opposing direction is each committee's own declared filing, not an interpretation, and a group spending against a candidate is not necessarily spending for their opponent. Outside money is not the campaign's money and is never added to what they raised.
In their own words
What Levine's campaign says it would work on.
The priorities Levine's own campaign site lists, quoted as written there. They are what the campaign says. Nobody has voted on them.
- “More Affordable Housing”
- “A Pathway, Not a Roadblock”
- “A Just Transition to a Clean Energy Economy”
- “Shut Down Aliso Canyon and Clean Up Santa Susana”
- “A Future for Every Child”
- “Higher Education”
- “A People-First Healthcare System”
- “Keep La’s Film & Television Economy in Los Angeles”
- “Getting Money Out of Politics”
- “A Diplomacy-First Path for Peace”
- “Home Insurance Reform”
- “A stronger simi valley”
Quoted from jakelevineforcongress.com, read August 14, 2026. A campaign site changes; this is what it said on that date. Curia quotes these and does not check, rate or rank them.
Record in office
Levine has not held this office, so there is no federal voting record, no cosponsorships and no committee service to report.
That absence is not a position for or against anything; it is what a first federal campaign looks like in the public record.
Candidates and financing from the FEC, public domain. Nothing here is a forecast, a grade, or a ranking of candidates.