Elections · U.S. House, District 8 · Massachusetts
Share this
Raised for this seat
$1.3M
Through August 12, 2026
Cash on hand
$220K
Through August 12, 2026
Not on the November ballot
Roath is not on the November ballot for this seat. Stephen Lynch, Robert Burke and Rasheed Nicholas Walters are.
Who is on the ballot is a filed fact about the contest, not a judgement about a candidate. Roath's campaign finance and record below are still their own record, and their committee may still be filing.
Where the money comes from
- Small donors
- 18%$227K
- Large donors
- 77%$986K
- PACs
- <1%$11K
- Party
- --
- Self-funding
- 4%$54K
- Other
- <1%$2.9K
Separately, $302K in independent expenditures was reported supporting this candidate by outside committees. That money is not the candidate's receipts and is not part of the mix above.
Receipts reported through August 12, 2026. Source: FEC.
How to vote in Massachusetts
- General electionNovember 3, 2026
Register 10 days before the election.
The district they want to represent
- People
- 781K
- Median household income
- $119K
- Unemployment
- 5.0%
- Living below the poverty line
- 8.5%
- Without health insurance
- 2.4%
U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 2024 5-year estimates. Context about the district, not a statement about any candidate.
Against the field for this seat
Each campaign's reported receipts on one shared scale, incumbent first and then by name, never in money order.
- Stephen Lynch$910K
- Robert Burke$1.5K
- Patrick Roaththis page$1.3M
- Rasheed Nicholas Walters-
Muted rows are campaigns not on the November ballot; this page's own row keeps its weight so the comparison stays readable. A hollow row is a candidate with no finance report on file yet, not one who raised nothing.
Spending to support them
$302,046- Leaders We Deserve$255,817
- SF Solidarity PAC$24,612
- Indivisible Action$21,617
Spending to oppose them
No committee has filed independent spending in this direction.
How these directions are decided
Independent expenditures reported to the FEC, through August 26, 2026. The supporting or opposing direction is each committee's own declared filing, not an interpretation, and a group spending against a candidate is not necessarily spending for their opponent. Outside money is not the campaign's money and is never added to what they raised.
In their own words
What Roath's campaign says it would work on.
The priorities Roath's own campaign site lists, quoted as written there. They are what the campaign says. Nobody has voted on them.
- “Lower Costs and End Corruption”
- “Affordable housing”
- “Family Affordability & Childcare”
- “Affordable Healthcare”
- “Jobs & Economic opportunity”
- “Reproductive Rights”
- “Immigration”
- “Public education”
- “Fighting for Full Equality & LGBTQ+ Rights”
- “Fixing politics & our democracy”
- “Foreign Policy”
- “Climate & The Environment”
Quoted from patrickroath.com, read August 14, 2026. A campaign site changes; this is what it said on that date. Curia quotes these and does not check, rate or rank them.
Record in office
Roath does not hold a seat in Congress now, so there is no current voting record, cosponsorships or committee service to show here.
That absence is not a position for or against anything.
Candidates and financing from the FEC, public domain. Nothing here is a forecast, a grade, or a ranking of candidates.
Cite this page
The citation names the source data used for this record.