Elections · U.S. House, District 11 · North Carolina
Share this
Raised for this seat
$3.1M
Through June 30, 2026
Cash on hand
$2.2M
Through June 30, 2026
On the November ballot
Ager faces Jennifer Balkcom for this seat on November 3, 2026.
The ballot as filed by the nominee source, recorded August 15, 2026, not a prediction. Minor-party and write-in filers are on the race page.
Where the money comes from
- Small donors
- 18%$556K
- Large donors
- 73%$2.2M
- PACs
- 7%$223K
- Party
- <1%$8K
- Self-funding
- --
- Other
- 1%$21K
Separately, $98 in independent expenditures was reported for and against this candidate by outside committees. That money is not the candidate's receipts and is not part of the mix above.
Receipts reported through June 30, 2026. Source: FEC.
How to vote in North Carolina
- General electionNovember 3, 2026In 10 weeks
Register 25 days before, or same-day during the early-voting period in person.
The district they want to represent
- People
- 758K
- Median household income
- $66K
- Unemployment
- 4.1%
- Living below the poverty line
- 12.6%
- Without health insurance
- 11.9%
U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 2024 5-year estimates. Context about the district, not a statement about any candidate.
Against the field for this seat
Each campaign's reported receipts on one shared scale, in ballot order, not money order.
- Chuck Edwards$940K
- Jamie Agerthis page$3.1M
- Morris Davis$111K
- Christopher Harjes$74K
- Richard Hudspeth$217K
- Jacob Lawrence$43K
- Adam Smith$67K
Muted rows are campaigns not on the November ballot; their money is still their own filed record. Showing 7 of 8 funded campaigns; every filing is on the race page.
Spending to support them
$98- Givegreen United Action$45
- Red Wine and Blue$43
- Sierra Club Independent Action$10
Spending to oppose them
No committee has filed independent spending in this direction.
How these directions are decided
Independent expenditures reported to the FEC. The supporting or opposing direction is each committee's own declared filing, not an interpretation, and a group spending against a candidate is not necessarily spending for their opponent. Outside money is not the campaign's money and is never added to what they raised.
In their own words
What Ager's campaign says it would work on.
The priorities Ager's own campaign site lists, quoted as written there. They are what the campaign says. Nobody has voted on them.
- “Recovering from Hurricane Helene”
- “Making Quality Healthcare Affordable and Accessible”
- “Lowering Costs”
- “Stopping Government Waste and Corruption”
- “Reforming Our Immigration System”
- “Expanding Benefits & Services for Veterans and Military Families”
- “Growing Small Businesses and Good Jobs”
- “Supporting Local Farms and a Healthy Food System”
- “Defending Our Environment and Public Lands”
- “Keeping Our Communities Safe”
Quoted from agerforcongress.com, read August 14, 2026. A campaign site changes; this is what it said on that date. Curia quotes these and does not check, rate or rank them.
Record in office
Ager has not held this office, so there is no federal voting record, no cosponsorships and no committee service to report.
That absence is not a position for or against anything; it is what a first federal campaign looks like in the public record.
Candidates and financing from the FEC, public domain. Portrait: Campaign photo, campaign website (reference use). Nothing here is a forecast, a grade, or a ranking of candidates.