Elections · U.S. House, District 22 · Texas
Share this
Raised for this seat
$206K
Through June 30, 2026
Cash on hand
$23K
Through June 30, 2026
On the November ballot
Nehls faces Marquette Greene-Scott for this seat on November 3, 2026.
The general-election ballot as recorded October 12, 2026, not a prediction. Certified list: Texas Secretary of State; Certified List of Write-In Candidates (Federal, State, and District), including four U.S. Senate write-ins; Independent Candidate Filings for 2026, with each applicant's outcome. Minor-party and write-in filers are on the race page.
Where the money comes from
- Small donors
- <1%$1.7K
- Large donors
- 57%$117K
- PACs
- 42%$86K
- Party
- --
- Self-funding
- --
- Other
- <1%$1.1K
Separately, $141K in independent expenditures was reported supporting this candidate by outside committees. That money is not the candidate's receipts and is not part of the mix above.
Receipts reported through June 30, 2026. Source: FEC.
How to vote in Texas
- General electionNovember 3, 2026
Register 30 days before the election.
The district they want to represent
- People
- 834K
- Median household income
- $111K
- Unemployment
- 4.9%
- Living below the poverty line
- 8.0%
- Without health insurance
- 11.4%
U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 2024 5-year estimates. Context about the district, not a statement about any candidate. These figures describe the district as drawn before its lines changed for 2026; estimates for the new lines are not yet published.
Against the field for this seat
Each campaign's reported receipts on one shared scale, incumbent first and then by name, never in money order.
- Rebecca Clark$52K
- Marquette Greene-Scott$54K
- Trever Nehlsthis page$206K
Muted rows are campaigns not on the November ballot; their money is still their own filed record.
Spending to support them
$141K- Defend American Jobs$141KCryptocurrency industry (Republican-directed)Cryptocurrency industry (Republican-directed)
Spending to oppose them
No committee has filed independent spending in this direction.
How these directions are decided
Independent expenditures reported to the FEC. The supporting or opposing direction is each committee's own declared filing, not an interpretation, and a group spending against a candidate is not necessarily spending for their opponent. Outside money is not the campaign's money and is never added to what they raised.
In their own words
What Nehls's campaign says it would work on.
The priorities Nehls's own campaign site lists, quoted as written there. They are what the campaign says. Nobody has voted on them.
- “America First”
- “Secure the Border and Enforce Immigration Laws”
- “Tackle Inflation”
- “Making District 22 and Texas Affordable For Families”
- “Protect Families”
- “Protect Our Children and Empower Parental Choice”
- “Energy Independence”
- “Making America Prosperous Through Energy Independence”
- “Back Law Enforcement”
- “Fund & Support Law Enforcement”
- “Deliver Results”
- “Support Trever”
Quoted from trevernehlsforcongress.com, read August 14, 2026. A campaign site changes; this is what it said on that date. Curia quotes these and does not check, rate or rank them.
Record in office
Nehls does not hold a seat in Congress now, so there is no current voting record, cosponsorships or committee service to show here.
That absence is not a position for or against anything.
Candidates and financing from the FEC, public domain. Portrait: Campaign photo, campaign website (reference use, candidate's own published headshot). Nothing here is a forecast, a grade, or a ranking of candidates.
Cite this page
The citation names the source data used for this record.