Elections · U.S. House, District 4 · Wisconsin
Share this
Raised for this seat
$2K
Through July 22, 2026
Cash on hand
$5K
Through July 22, 2026
Not on the November ballot
Nath is not on the November ballot for this seat. Gwen Moore and Tim Rogers are.
A primary result is a filed fact about a contest, not a judgement about a candidate. Nath's campaign finance and record below are still their own record, and their committee may still be filing.
Where the money comes from
- Small donors
- 9%$175
- Large donors
- 91%$2K
- PACs
- --
- Party
- --
- Self-funding
- --
- Other
- --
Receipts reported through July 22, 2026. Source: FEC.
How to vote in Wisconsin
- General electionNovember 3, 2026In 10 weeks
Register 20 days before online or by mail, the Friday before in person at your clerk, or same-day at the polls on Election Day.
The district they want to represent
- People
- 725K
- Median household income
- $60K
- Unemployment
- 5.5%
- Living below the poverty line
- 19.6%
- Without health insurance
- 8.0%
U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 2024 5-year estimates. Context about the district, not a statement about any candidate.
Against the field for this seat
Each campaign's reported receipts on one shared scale, in ballot order, not money order.
- Purnima Naththis page$2K
- Gwen Moore$1.1M
- Amy Donahue$18K
Muted rows are campaigns not on the November ballot; this page's own row keeps its weight so the comparison stays readable.
In their own words
What Nath's campaign says it would work on.
The priorities Nath's own campaign site lists, quoted as written there. They are what the campaign says. Nobody has voted on them.
- “Economic Stability & Cost of Living”
- “Government Accountability & Institutional Balance”
- “Safe Communities & Responsible Immigration”
Quoted from nathpurnima.com, read August 14, 2026. A campaign site changes; this is what it said on that date. Curia quotes these and does not check, rate or rank them.
Record in office
Nath has not held this office, so there is no federal voting record, no cosponsorships and no committee service to report.
That absence is not a position for or against anything; it is what a first federal campaign looks like in the public record.
Candidates and financing from the FEC, public domain. Nothing here is a forecast, a grade, or a ranking of candidates.