H.J.Res. 104 · 119th Congress · Public lands and natural resources
Overturning the BLM Miles City Resource Plan
How each chamber voted
Yea from the left, nay from the right, each side by party
Senate · Oct 8, 2025
Roll call ↗52
47
Passed the Senate.
House · Sep 3, 2025
Roll call ↗211
208
Passed the House.
Law 154 days after it was introduced
Public Law 119-48. Each step dated from the congress.gov record
- IntroducedJul 10, 2025
- CommitteeJul 10, 2025
- Passed HouseSep 3, 2025
- Passed SenateOct 8, 2025
- Became lawDec 11, 2025
On the record
- Cosponsors
- 1
- all Republican
- House committee
- Natural Resources
- Lobbying
- At least 9
- organizations named it2025 Q2 to 2026 Q3
What it does
This resolution overturns a Bureau of Land Management rule under the Congressional Review Act, so the rule has no force or effect.
How each member voted
The Senate roll call, passed the Senate, October 8, 2025
Nay unless marked
D · Sen · MD
D · Sen · WI
D · Sen · CO
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Miles City Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment".
This resolution overturns a Bureau of Land Management rule under the Congressional Review Act, so the rule has no force or effect. The targeted rule is the Miles City Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment, issued November 20, 2024, which governs land-use management for that BLM field office in Montana. The resolution cites a June 25, 2025 Government Accountability Office opinion concluding the record of decision qualifies as a rule subject to the Congressional Review Act. Nullifying the plan amendment leaves the prior management plan in place; under the Act, BLM may not reissue a substantially similar rule without new authorization from Congress.
Each stop is a step the bill’s own record states, with the date it happened. A ring is a step not yet taken. A bill becomes law when the President signs it or Congress overrides a veto.
At least 9 organizations named this measure in a lobbying filing. A floor, not a total: they were counted by the client name on 26 quarterly reports filed by 1 lobbying firm and by 8 organizations lobbying for themselves in 2025 Q2, 2025 Q3, 2025 Q4, 2026 Q1, 2026 Q2 and 2026 Q3. An organization that lobbied this measure without naming it is not counted here.
The filings record that lobbying was reported on the measure. The form has no per-bill dollar figure and no field for a position, so nothing here says how much was spent or which side an organization took.
5 of them, in no ranking: National Mining Association; Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership; Nfib (National Federation of Independent Business); Trout Unlimited; Defenders of Wildlife. Listed as filed, in the order the filings were read, and 4 others are not shown. These are not the largest, the earliest or the most active: we keep five names per measure, and the filings give no ranking.
From the LD-2 quarterly lobbying filings published at lda.gov by the Senate Office of Public Records. Read for 2025 Q1, 2025 Q2, 2025 Q3, 2025 Q4, 2026 Q1, 2026 Q2 and 2026 Q3. Our copy holds 24 fewer filings for 2025 Q1, 39 fewer filings for 2025 Q2, 42 fewer filings for 2025 Q3, 33 fewer filings for 2025 Q4, 28 fewer filings for 2026 Q1, 48 fewer filings for 2026 Q2 and 218 fewer filings for 2026 Q3 than the Senate's register counts, so those quarters are the filings we could read rather than every one filed. 2026 Q4 is still inside its filing window, so that quarter is only the filings posted so far.
Congress.gov bill status and cosponsor records; the House Clerk and Senate roll calls; lobbying reports filed under the Lobbying Disclosure Act (lda.gov); the plain summary and provisions are read from the bill text, each with its section.