H.J.Res. 130 · 119th Congress · Public lands and natural resources
Overturning the BLM Buffalo Resource Plan
How each chamber voted
Yea from the left, nay from the right, each side by party
Senate · Nov 20, 2025
Roll call ↗51
43
Passed the Senate.
House · Nov 18, 2025
Roll call ↗214
212
Passed the House.
Law 64 days after it was introduced
Public Law 119-51. Each step dated from the congress.gov record
- IntroducedOct 8, 2025
- CommitteeOct 8, 2025
- Passed HouseNov 18, 2025
- Passed SenateNov 20, 2025
- Became lawDec 11, 2025
On the record
- Cosponsors
- 1
- all Republican
- House committee
- Natural Resources
- Lobbying
- At least 4
- organizations named it2025 Q4
What it does
This resolution overturns a Bureau of Land Management rule under the Congressional Review Act, so the rule has no force or effect.
How each member voted
The Senate roll call, passed the Senate, November 20, 2025
Nay unless marked
D · Sen · MD
D · Sen · WI
D · Sen · CO
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment.
This resolution overturns a Bureau of Land Management rule under the Congressional Review Act, so the rule has no force or effect. The targeted rule is the Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment, issued November 20, 2024, which governs land-use management for that BLM field office in Wyoming. The resolution cites a September 18, 2025 Government Accountability Office opinion concluding the record of decision qualifies as a rule subject to the Congressional Review Act. Nullifying the plan amendment leaves the prior management plan in place; under the Act, BLM may not reissue a substantially similar rule without new authorization from Congress.
Each stop is a step the bill’s own record states, with the date it happened. A ring is a step not yet taken. A bill becomes law when the President signs it or Congress overrides a veto.
At least 4 organizations named this measure in a lobbying filing. A floor, not a total: they were counted by the client name on 4 quarterly reports filed by 4 organizations lobbying for themselves in 2025 Q4. An organization that lobbied this measure without naming it is not counted here.
The filings record that lobbying was reported on the measure. The form has no per-bill dollar figure and no field for a position, so nothing here says how much was spent or which side an organization took.
The organizations named: Nfib (National Federation of Independent Business); National Mining Association; Earthjustice Action; League of Conservation Voters. Listed as filed. They are every client name on the filings counted here.
From the LD-2 quarterly lobbying filings published at lda.gov by the Senate Office of Public Records. Read for 2025 Q1, 2025 Q2, 2025 Q3, 2025 Q4, 2026 Q1, 2026 Q2 and 2026 Q3. Our copy holds 24 fewer filings for 2025 Q1, 39 fewer filings for 2025 Q2, 42 fewer filings for 2025 Q3, 33 fewer filings for 2025 Q4, 28 fewer filings for 2026 Q1, 48 fewer filings for 2026 Q2 and 218 fewer filings for 2026 Q3 than the Senate's register counts, so those quarters are the filings we could read rather than every one filed. 2026 Q4 is still inside its filing window, so that quarter is only the filings posted so far.
Congress.gov bill status and cosponsor records; the House Clerk and Senate roll calls; lobbying reports filed under the Lobbying Disclosure Act (lda.gov); the plain summary and provisions are read from the bill text, each with its section.