H.J.Res. 210 · 119th Congress · Environmental protection
Overturning California’s Ocean-Going Vessel Emissions Rule
How the House voted
Yea from the left, nay from the right, each side by party
House · Sep 15, 2026
Roll call ↗216
211
Passed the House.
Passed the House on September 15, 2026.
Latest action: Received in the Senate
- IntroducedAug 6, 2026
- CommitteeAug 6, 2026
- Passed HouseSep 15, 2026
- Passed Senate
- Became law
On the record
- Cosponsors
- 7
- all Republicans
- House committee
- Energy and Commerce
- Lobbying
- At least 16
- organizations named it2026 Q3
What it does
This joint resolution uses the Congressional Review Act to overturn an Environmental Protection Agency rule under the California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards program covering ocean-going vessels at berth.
How each member voted
The House roll call, passed the House, September 15, 2026
Yea unless marked
R · House · AL-4
R · House · MO-4
R · House · GA-12
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; Ocean-Going Vessels At-Berth; Notice of Decision".
This joint resolution uses the Congressional Review Act to overturn an Environmental Protection Agency rule under the California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards program covering ocean-going vessels at berth. Congress disapproves the rule, published at 88 Fed. Reg. 72461 on October 20, 2023, and the rule has no force or effect. The resolution does nothing else.
Each stop is a step the bill’s own record states, with the date it happened. A ring is a step not yet taken. A bill becomes law when the President signs it or Congress overrides a veto.
At least 16 organizations named this measure in a lobbying filing. A floor, not a total: they were counted by the client name on 16 quarterly reports filed by 2 lobbying firms and by 13 organizations lobbying for themselves in 2026 Q3. An organization that lobbied this measure without naming it is not counted here.
The filings record that lobbying was reported on the measure. The form has no per-bill dollar figure and no field for a position, so nothing here says how much was spent or which side an organization took.
5 of them, in no ranking: Sierra Club; Ocean Conservancy; League of Conservation Voters; Phillips 66; Chamber of Commerce of the U.S.A. Listed as filed, in the order the filings were read, and 11 others are not shown. These are not the largest, the earliest or the most active: we keep five names per measure, and the filings give no ranking.
From the LD-2 quarterly lobbying filings published at lda.gov by the Senate Office of Public Records. Read for 2025 Q1, 2025 Q2, 2025 Q3, 2025 Q4, 2026 Q1, 2026 Q2 and 2026 Q3. Our copy holds 25 fewer filings for 2025 Q1, 41 fewer filings for 2025 Q2, 43 fewer filings for 2025 Q3, 34 fewer filings for 2025 Q4, 29 fewer filings for 2026 Q1, 50 fewer filings for 2026 Q2 and 228 fewer filings for 2026 Q3 than the Senate's register counts, so those quarters are the filings we could read rather than every one filed. 2026 Q4 is still inside its filing window, so that quarter is only the filings posted so far.
Congress.gov bill status and cosponsor records; the House Clerk and Senate roll calls; lobbying reports filed under the Lobbying Disclosure Act (lda.gov); the plain summary and provisions are read from the bill text, each with its section.