Skip to content
Project Curia
Supreme Court decisions
No. 23-980Nov 22, 2024Finance and Financial SectorCertiorari dismissed as improvidently granted

The question

Whether the Court would resolve the securities-disclosure question it had granted review on in Facebook, Inc. v. Amalgamated Bank.

Facebook, Inc. v. Amalgamated Bank

What the Court decided

The Court dismissed the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted, leaving the Ninth Circuit's decision in place. No merits question was resolved. The Court gave no reasons beyond the dismissal itself.

How the justices split

Dismissed
In favor 9
Roberts
Thomas
Alito
Sotomayor
Kagan
Gorsuch
Kavanaugh
Barrett
Jackson

Per curiam (unsigned)

Delivered by the Court

The Court dismissed the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted, leaving the Ninth Circuit's judgment undisturbed and resolving no merits question. No reasoning was stated.

How we know · 5 sourced claims
  • The writ of certiorari was dismissed as improvidently granted.

    Source: syllabus, Held

  • The decision was issued per curiam.

    Source: syllabus, lineup

  • The case came on petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

    Source: syllabus, Held

  • The case was argued November 6, 2024, and decided November 22, 2024.

    Source: syllabus, Held

  • The Ninth Circuit decision below is reported at 87 F. 4th 934.

    Source: syllabus, Held

Read the opinion on supremecourt.gov