Elections · U.S. House, District 1 · Arizona
Share this
Raised for this seat
$1.8M
Through July 1, 2026
Cash on hand
$402K
Through July 1, 2026
On the November ballot
Shah faces Jay Feely for this seat on November 3, 2026.
The ballot as filed by the nominee source, recorded August 27, 2026, not a prediction. Minor-party and write-in filers are on the race page.
Where the money comes from
- Small donors
- 11%$205K
- Large donors
- 54%$989K
- PACs
- 8%$146K
- Party
- --
- Self-funding
- 24%$431K
- Other
- 3%$59K
Separately, $384K in independent expenditures was reported for and against this candidate by outside committees. That money is not the candidate's receipts and is not part of the mix above.
Receipts reported through July 1, 2026. Source: FEC.
How to vote in Arizona
- General electionNovember 3, 2026In 10 weeks
Register 29 days before the election.
The district they want to represent
- People
- 805K
- Median household income
- $100K
- Unemployment
- 4.0%
- Living below the poverty line
- 8.7%
- Without health insurance
- 7.7%
U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 2024 5-year estimates. Context about the district, not a statement about any candidate.
Against the field for this seat
Each campaign's reported receipts on one shared scale, in ballot order, not money order.
- Joseph Chaplik$605K
- Jay Feely$2.5M
- Marlene Galan-Woods$2.2M
- Rick McCartney$1.3M
- Amish Shahthis page$1.8M
- Jonathan Treble$4.0M
- John Trobough$1.2M
Muted rows are campaigns not on the November ballot; their money is still their own filed record. Showing 7 of 10 funded campaigns; every filing is on the race page.
Spending to support them
$97K- Physician Voices United$69K
- Healthcare for Action PAC$18K
- SEIU COPE$7K
- Western States Regional Council of Carpenters Legislative Improvement Cmte United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America$4K
Spending to oppose them
$286K- Pro-Choice Majority Action$196K
- Crush Maga PAC$90K
How these directions are decided
Independent expenditures reported to the FEC. The supporting or opposing direction is each committee's own declared filing, not an interpretation, and a group spending against a candidate is not necessarily spending for their opponent. Outside money is not the campaign's money and is never added to what they raised.
In their own words
What Shah's campaign says it would work on.
The priorities Shah's own campaign site lists, quoted as written there. They are what the campaign says. Nobody has voted on them.
- “Economy”
- “Lowering Costs for Arizonans”
- “Standing with our seniors”
- “Protecting Social Security and Medicare”
- “Healthcare”
- “Education”
- “Every kid deserves a real chance”
- “Public Safety”
- “Keeping communities safe”
- “Democracy”
- “Protecting Our Democracy Against Attacks”
- “Civil Society”
Quoted from amishforarizona.com, read August 14, 2026. A campaign site changes; this is what it said on that date. Curia quotes these and does not check, rate or rank them.
Record in office
Shah has not held this office, so there is no federal voting record, no cosponsorships and no committee service to report.
That absence is not a position for or against anything; it is what a first federal campaign looks like in the public record.
Candidates and financing from the FEC, public domain. Portrait: Gage Skidmore via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0. Nothing here is a forecast, a grade, or a ranking of candidates.