Elections · U.S. House, District 13 · Georgia
Share this
Raised for this seat
$522K
Through June 30, 2026
Cash on hand
$16K
Through June 30, 2026
Not on the November ballot
Scott holds this seat, but is not on the November ballot for it. Jasmine Clark and Jonathan Chavez are.
A primary result is a filed fact about a contest, not a judgement about a candidate. Scott's campaign finance and record below are still their own record, and their committee may still be filing.
Where the money comes from
- Small donors
- <1%$1K
- Large donors
- 5%$24K
- PACs
- 59%$309K
- Party
- --
- Self-funding
- 36%$188K
- Other
- <1%$3
Separately, $56K in independent expenditures was reported for and against this candidate by outside committees. That money is not the candidate's receipts and is not part of the mix above.
Receipts reported through June 30, 2026. Source: FEC.
How to vote in Georgia
- General electionNovember 3, 2026In 10 weeks
Register 29 days before the election.
The district they want to represent
- People
- 795K
- Median household income
- $81K
- Unemployment
- 5.6%
- Living below the poverty line
- 11.7%
- Without health insurance
- 13.1%
U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 2024 5-year estimates. Context about the district, not a statement about any candidate.
Against the field for this seat
Each campaign's reported receipts on one shared scale, in ballot order, not money order.
- David Scottthis page$522K
- Everton Blair$875K
- Jasmine Clark$1.6M
- Emanuel Jones$436K
- Heavenly Kimes$908K
- Carlos Moore$113K
- Pierre Whatley$66K
Muted rows are campaigns not on the November ballot; this page's own row keeps its weight so the comparison stays readable. Showing 7 of 10 funded campaigns; every filing is on the race page.
Spending to support them
No committee has filed independent spending in this direction.
Spending to oppose them
$56K- Protect Progress$56KCryptocurrency industry (Democratic-directed)Cryptocurrency industry (Democratic-directed)
How these directions are decided
Independent expenditures reported to the FEC. The supporting or opposing direction is each committee's own declared filing, not an interpretation, and a group spending against a candidate is not necessarily spending for their opponent. Outside money is not the campaign's money and is never added to what they raised.
In their own words
What Scott's campaign says it would work on.
The priorities Scott's own campaign site lists, quoted as written there. They are what the campaign says. Nobody has voted on them.
- “Financial Reform”
- “Employment and Job Fairs”
- “Healthcare”
- “Veterans”
- “Education”
- “Gun Safety”
Quoted from votedavidscott.com, read August 14, 2026. A campaign site changes; this is what it said on that date. Curia quotes these and does not check, rate or rank them.
Record in office
Scott has not held this office, so there is no federal voting record, no cosponsorships and no committee service to report.
That absence is not a position for or against anything; it is what a first federal campaign looks like in the public record.
Candidates and financing from the FEC, public domain. Portrait: Wikimedia Commons, see Commons. Nothing here is a forecast, a grade, or a ranking of candidates.