Elections · U.S. House, District 13 · Georgia
Share this
Raised for this seat
$522K
Through June 30, 2026
Cash on hand
$16K
Through June 30, 2026
Not on the November ballot
Scott is not on the November ballot for this seat. Jasmine Clark and Jonathan Chavez are.
Who is on the ballot is a filed fact about the contest, not a judgement about a candidate. Scott's campaign finance and record below are still their own record, and their committee may still be filing.
Where the money comes from
- Small donors
- <1%$1K
- Large donors
- 5%$24K
- PACs
- 59%$309K
- Party
- --
- Self-funding
- 36%$188K
- Other
- <1%$3
Separately, $56K in independent expenditures was reported opposing this candidate by outside committees. That money is not the candidate's receipts and is not part of the mix above.
Receipts reported through June 30, 2026. Source: FEC.
How to vote in Georgia
- General electionNovember 3, 2026
Register 29 days before the election.
The district they want to represent
- People
- 795K
- Median household income
- $81K
- Unemployment
- 5.6%
- Living below the poverty line
- 11.7%
- Without health insurance
- 13.1%
U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 2024 5-year estimates. Context about the district, not a statement about any candidate.
Against the field for this seat
Each campaign's reported receipts on one shared scale, incumbent first and then by name, never in money order.
- Everton Blair$875K
- Jonathan Chavez-
- Jasmine Clark$1.6M
- Emanuel Jones$436K
- Heavenly Kimes$908K
- Carlos Moore$113K
- David Scottthis page$522K
Muted rows are campaigns not on the November ballot; this page's own row keeps its weight so the comparison stays readable. A hollow row is a candidate with no finance report on file yet, not one who raised nothing. Showing 7 of the 11 campaigns that hold the seat, are on the ballot, or have $25,000 raised or outside spending; every filing is on the race page.
Spending to support them
No committee has filed independent spending in this direction.
Spending to oppose them
$56K- Protect Progress$56KCryptocurrency industry (Democratic-directed)Cryptocurrency industry (Democratic-directed)
How these directions are decided
Independent expenditures reported to the FEC. The supporting or opposing direction is each committee's own declared filing, not an interpretation, and a group spending against a candidate is not necessarily spending for their opponent. Outside money is not the campaign's money and is never added to what they raised.
In their own words
What Scott's campaign says it would work on.
The priorities Scott's own campaign site lists, quoted as written there. They are what the campaign says. Nobody has voted on them.
- “Financial Reform”
- “Employment and Job Fairs”
- “Healthcare”
- “Veterans”
- “Education”
- “Gun Safety”
Quoted from votedavidscott.com, read August 14, 2026. A campaign site changes; this is what it said on that date. Curia quotes these and does not check, rate or rank them.
Record in office
Scott served in the last Congress and does not hold a seat now, so there is no current voting record, cosponsorships or committee service to show here. That earlier record is not on this page.
That absence is not a position for or against anything.
Candidates and financing from the FEC, public domain. Portrait: Wikimedia Commons, see Commons. Nothing here is a forecast, a grade, or a ranking of candidates.
Cite this page
The citation names the source data used for this record.