Skip to content
Project Curia

Elections · U.S. House, District 1 · Oklahoma

Nathaniel Butterfield

Republican Not on the November ballot

nathanbutterfield.com

Share this

The Butterfield cardThe race card

Raised for this seat

$1.7M

Through June 30, 2026

Cash on hand

$12K

Through June 30, 2026

Not on the November ballot

Butterfield is not on the November ballot for this seat. Mark Tedford and John Croisant are.

Mark TedfordRepublican · $1.8MJohn CroisantDemocrat · $142K

A primary result is a filed fact about a contest, not a judgement about a candidate. Butterfield's campaign finance and record below are still their own record, and their committee may still be filing.

The whole race

Where the money comes from

0%from small donors
Small donors
<1%$2K
Large donors
1%$17K
PACs
--
Party
--
Self-funding
99%$1.7M
Other
<1%$23

Separately, $7K in independent expenditures was reported for and against this candidate by outside committees. That money is not the candidate's receipts and is not part of the mix above.

Receipts reported through June 30, 2026. Source: FEC.

How to vote in Oklahoma

  • General electionNovember 3, 2026In 10 weeks

Register 25 days before the election.

All dates and rules

The district they want to represent

People
810K
Median household income
$71K
Unemployment
5.1%
Living below the poverty line
13.8%
Without health insurance
12.9%

U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 2024 5-year estimates. Context about the district, not a statement about any candidate.

Against the field for this seat

Each campaign's reported receipts on one shared scale, in ballot order, not money order.

Muted rows are campaigns not on the November ballot; this page's own row keeps its weight so the comparison stays readable. Showing 7 of 9 funded campaigns; every filing is on the race page.

The whole race

Spending to support them

No committee has filed independent spending in this direction.

Spending to oppose them

$7K
  • Sooner Integrity Fund$7K
How these directions are decided

Independent expenditures reported to the FEC. The supporting or opposing direction is each committee's own declared filing, not an interpretation, and a group spending against a candidate is not necessarily spending for their opponent. Outside money is not the campaign's money and is never added to what they raised.

In their own words

What Butterfield's campaign says it would work on.

The priorities Butterfield's own campaign site lists, quoted as written there. They are what the campaign says. Nobody has voted on them.

  • “The Fight”
  • “What I’m Fighting For”
  • “Back the Blue”
  • “Defend The Homeland”
  • “Cut Taxes & Wasteful Spending”
  • “Stand for Life”
  • “Fix Education”
  • “Bring Jobs Home”
  • “Defend the Second Amendment”
  • “Make America Energy Dominant”
  • “Support Freedom & Local Control”

Quoted from nathanbutterfield.com, read August 14, 2026. A campaign site changes; this is what it said on that date. Curia quotes these and does not check, rate or rank them.

Record in office

Butterfield has not held this office, so there is no federal voting record, no cosponsorships and no committee service to report.

That absence is not a position for or against anything; it is what a first federal campaign looks like in the public record.

Candidates and financing from the FEC, public domain. Nothing here is a forecast, a grade, or a ranking of candidates.