Elections · U.S. House, District 1 · Oklahoma
Share this
Raised for this seat
$1.7M
Through June 30, 2026
Cash on hand
$12K
Through June 30, 2026
Not on the November ballot
Butterfield is not on the November ballot for this seat. Mark Tedford and John Croisant are.
Who is on the ballot is a filed fact about the contest, not a judgement about a candidate. Butterfield's campaign finance and record below are still their own record, and their committee may still be filing.
Where the money comes from
- Small donors
- <1%$1.9K
- Large donors
- 1%$17K
- PACs
- --
- Party
- --
- Self-funding
- 99%$1.7M
- Other
- <1%$23
Separately, $7K in independent expenditures was reported opposing this candidate by outside committees. That money is not the candidate's receipts and is not part of the mix above.
Receipts reported through June 30, 2026. Source: FEC.
How to vote in Oklahoma
- General electionNovember 3, 2026
Register 25 days before the election.
The district they want to represent
- People
- 810K
- Median household income
- $71K
- Unemployment
- 5.1%
- Living below the poverty line
- 13.8%
- Without health insurance
- 12.9%
U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 2024 5-year estimates. Context about the district, not a statement about any candidate.
Against the field for this seat
Each campaign's reported receipts on one shared scale, incumbent first and then by name, never in money order.
- Nathan Butterfieldthis page$1.7M
- Jed Cochran$177K
- John Croisant$142K
- Kim David$200K
- Jackson Lahmeyer$416K
- Dan Rooney$689K
- Mark Tedford$1.8M
Muted rows are campaigns not on the November ballot; this page's own row keeps its weight so the comparison stays readable. Showing 7 of the 8 campaigns that hold the seat, are on the ballot, or have $25,000 raised or outside spending, not counting campaigns that ended before any ballot; every filing is on the race page.
Spending to support them
No committee has filed independent spending in this direction.
Spending to oppose them
$7K- Sooner Integrity Fund$7K
How these directions are decided
Independent expenditures reported to the FEC. The supporting or opposing direction is each committee's own declared filing, not an interpretation, and a group spending against a candidate is not necessarily spending for their opponent. Outside money is not the campaign's money and is never added to what they raised.
In their own words
What Butterfield's campaign says it would work on.
The priorities Butterfield's own campaign site lists, quoted as written there. They are what the campaign says. Nobody has voted on them.
- “The Fight”
- “What I’m Fighting For”
- “Back the Blue”
- “Defend The Homeland”
- “Cut Taxes & Wasteful Spending”
- “Stand for Life”
- “Fix Education”
- “Bring Jobs Home”
- “Defend the Second Amendment”
- “Make America Energy Dominant”
- “Support Freedom & Local Control”
Quoted from nathanbutterfield.com, read August 14, 2026. A campaign site changes; this is what it said on that date. Curia quotes these and does not check, rate or rank them.
Record in office
Butterfield does not hold a seat in Congress now, so there is no current voting record, cosponsorships or committee service to show here.
That absence is not a position for or against anything.
Candidates and financing from the FEC, public domain. Nothing here is a forecast, a grade, or a ranking of candidates.
Cite this page
The citation names the source data used for this record.