Elections · U.S. House, District 23 · Texas
Share this
Raised for this seat
$2.3M
Through June 30, 2026
Cash on hand
$227K
Through June 30, 2026
Not on the November ballot
Gonzales holds this seat, but is not on the November ballot for it. Brandon Herrera and Katy Padilla Stout are.
A primary result is a filed fact about a contest, not a judgement about a candidate. Gonzales's campaign finance and record below are still their own record, and their committee may still be filing.
Where the money comes from
- Small donors
- 1%$29K
- Large donors
- 37%$830K
- PACs
- 21%$475K
- Party
- --
- Self-funding
- --
- Other
- 41%$937K
Separately, $195K in independent expenditures was reported for and against this candidate by outside committees. That money is not the candidate's receipts and is not part of the mix above.
Receipts reported through June 30, 2026. Source: FEC.
How to vote in Texas
- General electionNovember 3, 2026In 10 weeks
Register 30 days before the election.
The district they want to represent
- People
- 771K
- Median household income
- $79K
- Unemployment
- 4.7%
- Living below the poverty line
- 13.6%
- Without health insurance
- 15.1%
U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 2024 5-year estimates. Context about the district, not a statement about any candidate.
Against the field for this seat
Each campaign's reported receipts on one shared scale, in ballot order, not money order.
- Ernest Gonzales IIthis page$2.3M
- Francisco Canseco$80K
- Gretel Enck$99K
- Brandon Herrera$1.9M
- Santos Limon$357K
- Susan Rubio$419K
- Katy Padilla Stout$485K
Muted rows are campaigns not on the November ballot; this page's own row keeps its weight so the comparison stays readable.
Spending to support them
$195K- Hispanic Leadership Action$79K
- Hispanic Leadership Trust$75K
- National Association of Realtors Political Action Committee$40K
- Texas Alliance for Life Fed PAC$54
Spending to oppose them
No committee has filed independent spending in this direction.
How these directions are decided
Independent expenditures reported to the FEC. The supporting or opposing direction is each committee's own declared filing, not an interpretation, and a group spending against a candidate is not necessarily spending for their opponent. Outside money is not the campaign's money and is never added to what they raised.
In their own words
What Gonzales's campaign says it would work on.
The priorities Gonzales's own campaign site lists, quoted as written there. They are what the campaign says. Nobody has voted on them.
- “Bóng đá Việt Nam (Vô địch Quốc Gia Và đtqg)”
- “Hình ảnh Full Hd, âm Thanh Sống động”
- “đội Ngũ Blv Sôi Nổi, Am Hiểu Bóng đá”
- “đường Truyền ổn định, Không Giật Lag”
- “Hoàn toàn miễn phí, không cần tạo tài khoản”
- “Lịch thi đấu bóng đá”
- “Bảng xếp hạng bóng đá”
- “Kết quả bóng đá mới nhất”
- “Nhận định trước trận”
- “Cập nhật tin tức bóng đá 24/7”
- “So Sánh Xoilac Tv Và Các Nền Tảng Trực Tiếp Bóng đá Khác”
- “Hệ thống gặp sự cố”
Quoted from tonygonzalesforcongress.com, read August 14, 2026. A campaign site changes; this is what it said on that date. Curia quotes these and does not check, rate or rank them.
Record in office
Gonzales has not held this office, so there is no federal voting record, no cosponsorships and no committee service to report.
That absence is not a position for or against anything; it is what a first federal campaign looks like in the public record.
Candidates and financing from the FEC, public domain. Nothing here is a forecast, a grade, or a ranking of candidates.