Skip to content
Project Curia

← All seven reforms

Reform No. 04

End Gerrymandering

Require every state to draw congressional districts through an independent redistricting commission.

38%

of sitting members with a documented cosponsorship, signature or vote

204 of 539 members

69 on the current bill, 135 only on a prior Congress’s.

CongressSupport for the question asked
Democrats
77%76%
Republicans
0%57%
Independents
67%72%

Voter figures: Noble Predictive Insights for Common Cause (an advocacy organization), Sept 2025.

Vehicle in the 119th Congress

Related bills not counted

  • Redistricting Transparency and Accountability Act

    House ·HR 5921

    Adds transparency and public-comment requirements to state redistricting but does not require states to transfer mapmaking authority to an independent commission.

  • Ban on mid-decade redistricting (Kiley)

    House ·HR 4889

    Prohibits a state from redistricting more than once per decade, barring the mid-decade map redraws at the center of the 2025 and 2026 redistricting fights, but does not require states to transfer mapmaking authority to an independent commission, the reform's standard.

  • Drain the Swamp Act (Title X)

    House ·HR 9222

    An omnibus of government-ethics measures whose Title X, Nonpartisan Redistricting Reform, bans mid-decade redistricting and sets criteria for maps. It assigns those duties to whatever entity a state already uses to draw its plan, never requiring an independent commission, so on this reform it falls short in the same way the other criteria-only bills here do. Other titles of the same bill address three more of these reforms and are ruled separately.

  • FAIR MAP Act

    House ·HR 7219

    Sets standards the maps themselves must meet, requiring districts to be contiguous and compact and barring maps drawn to favor a party or an incumbent, and prohibits mid-decade redistricting. It leaves mapmaking authority wherever a state has already placed it, and creates no commission, so it does not meet the reform's standard. The bill also reaches well beyond redistricting: it excludes people without lawful immigration status from apportionment counts, bars ranked choice voting in federal elections, requires photo identification or signature verification to vote, and prohibits same-day registration.

  • Fairness and Independence in Redistricting Act

    House ·HR 5426

    The long-running Tanner/Cooper bill; it does require an independent redistricting commission, meeting the reform's standard, but is a solo introduction with no cosponsors and no companion, so it is noted here rather than tracked alongside the Redistricting Reform Act (H.R. 5449 / S. 2885), which carries the same commission mandate with real cosponsorship.

Also crediting cosponsors of prior versions

What it does

The Redistricting Reform Act would require every state to draw congressional districts through an independent redistricting commission, and ban mid-decade partisan redistricting nationwide absent a court order.

Where Congress stands.

Alabama · 1 of 9 with a documented actionAlaska · 0 of 3 with a documented actionArizona · 3 of 11 with a documented actionColorado · 5 of 10 with a documented actionFlorida · 5 of 29 with a documented actionGeorgia · 6 of 16 with a documented actionIndiana · 2 of 11 with a documented actionKansas · 1 of 6 with a documented actionMaine · 3 of 4 with a documented actionMassachusetts · 11 of 11 with a documented actionMinnesota · 5 of 10 with a documented actionNew Jersey · 6 of 14 with a documented actionNorth Carolina · 3 of 16 with a documented actionNorth Dakota · 0 of 3 with a documented actionOklahoma · 0 of 7 with a documented actionPennsylvania · 7 of 19 with a documented actionSouth Dakota · 0 of 3 with a documented actionTexas · 9 of 39 with a documented actionWyoming · 0 of 3 with a documented actionConnecticut · 7 of 7 with a documented actionMissouri · 2 of 10 with a documented actionWest Virginia · 0 of 4 with a documented actionIllinois · 13 of 19 with a documented actionNew Mexico · 3 of 5 with a documented actionArkansas · 0 of 6 with a documented actionCalifornia · 44 of 54 with a documented actionDelaware · 2 of 3 with a documented actionDistrict of Columbia · 1 of 1 with a documented actionHawaii · 3 of 4 with a documented actionIowa · 0 of 6 with a documented actionKentucky · 0 of 8 with a documented actionMaryland · 4 of 10 with a documented actionMichigan · 5 of 15 with a documented actionMississippi · 1 of 6 with a documented actionMontana · 0 of 4 with a documented actionNew Hampshire · 3 of 4 with a documented actionNew York · 14 of 28 with a documented actionOhio · 3 of 17 with a documented actionOregon · 3 of 8 with a documented actionTennessee · 1 of 11 with a documented actionUtah · 0 of 6 with a documented actionVirginia · 6 of 13 with a documented actionWashington · 8 of 12 with a documented actionWisconsin · 3 of 10 with a documented actionNebraska · 0 of 5 with a documented actionSouth Carolina · 1 of 9 with a documented actionIdaho · 0 of 4 with a documented actionNevada · 5 of 6 with a documented actionVermont · 2 of 3 with a documented actionLouisiana · 0 of 8 with a documented actionRhode Island · 2 of 4 with a documented action
None recordedWhole delegation

Select a state on the map, or search for your representative, to see where each member stands.

Find your own representatives →

Share this gap

Download the gap between what voters want and what Congress has cosponsored. Generated from the documented record, with the poll and source on the card.

Every card is generated from today's data and carries its source. Take it and post it. You do not need to credit Project Curia. The card already does.