Elections · U.S. House, District 1 · Arizona
Share this
Raised for this seat
$2.2M
Through July 1, 2026
Cash on hand
$539K
Through July 1, 2026
Not on the November ballot
Galan-Woods is not on the November ballot for this seat. Jay Feely and Amish Shah are.
A primary result is a filed fact about a contest, not a judgement about a candidate. Galan-Woods's campaign finance and record below are still their own record, and their committee may still be filing.
Where the money comes from
- Small donors
- 16%$339K
- Large donors
- 74%$1.6M
- PACs
- 10%$215K
- Party
- --
- Self-funding
- <1%$7K
- Other
- 1%$12K
Separately, $852K in independent expenditures was reported for and against this candidate by outside committees. That money is not the candidate's receipts and is not part of the mix above.
Receipts reported through July 1, 2026. Source: FEC.
How to vote in Arizona
- General electionNovember 3, 2026In 10 weeks
Register 29 days before the election.
The district they want to represent
- People
- 805K
- Median household income
- $100K
- Unemployment
- 4.0%
- Living below the poverty line
- 8.7%
- Without health insurance
- 7.7%
U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 2024 5-year estimates. Context about the district, not a statement about any candidate.
Against the field for this seat
Each campaign's reported receipts on one shared scale, in ballot order, not money order.
- Joseph Chaplik$605K
- Jay Feely$2.5M
- Marlene Galan-Woodsthis page$2.2M
- Rick McCartney$1.3M
- Amish Shah$1.8M
- Jonathan Treble$4.0M
- John Trobough$1.2M
Muted rows are campaigns not on the November ballot; this page's own row keeps its weight so the comparison stays readable. Showing 7 of 10 funded campaigns; every filing is on the race page.
Spending to support them
$691K- Pro-Choice Majority Action$600K
- CHC Bold PAC$91K
Spending to oppose them
$161K- The Impact Fund$96K
- American Democracy Project$65K
How these directions are decided
Independent expenditures reported to the FEC. The supporting or opposing direction is each committee's own declared filing, not an interpretation, and a group spending against a candidate is not necessarily spending for their opponent. Outside money is not the campaign's money and is never added to what they raised.
Record in office
Galan-Woods has not held this office, so there is no federal voting record, no cosponsorships and no committee service to report.
That absence is not a position for or against anything; it is what a first federal campaign looks like in the public record.
What the campaign says, on marleneforcongress.comCandidates and financing from the FEC, public domain. Nothing here is a forecast, a grade, or a ranking of candidates.