Skip to content
Project Curia

← Financing

U.S. Senator · MD

Angela D. Alsobrooks

DemocratSenate Class 1Term through January 2031

Funding profile · 2019–2024 term

26% of the money Alsobrooks raised came from small donors.

More grassroots-funded than 66% of the Senate.

Alsobrooks raised $31.1M across the full six-year Senate term (2019–2024), and ended the period with $50K cash on hand. Here is where the money came from.

26%from small donors
Small donors
26%$8.2M
Large donors
49%$15.3M
Bundled
1%$0.3M
PACs
4%$1.2M
Other
20%$6.1M

Against the senate

How Alsobrooks compares to the typical member.

Small-donor share
26%vs 19% senate median
PAC share
4%vs 14% senate median

Who has a stake in Alsobrooks

The organizations behind the money.

Alsobrooks's largest organized backing comes from Emilys List. That counts the group's own PAC check plus the individual donations it bundled, not just the direct check.

Money organized for Alsobrooks

Emilys List›

$130K

EMILY's List's PAC, which backs Democratic women who support abortion rights.

Who it funds, across Congress

100% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $2.4M to 47 members

Jstreetpac›$126K

J Street's PAC, a liberal pro-Israel group that backs candidates supporting a two-state solution, often a counterweight to AIPAC.

Who it funds, across Congress

100% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $4.0M to 144 members

Ameripac: The Fund For A Greater America›$34K

Who it funds, across Congress

100% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $1.0M to 79 members

Reproductive Freedom For All PAC›$19K

Who it funds, across Congress

99% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $375K to 65 members

Windem›$13K

Who it funds, across Congress

100% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $297K to 29 members

› What is organized money?

An organization reaches a member two ways. Its own PAC writes a direct check. And it bundles: it gathers individual donations from its supporters and routes them through its conduit. Both count here as one “organized” total. The bundled part is already inside the individual giving shown in the funding mix above. Here it is regrouped by the organization that gathered it, so you can see who did the organizing. Alsobrooksreceived so many small earmarked donations that these figures count only the largest ones. Read every total as “at least.”

The same money, by industry

Which industries have a stake.

The same organized money, grouped by the industry of the organization that moved it. It shows the interests behind Alsobrooks's backing, not just the individual groups.

$197KIdeological
$165KLabor
$126KPro-Israel
$36KHealth
$20KEnergy

Plus $641K from organizations whose FEC name did not sort into an industry.

The money spent about Alsobrooks

Spent for or against.

Outside groups also spend on their own to elect or defeat Alsobrooks, running ads for or against the race. This money never passes through the campaign, so it is counted apart from the money organized for Alsobrooks.

All outside groups11% to help, 89% to hurt$30.1M
  1. Maryland'S Future$26.7M
    To help Alsobrooks
    —
    To hurt Alsobrooks
    $26.7M
  2. Black Progressive Action Coalition$991K
    To help Alsobrooks
    $991K
    To hurt Alsobrooks
    —
  3. National Nurses United For Patient Protection$942K
    To help Alsobrooks
    $942K
    To hurt Alsobrooks
    —
  4. Blackpac$804K
    To help Alsobrooks
    $804K
    To hurt Alsobrooks
    —
  5. Save America Fund$147K
    To help Alsobrooks
    $147K
    To hurt Alsobrooks
    —

FEC filings, 2019–2024 term · as of August 2026 · showing the top 5 funders of 192 organizations with a stake

About this data

FEC-disclosed receipts for the 2019–2024 term. This is the disclosed money only. Spending by outside groups that do not reveal their donors, the dark money that set a record in 2024, never appears in these figures.

Every percentage here is a share of all receipts, not of individual contributions only. So the small-donor share counts transfers, loans, and other money in its base, and can read higher than figures that divide only by individual money.

PAC figures are contributions to Alsobrooks's campaign committee from FEC filings. Industry labels are grouped from each committee's name and are approximate. Joint fundraising committees and small-dollar conduits like ActBlue and WinRed are not counted.

84%want dark money disclosed

Support for requiring the groups that spend on elections to name their donors, across both parties. Congress has not passed the DISCLOSE Act.

Where Alsobrooks stands