U.S. Senator · DE
Lisa Blunt Rochester
DemocratSenate Class 1Term through January 2031
Funding profile · 2019–2024 term
22% of the money Blunt Rochester raised came from small donors.
More grassroots-funded than 56% of the Senate.
Blunt Rochester raised $9.9M across the full six-year Senate term (2019–2024), and ended the period with $144K cash on hand. Here is where the money came from.
- Small donors
- 22%$2.2M
- Large donors
- 39%$3.8M
- Bundled
- 0%$0.0M
- PACs
- 24%$2.4M
- Other
- 15%$1.5M
Against the senate
How Blunt Rochester compares to the typical member.
- Small-donor share
- 22%vs 19% senate median
- PAC share
- 24%vs 14% senate median
Who has a stake in Blunt Rochester
The organizations behind the money.
Blunt Rochester's largest organized backing comes from Emily'S List. That counts the group's own PAC check plus the individual donations it bundled, not just the direct check.
Money organized for Blunt Rochester
Emily'S List›
$33K
Emily'S List›
$33K
EMILY's List's PAC, which backs Democratic women who support abortion rights.
Who it funds, across Congress
100% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $2.4M to 47 members
Jstreetpac›$17K
J Street's PAC, a liberal pro-Israel group that backs candidates supporting a two-state solution, often a counterweight to AIPAC.
Who it funds, across Congress
100% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $4.0M to 144 members
Morgan Stanley PAC›$13K
Who it funds, across Congress
47% Democrats · 53% Republicans · $554K to 92 members
National Association Of Realtors›$10K
Who it funds, across Congress
43% Democrats · 57% Republicans · $4.9M to 452 members
Outside spending, by party
Spent $18.9M to elect Republicans.
Int'L Union Of Painters & Allied Trades Political Action Together Political Cmte›$10K
Who it funds, across Congress
92% Democrats · 6% Republicans · $929K to 147 members
› What is organized money?
An organization reaches a member two ways. Its own PAC writes a direct check. And it bundles: it gathers individual donations from its supporters and routes them through its conduit. Both count here as one “organized” total. The bundled part is already inside the individual giving shown in the funding mix above. Here it is regrouped by the organization that gathered it, so you can see who did the organizing.
The same money, by industry
Which industries have a stake.
The same organized money, grouped by the industry of the organization that moved it. It shows the interests behind Blunt Rochester's backing, not just the individual groups.
Plus $956K from organizations whose FEC name did not sort into an industry.
The money spent about Blunt Rochester
Spent for or against.
Outside groups also spend on their own to elect or defeat Blunt Rochester, running ads for or against the race. This money never passes through the campaign, so it is counted apart from the money organized for Blunt Rochester.
Seiu Cope›$14K
To help Blunt Rochester$14KTo hurt Blunt Rochester—SEIU COPE, the political fund of the Service Employees International Union, representing health-care, janitorial, and public-service workers.
Seiu Cope›$14K—$14K
Seiu Cope
SEIU COPE, the political fund of the Service Employees International Union, representing health-care, janitorial, and public-service workers.
FEC filings, 2019–2024 term · as of August 2026 · showing the top 5 funders of 484 organizations with a stake
About this data
FEC-disclosed receipts for the 2019–2024 term. This is the disclosed money only. Spending by outside groups that do not reveal their donors, the dark money that set a record in 2024, never appears in these figures.
Every percentage here is a share of all receipts, not of individual contributions only. So the small-donor share counts transfers, loans, and other money in its base, and can read higher than figures that divide only by individual money.
PAC figures are contributions to Blunt Rochester's campaign committee from FEC filings. Industry labels are grouped from each committee's name and are approximate. Joint fundraising committees and small-dollar conduits like ActBlue and WinRed are not counted.
Support for requiring the groups that spend on elections to name their donors, across both parties. Congress has not passed the DISCLOSE Act.
Where Blunt Rochester stands