Skip to content
Project Curia

Financing

U.S. Senator · DE

Christopher A. Coons

DemocratSenate Class 2Term through January 2027

Funding profile · 2015–2020 term

5% of the money Coons raised came from small donors.

More grassroots-funded than 13% of the Senate.

Coons raised $7.2M across the full six-year Senate term (2015–2020), and ended the period with $1.8M cash on hand. Here is where the money came from.

5%from small donors
Small donors
5%$0.3M
Large donors
60%$4.3M
Bundled
1%$0.1M
PACs
33%$2.4M
Other
1%$0.1M

Against the senate

How Coons compares to the typical member.

Small-donor share
5%vs 19% senate median
PAC share
33%vs 14% senate median

Who has a stake in Coons

The organizations behind the money.

Coons's largest organized backing comes from Votesane PAC. That counts the group's own PAC check plus the individual donations it bundled, not just the direct check.

$2.1M in PAC money not itemized by group

Coons collected $2.1M of PAC money through a joint fundraising committee, which pools contributions and transfers them as a lump sum. It is counted in the organized total above, but FEC filings do not itemize which PACs it came from at the campaign level, so it is not attributed to a named organization here.

Money organized for Coons

Votesane PAC

$49K

Who it funds, across Congress

40% Democrats · 60% Republicans · $2.6M to 42 members

Pro-Israel America PAC$19K

Who it funds, across Congress

26% Democrats · 74% Republicans · $693K to 19 members

National Association Of Broadcasters PAC$7K

The National Association of Broadcasters' PAC, representing TV and radio station owners.

Who it funds, across Congress

47% Democrats · 53% Republicans · $1.5M to 255 members

Alston & Bird PAC$5K

Who it funds, across Congress

49% Democrats · 51% Republicans · $117K to 45 members

Hoops PAC$5K

Who it funds, across Congress

98% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $269K to 34 members

What is organized money?

An organization reaches a member two ways. Its own PAC writes a direct check. And it bundles: it gathers individual donations from its supporters and routes them through its conduit. Both count here as one “organized” total. The bundled part is already inside the individual giving shown in the funding mix above. Here it is regrouped by the organization that gathered it, so you can see who did the organizing.

The same money, by industry

Which industries have a stake.

The same organized money, grouped by the industry of the organization that moved it. It shows the interests behind Coons's backing, not just the individual groups.

$31KLabor
$30KHealth
$28KFinance
$26KTech
$21KPro-Israel

Plus $183K from organizations whose FEC name did not sort into an industry.

FEC filings, 2015–2020 term · as of August 2026 · showing the top 5 funders of 120 organizations with a stake

About this data

FEC-disclosed receipts for the 2015–2020 term. This is the disclosed money only. Spending by outside groups that do not reveal their donors, the dark money that set a record in 2024, never appears in these figures.

Every percentage here is a share of all receipts, not of individual contributions only. So the small-donor share counts transfers, loans, and other money in its base, and can read higher than figures that divide only by individual money.

84%want dark money disclosed

Support for requiring the groups that spend on elections to name their donors, across both parties. Congress has not passed the DISCLOSE Act.

Where Coons stands