U.S. Senator · UT
John R. Curtis
RepublicanSenate Class 1Term through January 2031
Funding profile · 2019–2024 term
1% of the money Curtis raised came from small donors.
More grassroots-funded than 1% of the Senate.
Curtis raised $5.7M across the full six-year Senate term (2019–2024), and ended the period with $789K cash on hand. Here is where the money came from.
- Small donors
- 1%$0.0M
- Large donors
- 35%$2.0M
- Bundled
- 5%$0.3M
- PACs
- 36%$2.0M
- Other
- 24%$1.4M
Against the senate
How Curtis compares to the typical member.
- Small-donor share
- 1%vs 19% senate median
- PAC share
- 36%vs 14% senate median
Who has a stake in Curtis
The organizations behind the money.
Curtis's largest organized backing comes from No Labels Problem Solvers PAC. That counts the group's own PAC check plus the individual donations it bundled, not just the direct check.
Money organized for Curtis
No Labels Problem Solvers PAC›
$182K
No Labels Problem Solvers PAC›
$182K
Who it funds, across Congress
15% Democrats · 85% Republicans · $1.5M to 25 members
AIPAC›$118K
The American Israel Public Affairs Committee, a pro-Israel lobby that both gives directly and bundles individual donations; its super PAC (United Democracy Project) runs large independent campaigns in primaries.
Who it funds, across Congress
59% Democrats · 40% Republicans · $38.7M to 359 members
Outside spending, by party
Spent $13.9M to elect Democrats; $5.0M to defeat Democrats.
1-800 Contacts, Inc. PAC›$18K
Who it funds, across Congress
53% Democrats · 47% Republicans · $118K to 28 members
Fox Corporation PAC›$17K
Who it funds, across Congress
44% Democrats · 56% Republicans · $286K to 79 members
National Automobile Dealers Association PAC›$15K
The National Automobile Dealers Association's PAC, representing franchised car dealers.
Who it funds, across Congress
31% Democrats · 69% Republicans · $2.4M to 323 members
› What is organized money?
An organization reaches a member two ways. Its own PAC writes a direct check. And it bundles: it gathers individual donations from its supporters and routes them through its conduit. Both count here as one “organized” total. The bundled part is already inside the individual giving shown in the funding mix above. Here it is regrouped by the organization that gathered it, so you can see who did the organizing.
The same money, by industry
Which industries have a stake.
The same organized money, grouped by the industry of the organization that moved it. It shows the interests behind Curtis's backing, not just the individual groups.
Plus $730K from organizations whose FEC name did not sort into an industry.
The money spent about Curtis
Spent for or against.
Outside groups also spend on their own to elect or defeat Curtis, running ads for or against the race. This money never passes through the campaign, so it is counted apart from the money organized for Curtis.
Conservative Values For Utah$5.0M
To help Curtis$5.0MTo hurt Curtis—Defend American Jobs (Crypto)›$1.9M
To help Curtis$1.9MTo hurt Curtis—A crypto-industry super PAC (part of the Fairshake network) spending to elect candidates friendly to digital assets.
Clearpath Action Fund,$486K
To help Curtis$486KTo hurt Curtis—American Conservation Coalition PAC$254K
To help Curtis$254KTo hurt Curtis—Edf Action Votes$101K
To help Curtis$101KTo hurt Curtis—
Conservative Values For Utah›$5.0M—$5.0M
Conservative Values For Utah
Defend American Jobs (Crypto)›$1.9M—$1.9M
Defend American Jobs (Crypto)
A crypto-industry super PAC (part of the Fairshake network) spending to elect candidates friendly to digital assets.
Clearpath Action Fund,$486K—$486K
American Conservation Coalition PAC›$254K—$254K
American Conservation Coalition PAC
Edf Action Votes$101K—$101K
FEC filings, 2019–2024 term · as of August 2026 · showing the top 5 funders of 466 organizations with a stake
About this data
FEC-disclosed receipts for the 2019–2024 term. This is the disclosed money only. Spending by outside groups that do not reveal their donors, the dark money that set a record in 2024, never appears in these figures.
Every percentage here is a share of all receipts, not of individual contributions only. So the small-donor share counts transfers, loans, and other money in its base, and can read higher than figures that divide only by individual money.
PAC figures are contributions to Curtis's campaign committee from FEC filings. Industry labels are grouped from each committee's name and are approximate. Joint fundraising committees and small-dollar conduits like ActBlue and WinRed are not counted.
Support for requiring the groups that spend on elections to name their donors, across both parties. Congress has not passed the DISCLOSE Act.
Where Curtis stands