U.S. Representative · NC · District 1
Donald G. Davis
DemocratTerm through January 2027
Funding profile · 2023–2024 cycle
10% of the money Davis raised came from small donors.
More grassroots-funded than 68% of the House.
Davis raised $6.1M across the two-year election cycle (2023–2024), and ended the period with $271K cash on hand. Here is where the money came from.
- Small donors
- 10%$0.6M
- Large donors
- 42%$2.6M
- Bundled
- 10%$0.6M
- PACs
- 30%$1.8M
- Other
- 7%$0.4M
Against the house
How Davis compares to the typical member.
- Small-donor share
- 10%vs 5% house median
- PAC share
- 30%vs 37% house median
Who has a stake in Davis
The organizations behind the money.
Davis's largest organized backing comes from AIPAC. That counts the group's own PAC check plus the individual donations it bundled, not just the direct check.
Money organized for Davis
AIPAC›
$537K
AIPAC›
$537K
The American Israel Public Affairs Committee, a pro-Israel lobby that both gives directly and bundles individual donations; its super PAC (United Democracy Project) runs large independent campaigns in primaries.
Who it funds, across Congress
59% Democrats · 40% Republicans · $38.7M to 359 members
Outside spending, by party
Spent $13.9M to elect Democrats; $5.0M to defeat Democrats.
Ameripac: The Fund For A Greater America›$35K
Who it funds, across Congress
100% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $1.0M to 79 members
Swing Left›$25K
Who it funds, across Congress
100% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $895K to 34 members
Fair Shot PAC›$23K
Who it funds, across Congress
100% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $914K to 102 members
New Democrat Coalition Action Fund›$17K
Who it funds, across Congress
100% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $563K to 74 members
› What is organized money?
An organization reaches a member two ways. Its own PAC writes a direct check. And it bundles: it gathers individual donations from its supporters and routes them through its conduit. Both count here as one “organized” total. The bundled part is already inside the individual giving shown in the funding mix above. Here it is regrouped by the organization that gathered it, so you can see who did the organizing.
The same money, by industry
Which industries have a stake.
The same organized money, grouped by the industry of the organization that moved it. It shows the interests behind Davis's backing, not just the individual groups.
Plus $723K from organizations whose FEC name did not sort into an industry.
The money spent about Davis
Spent for or against.
Outside groups also spend on their own to elect or defeat Davis, running ads for or against the race. This money never passes through the campaign, so it is counted apart from the money organized for Davis.
National Association Of Realtors$1.1M
To help Davis$1.1MTo hurt Davis—With Honor Fund II,$533K
To help Davis$533KTo hurt Davis—Center Forward Committee$75K
To help Davis$75KTo hurt Davis—Animal Wellness Action$50K
To help Davis$50KTo hurt Davis—Working America$16K
To help Davis$16KTo hurt Davis—
National Association Of Realtors›$1.1M—$1.1M
National Association Of Realtors
With Honor Fund II,$533K—$533K
Center Forward Committee›$75K—$75K
Center Forward Committee
Animal Wellness Action$50K—$50K
Working America$16K—$16K
FEC filings, 2023–2024 cycle · as of August 2026 · showing the top 5 funders of 419 organizations with a stake
About this data
FEC-disclosed receipts for the 2023–2024 cycle. This is the disclosed money only. Spending by outside groups that do not reveal their donors, the dark money that set a record in 2024, never appears in these figures.
Every percentage here is a share of all receipts, not of individual contributions only. So the small-donor share counts transfers, loans, and other money in its base, and can read higher than figures that divide only by individual money.
PAC figures are contributions to Davis's campaign committee from FEC filings. Industry labels are grouped from each committee's name and are approximate. Joint fundraising committees and small-dollar conduits like ActBlue and WinRed are not counted.
Support for requiring the groups that spend on elections to name their donors, across both parties. Congress has not passed the DISCLOSE Act.
Where Davis stands