U.S. Senator · AZ
Ruben Gallego
DemocratSenate Class 1Term through January 2031
Funding profile · 2019–2024 term
42% of the money Gallego raised came from small donors.
More grassroots-funded than 91% of the Senate.
Gallego raised $64.7M across the full six-year Senate term (2019–2024), and ended the period with $211K cash on hand. Here is where the money came from.
- Small donors
- 42%$27.0M
- Large donors
- 50%$32.2M
- Bundled
- 0%$0.2M
- PACs
- 3%$1.8M
- Other
- 5%$3.5M
Against the senate
How Gallego compares to the typical member.
- Small-donor share
- 42%vs 19% senate median
- PAC share
- 3%vs 14% senate median
Who has a stake in Gallego
The organizations behind the money.
Gallego's largest organized backing comes from Swing Left. That counts the group's own PAC check plus the individual donations it bundled, not just the direct check.
Money organized for Gallego
Swing Left›
$45K
Swing Left›
$45K
Who it funds, across Congress
100% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $895K to 34 members
AIPAC›$25K
The American Israel Public Affairs Committee, a pro-Israel lobby that both gives directly and bundles individual donations; its super PAC (United Democracy Project) runs large independent campaigns in primaries.
Who it funds, across Congress
59% Democrats · 40% Republicans · $38.7M to 359 members
Outside spending, by party
Spent $13.9M to elect Democrats; $5.0M to defeat Democrats.
League Of Conservation Voters Action Fund›$25K
Who it funds, across Congress
99% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $939K to 148 members
Pro-Israel America PAC›$21K
Who it funds, across Congress
26% Democrats · 74% Republicans · $693K to 19 members
NORPAC›$17K
A pro-Israel political action committee that bundles individual donations to candidates it judges supportive of the U.S. relationship with Israel.
Who it funds, across Congress
40% Democrats · 59% Republicans · $2.2M to 82 members
› What is organized money?
An organization reaches a member two ways. Its own PAC writes a direct check. And it bundles: it gathers individual donations from its supporters and routes them through its conduit. Both count here as one “organized” total. The bundled part is already inside the individual giving shown in the funding mix above. Here it is regrouped by the organization that gathered it, so you can see who did the organizing. Gallegoreceived so many small earmarked donations that these figures count only the largest ones. Read every total as “at least.”
The same money, by industry
Which industries have a stake.
The same organized money, grouped by the industry of the organization that moved it. It shows the interests behind Gallego's backing, not just the individual groups.
Plus $801K from organizations whose FEC name did not sort into an industry.
The money spent about Gallego
Spent for or against.
Outside groups also spend on their own to elect or defeat Gallego, running ads for or against the race. This money never passes through the campaign, so it is counted apart from the money organized for Gallego.
Win It Back PAC$15.5M
To help Gallego—To hurt Gallego$15.5MProtect Progress$10.0M
To help Gallego$10.0MTo hurt Gallego—Votevets$2.9M
To help Gallego$2.9MTo hurt Gallego—LCV Victory Fund›$2.8M
To help Gallego$2.8MTo hurt Gallego—The League of Conservation Voters' super PAC, spending on environmental-minded candidates.
Esafund$2.4M
To help Gallego—To hurt Gallego$2.4M
Win It Back PAC—$15.5M$15.5M
Protect Progress$10.0M—$10.0M
Votevets$2.9M—$2.9M
LCV Victory Fund›$2.8M—$2.8M
LCV Victory Fund
The League of Conservation Voters' super PAC, spending on environmental-minded candidates.
Esafund—$2.4M$2.4M
FEC filings, 2019–2024 term · as of August 2026 · showing the top 5 funders of 394 organizations with a stake
About this data
FEC-disclosed receipts for the 2019–2024 term. This is the disclosed money only. Spending by outside groups that do not reveal their donors, the dark money that set a record in 2024, never appears in these figures.
Every percentage here is a share of all receipts, not of individual contributions only. So the small-donor share counts transfers, loans, and other money in its base, and can read higher than figures that divide only by individual money.
PAC figures are contributions to Gallego's campaign committee from FEC filings. Industry labels are grouped from each committee's name and are approximate. Joint fundraising committees and small-dollar conduits like ActBlue and WinRed are not counted.
Support for requiring the groups that spend on elections to name their donors, across both parties. Congress has not passed the DISCLOSE Act.
Where Gallego stands