Skip to content
Project Curia

← Financing

U.S. Representative · WA · District 3

Marie Gluesenkamp Perez

DemocratTerm through January 2027

Funding profile · 2023–2024 cycle

15% of the money Gluesenkamp Perez raised came from small donors.

More grassroots-funded than 80% of the House.

Gluesenkamp Perez raised $11.9M across the two-year election cycle (2023–2024), and ended the period with $26K cash on hand. Here is where the money came from.

15%from small donors
Small donors
15%$1.8M
Large donors
60%$7.1M
Bundled
4%$0.4M
PACs
11%$1.3M
Other
10%$1.2M

Against the house

How Gluesenkamp Perez compares to the typical member.

Small-donor share
15%vs 5% house median
PAC share
11%vs 37% house median

Who has a stake in Gluesenkamp Perez

The organizations behind the money.

Gluesenkamp Perez's largest organized backing comes from AIPAC. That counts the group's own PAC check plus the individual donations it bundled, not just the direct check.

Money organized for Gluesenkamp Perez

AIPAC›

$188K

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee, a pro-Israel lobby that both gives directly and bundles individual donations; its super PAC (United Democracy Project) runs large independent campaigns in primaries.

Who it funds, across Congress

59% Democrats · 40% Republicans · $38.7M to 359 members

Outside spending, by party

Spent $13.9M to elect Democrats; $5.0M to defeat Democrats.

Emily'S List›$114K

EMILY's List's PAC, which backs Democratic women who support abortion rights.

Who it funds, across Congress

100% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $2.4M to 47 members

Zinc Collective PAC›$40K

Who it funds, across Congress

100% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $693K to 25 members

Ameripac: The Fund For A Greater America›$32K

Who it funds, across Congress

100% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $1.0M to 79 members

Fair Shot PAC›$23K

Who it funds, across Congress

100% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $914K to 102 members

› What is organized money?

An organization reaches a member two ways. Its own PAC writes a direct check. And it bundles: it gathers individual donations from its supporters and routes them through its conduit. Both count here as one “organized” total. The bundled part is already inside the individual giving shown in the funding mix above. Here it is regrouped by the organization that gathered it, so you can see who did the organizing. Gluesenkamp Perezreceived so many small earmarked donations that these figures count only the largest ones. Read every total as “at least.”

The same money, by industry

Which industries have a stake.

The same organized money, grouped by the industry of the organization that moved it. It shows the interests behind Gluesenkamp Perez's backing, not just the individual groups.

$230KIdeological
$203KPro-Israel
$186KLabor
$46KAg & Food
$45KEnergy

Plus $611K from organizations whose FEC name did not sort into an industry.

The money spent about Gluesenkamp Perez

Spent for or against.

Outside groups also spend on their own to elect or defeat Gluesenkamp Perez, running ads for or against the race. This money never passes through the campaign, so it is counted apart from the money organized for Gluesenkamp Perez.

All outside groups32% to help, 68% to hurt$6.6M
  1. NRCC›$4.1M
    To help Gluesenkamp Perez
    —
    To hurt Gluesenkamp Perez
    $4.1M

    The National Republican Congressional Committee, the party committee for electing House Republicans.

  2. Project 218$1.3M
    To help Gluesenkamp Perez
    $1.3M
    To hurt Gluesenkamp Perez
    —
  3. Welcomepac$387K
    To help Gluesenkamp Perez
    $387K
    To hurt Gluesenkamp Perez
    —
  4. America PAC (Musk)$321K
    To help Gluesenkamp Perez
    —
    To hurt Gluesenkamp Perez
    $321K
  5. Together For Progress 2024$296K
    To help Gluesenkamp Perez
    $296K
    To hurt Gluesenkamp Perez
    —

FEC filings, 2023–2024 cycle · as of August 2026 · showing the top 5 funders of 293 organizations with a stake

About this data

FEC-disclosed receipts for the 2023–2024 cycle. This is the disclosed money only. Spending by outside groups that do not reveal their donors, the dark money that set a record in 2024, never appears in these figures.

Every percentage here is a share of all receipts, not of individual contributions only. So the small-donor share counts transfers, loans, and other money in its base, and can read higher than figures that divide only by individual money.

PAC figures are contributions to Gluesenkamp Perez's campaign committee from FEC filings. Industry labels are grouped from each committee's name and are approximate. Joint fundraising committees and small-dollar conduits like ActBlue and WinRed are not counted.

84%want dark money disclosed

Support for requiring the groups that spend on elections to name their donors, across both parties. Congress has not passed the DISCLOSE Act.

Where Gluesenkamp Perez stands