U.S. Representative · TX · District 26
Brandon Gill
RepublicanTerm through January 2027
Funding profile · 2023–2024 cycle
15% of the money Gill raised came from small donors.
More grassroots-funded than 79% of the House.
Gill raised $1.8M across the two-year election cycle (2023–2024), and ended the period with $128K cash on hand. Here is where the money came from.
- Small donors
- 15%$0.3M
- Large donors
- 33%$0.6M
- Bundled
- 3%$0.0M
- PACs
- 15%$0.3M
- Other
- 34%$0.6M
Against the house
How Gill compares to the typical member.
- Small-donor share
- 15%vs 5% house median
- PAC share
- 15%vs 37% house median
Who has a stake in Gill
The organizations behind the money.
Gill's largest organized backing comes from House Freedom Fund. That counts the group's own PAC check plus the individual donations it bundled, not just the direct check.
Money organized for Gill
House Freedom Fund›
$50K
House Freedom Fund›
$50K
The House Freedom Fund, the money arm of the hard-right House Freedom Caucus.
Who it funds, across Congress
0% Democrats · 100% Republicans · $2.0M to 34 members
Outside spending, by party
Spent $2.0M to elect Republicans; $61K to defeat Democrats.
AIPAC›$15K
The American Israel Public Affairs Committee, a pro-Israel lobby that both gives directly and bundles individual donations; its super PAC (United Democracy Project) runs large independent campaigns in primaries.
Who it funds, across Congress
59% Democrats · 40% Republicans · $38.7M to 359 members
Outside spending, by party
Spent $13.9M to elect Democrats; $5.0M to defeat Democrats.
The Eye Of The Tiger PAC›$10K
Eye of the Tiger PAC, a Republican leadership PAC.
Who it funds, across Congress
0% Democrats · 99% Republicans · $1.1M to 133 members
Brandon Gill Victory Fund›$8K
Who it funds, across Congress
0% Democrats · 100% Republicans · $8K to 1 members
E-PAC›$8K
Who it funds, across Congress
0% Democrats · 99% Republicans · $439K to 66 members
› What is organized money?
An organization reaches a member two ways. Its own PAC writes a direct check. And it bundles: it gathers individual donations from its supporters and routes them through its conduit. Both count here as one “organized” total. The bundled part is already inside the individual giving shown in the funding mix above. Here it is regrouped by the organization that gathered it, so you can see who did the organizing.
The same money, by industry
Which industries have a stake.
The same organized money, grouped by the industry of the organization that moved it. It shows the interests behind Gill's backing, not just the individual groups.
Plus $109K from organizations whose FEC name did not sort into an industry.
The money spent about Gill
Spent for or against.
Outside groups also spend on their own to elect or defeat Gill, running ads for or against the race. This money never passes through the campaign, so it is counted apart from the money organized for Gill.
America Leads Action$1.1M
To help Gill—To hurt Gill$1.1MConservatives For American Excellence$972K
To help Gill—To hurt Gill$972KClub For Growth›$516K
To help Gill$516KTo hurt Gill$98Club for Growth's PAC and super PAC, backing anti-tax, small-government conservatives, often against Republican incumbents in primaries.
Right Texas$422K
To help Gill$422KTo hurt Gill—House Freedom Fund›$9K
To help Gill$9KTo hurt Gill—The House Freedom Fund, the money arm of the hard-right House Freedom Caucus.
America Leads Action—$1.1M$1.1M
Conservatives For American Excellence›—$972K$972K
Conservatives For American Excellence
Club For Growth›$516K$98$516K
Club For Growth
Club for Growth's PAC and super PAC, backing anti-tax, small-government conservatives, often against Republican incumbents in primaries.
Right Texas$422K—$422K
House Freedom Fund›$9K—$9K
House Freedom Fund
The House Freedom Fund, the money arm of the hard-right House Freedom Caucus.
FEC filings, 2023–2024 cycle · as of August 2026 · showing the top 5 funders of 82 organizations with a stake
About this data
FEC-disclosed receipts for the 2023–2024 cycle. This is the disclosed money only. Spending by outside groups that do not reveal their donors, the dark money that set a record in 2024, never appears in these figures.
Every percentage here is a share of all receipts, not of individual contributions only. So the small-donor share counts transfers, loans, and other money in its base, and can read higher than figures that divide only by individual money.
PAC figures are contributions to Gill's campaign committee from FEC filings. Industry labels are grouped from each committee's name and are approximate. Joint fundraising committees and small-dollar conduits like ActBlue and WinRed are not counted.
Support for requiring the groups that spend on elections to name their donors, across both parties. Congress has not passed the DISCLOSE Act.
Where Gill stands