U.S. Senator · NJ
Andy Kim
DemocratSenate Class 1Term through January 2031
Funding profile · 2019–2024 term
23% of the money Kim raised came from small donors.
More grassroots-funded than 58% of the Senate.
Kim raised $12.4M across the full six-year Senate term (2019–2024), and ended the period with $622K cash on hand. Here is where the money came from.
- Small donors
- 23%$2.8M
- Large donors
- 62%$7.7M
- Bundled
- 5%$0.6M
- PACs
- 6%$0.7M
- Other
- 5%$0.6M
Against the senate
How Kim compares to the typical member.
- Small-donor share
- 23%vs 19% senate median
- PAC share
- 6%vs 14% senate median
Who has a stake in Kim
The organizations behind the money.
Kim's largest organized backing comes from Jstreetpac. That counts the group's own PAC check plus the individual donations it bundled, not just the direct check.
Money organized for Kim
Jstreetpac›
$305K
Jstreetpac›
$305K
J Street's PAC, a liberal pro-Israel group that backs candidates supporting a two-state solution, often a counterweight to AIPAC.
Who it funds, across Congress
100% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $4.0M to 144 members
League Of Conservation Voters Action Fund›$117K
Who it funds, across Congress
99% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $939K to 148 members
Frontline Usa›$45K
Who it funds, across Congress
100% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $406K to 36 members
End Citizens United›$43K
Who it funds, across Congress
99% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $767K to 114 members
Outside spending, by party
Spent $988K to elect Democrats; $10.0M to defeat Republicans.
Zinc Collective PAC›$28K
Who it funds, across Congress
100% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $693K to 25 members
› What is organized money?
An organization reaches a member two ways. Its own PAC writes a direct check. And it bundles: it gathers individual donations from its supporters and routes them through its conduit. Both count here as one “organized” total. The bundled part is already inside the individual giving shown in the funding mix above. Here it is regrouped by the organization that gathered it, so you can see who did the organizing.
The same money, by industry
Which industries have a stake.
The same organized money, grouped by the industry of the organization that moved it. It shows the interests behind Kim's backing, not just the individual groups.
Plus $536K from organizations whose FEC name did not sort into an industry.
The money spent about Kim
Spent for or against.
Outside groups also spend on their own to elect or defeat Kim, running ads for or against the race. This money never passes through the campaign, so it is counted apart from the money organized for Kim.
Leadership With Integrity PAC$885K
To help Kim$885KTo hurt Kim—United 2024$325K
To help Kim—To hurt Kim$325KWorking New Jersey$310K
To help Kim$310KTo hurt Kim—With Honor Fund II,$40K
To help Kim$40KTo hurt Kim—End Citizens United$24K
To help Kim$24KTo hurt Kim—
Leadership With Integrity PAC›$885K—$885K
Leadership With Integrity PAC
United 2024—$325K$325K
Working New Jersey$310K—$310K
With Honor Fund II,$40K—$40K
End Citizens United$24K—$24K
FEC filings, 2019–2024 term · as of August 2026 · showing the top 5 funders of 192 organizations with a stake
About this data
FEC-disclosed receipts for the 2019–2024 term. This is the disclosed money only. Spending by outside groups that do not reveal their donors, the dark money that set a record in 2024, never appears in these figures.
Every percentage here is a share of all receipts, not of individual contributions only. So the small-donor share counts transfers, loans, and other money in its base, and can read higher than figures that divide only by individual money.
PAC figures are contributions to Kim's campaign committee from FEC filings. Industry labels are grouped from each committee's name and are approximate. Joint fundraising committees and small-dollar conduits like ActBlue and WinRed are not counted.
Support for requiring the groups that spend on elections to name their donors, across both parties. Congress has not passed the DISCLOSE Act.
Where Kim stands