U.S. Representative · CA · District 40
Young Kim
RepublicanTerm through January 2027
Funding profile · 2023–2024 cycle
25% of the money Kim raised came from small donors.
More grassroots-funded than 90% of the House.
Kim raised $9.2M across the two-year election cycle (2023–2024), and ended the period with $1.7M cash on hand. Here is where the money came from.
- Small donors
- 25%$2.3M
- Large donors
- 38%$3.5M
- Bundled
- 2%$0.2M
- PACs
- 23%$2.1M
- Other
- 12%$1.1M
Against the house
How Kim compares to the typical member.
- Small-donor share
- 25%vs 5% house median
- PAC share
- 23%vs 37% house median
Who has a stake in Kim
The organizations behind the money.
Kim's largest organized backing comes from AIPAC. That counts the group's own PAC check plus the individual donations it bundled, not just the direct check.
› $2.1M in PAC money not itemized by group
Kim collected $2.1M of PAC money through a joint fundraising committee, which pools contributions and transfers them as a lump sum. It is counted in the organized total above, but FEC filings do not itemize which PACs it came from at the campaign level, so it is not attributed to a named organization here.
Money organized for Kim
AIPAC›
$214K
AIPAC›
$214K
The American Israel Public Affairs Committee, a pro-Israel lobby that both gives directly and bundles individual donations; its super PAC (United Democracy Project) runs large independent campaigns in primaries.
Who it funds, across Congress
59% Democrats · 40% Republicans · $38.7M to 359 members
Outside spending, by party
Spent $13.9M to elect Democrats; $5.0M to defeat Democrats.
Republican Jewish Coalition PAC›$5K
Who it funds, across Congress
0% Democrats · 100% Republicans · $935K to 72 members
› What is organized money?
An organization reaches a member two ways. Its own PAC writes a direct check. And it bundles: it gathers individual donations from its supporters and routes them through its conduit. Both count here as one “organized” total. The bundled part is already inside the individual giving shown in the funding mix above. Here it is regrouped by the organization that gathered it, so you can see who did the organizing.
The same money, by industry
Which industries have a stake.
The same organized money, grouped by the industry of the organization that moved it. It shows the interests behind Kim's backing, not just the individual groups.
The money spent about Kim
Spent for or against.
Outside groups also spend on their own to elect or defeat Kim, running ads for or against the race. This money never passes through the campaign, so it is counted apart from the money organized for Kim.
Fairshake$1.9M
To help Kim$1.9MTo hurt Kim—Americans For Prosperity Action›$305K
To help Kim$305KTo hurt Kim—Americans for Prosperity Action, the super PAC of the Koch network, spending independently for mostly conservative candidates.
National Association Of Realtors$98K
To help Kim$98KTo hurt Kim—Care Action$12K
To help Kim$12KTo hurt Kim—National Rifle Association Of America Political Victory Fund›$3K
To help Kim$3KTo hurt Kim—The National Rifle Association's Political Victory Fund, its candidate-giving arm.
Fairshake$1.9M—$1.9M
Americans For Prosperity Action›$305K—$305K
Americans For Prosperity Action
Americans for Prosperity Action, the super PAC of the Koch network, spending independently for mostly conservative candidates.
National Association Of Realtors›$98K—$98K
National Association Of Realtors
Care Action$12K—$12K
National Rifle Association Of America Political Victory Fund›$3K—$3K
National Rifle Association Of America Political Victory Fund
The National Rifle Association's Political Victory Fund, its candidate-giving arm.
FEC filings, 2023–2024 cycle · as of August 2026 · showing the top 2 funders of 10 organizations with a stake
About this data
FEC-disclosed receipts for the 2023–2024 cycle. This is the disclosed money only. Spending by outside groups that do not reveal their donors, the dark money that set a record in 2024, never appears in these figures.
Every percentage here is a share of all receipts, not of individual contributions only. So the small-donor share counts transfers, loans, and other money in its base, and can read higher than figures that divide only by individual money.
Support for requiring the groups that spend on elections to name their donors, across both parties. Congress has not passed the DISCLOSE Act.
Where Kim stands