U.S. Senator · WY
Cynthia M. Lummis
RepublicanSenate Class 2Term through January 2027
Funding profile · 2015–2020 term
17% of the money Lummis raised came from small donors.
More grassroots-funded than 47% of the Senate.
Lummis raised $3.0M across the full six-year Senate term (2015–2020), and ended the period with $114K cash on hand. Here is where the money came from.
- Small donors
- 17%$0.5M
- Large donors
- 26%$0.8M
- Bundled
- 9%$0.3M
- PACs
- 27%$0.8M
- Other
- 21%$0.6M
Against the senate
How Lummis compares to the typical member.
- Small-donor share
- 17%vs 19% senate median
- PAC share
- 27%vs 14% senate median
Who has a stake in Lummis
The organizations behind the money.
Lummis's largest organized backing comes from Club For Growth. That counts the group's own PAC check plus the individual donations it bundled, not just the direct check.
› $808K in PAC money not itemized by group
Lummis collected $808K of PAC money through a joint fundraising committee, which pools contributions and transfers them as a lump sum. It is counted in the organized total above, but FEC filings do not itemize which PACs it came from at the campaign level, so it is not attributed to a named organization here.
Money organized for Lummis
Club For Growth›
$138K
Club For Growth›
$138K
Club for Growth's PAC and super PAC, backing anti-tax, small-government conservatives, often against Republican incumbents in primaries.
Who it funds, across Congress
0% Democrats · 100% Republicans · $2.7M to 39 members
Outside spending, by party
Spent $15.9M to elect Republicans; $27.5M to defeat Democrats.
Senate Conservatives Fund›$133K
The Senate Conservatives Fund, a hard-right super PAC that backs insurgent Republicans against the party establishment.
Who it funds, across Congress
0% Democrats · 100% Republicans · $2.2M to 18 members
Outside spending, by party
Spent $8.5M to elect Republicans; $375K to defeat Democrats.
› What is organized money?
An organization reaches a member two ways. Its own PAC writes a direct check. And it bundles: it gathers individual donations from its supporters and routes them through its conduit. Both count here as one “organized” total. The bundled part is already inside the individual giving shown in the funding mix above. Here it is regrouped by the organization that gathered it, so you can see who did the organizing.
The money spent about Lummis
Spent for or against.
Outside groups also spend on their own to elect or defeat Lummis, running ads for or against the race. This money never passes through the campaign, so it is counted apart from the money organized for Lummis.
Senate Conservatives Fund›$762K
To help Lummis$762KTo hurt Lummis—The Senate Conservatives Fund, a hard-right super PAC that backs insurgent Republicans against the party establishment.
Club For Growth›$17K
To help Lummis$17KTo hurt Lummis—Club for Growth's PAC and super PAC, backing anti-tax, small-government conservatives, often against Republican incumbents in primaries.
National Rifle Association Of America Political Victory Fund›$2K
To help Lummis$2KTo hurt Lummis—The National Rifle Association's Political Victory Fund, its candidate-giving arm.
Senate Conservatives Fund›$762K—$762K
Senate Conservatives Fund
The Senate Conservatives Fund, a hard-right super PAC that backs insurgent Republicans against the party establishment.
Club For Growth›$17K—$17K
Club For Growth
Club for Growth's PAC and super PAC, backing anti-tax, small-government conservatives, often against Republican incumbents in primaries.
National Rifle Association Of America Political Victory Fund›$2K—$2K
National Rifle Association Of America Political Victory Fund
The National Rifle Association's Political Victory Fund, its candidate-giving arm.
FEC filings, 2015–2020 term · as of August 2026 · showing the top 2 funders of 3 organizations with a stake
About this data
FEC-disclosed receipts for the 2015–2020 term. This is the disclosed money only. Spending by outside groups that do not reveal their donors, the dark money that set a record in 2024, never appears in these figures.
Every percentage here is a share of all receipts, not of individual contributions only. So the small-donor share counts transfers, loans, and other money in its base, and can read higher than figures that divide only by individual money.
Support for requiring the groups that spend on elections to name their donors, across both parties. Congress has not passed the DISCLOSE Act.
Where Lummis stands