U.S. Senator · UT
Mike Lee
RepublicanSenate Class 3Term through January 2029
Funding profile · 2017–2022 term
24% of the money Lee raised came from small donors.
More grassroots-funded than 62% of the Senate.
Lee raised $12.7M across the full six-year Senate term (2017–2022), and ended the period with $956K cash on hand. Here is where the money came from.
- Small donors
- 24%$3.1M
- Large donors
- 43%$5.5M
- Bundled
- 4%$0.5M
- PACs
- 17%$2.2M
- Other
- 12%$1.5M
Against the senate
How Lee compares to the typical member.
- Small-donor share
- 24%vs 19% senate median
- PAC share
- 17%vs 14% senate median
Who has a stake in Lee
The organizations behind the money.
Lee's largest organized backing comes from Club For Growth. That counts the group's own PAC check plus the individual donations it bundled, not just the direct check.
Money organized for Lee
Club For Growth›
$187K
Club For Growth›
$187K
Club for Growth's PAC and super PAC, backing anti-tax, small-government conservatives, often against Republican incumbents in primaries.
Who it funds, across Congress
0% Democrats · 100% Republicans · $2.7M to 39 members
Outside spending, by party
Spent $15.9M to elect Republicans; $27.5M to defeat Democrats.
Senate Conservatives Fund›$164K
The Senate Conservatives Fund, a hard-right super PAC that backs insurgent Republicans against the party establishment.
Who it funds, across Congress
0% Democrats · 100% Republicans · $2.2M to 18 members
Outside spending, by party
Spent $8.5M to elect Republicans; $375K to defeat Democrats.
Votesane PAC›$137K
Who it funds, across Congress
40% Democrats · 60% Republicans · $2.6M to 42 members
Freedomworks Victory 2022›$43K
Who it funds, across Congress
0% Democrats · 100% Republicans · $43K to 1 members
American Society Of Travel Agents PAC›$15K
Who it funds, across Congress
47% Democrats · 52% Republicans · $226K to 46 members
› What is organized money?
An organization reaches a member two ways. Its own PAC writes a direct check. And it bundles: it gathers individual donations from its supporters and routes them through its conduit. Both count here as one “organized” total. The bundled part is already inside the individual giving shown in the funding mix above. Here it is regrouped by the organization that gathered it, so you can see who did the organizing.
The same money, by industry
Which industries have a stake.
The same organized money, grouped by the industry of the organization that moved it. It shows the interests behind Lee's backing, not just the individual groups.
Plus $1.0M from organizations whose FEC name did not sort into an industry.
The money spent about Lee
Spent for or against.
Outside groups also spend on their own to elect or defeat Lee, running ads for or against the race. This money never passes through the campaign, so it is counted apart from the money organized for Lee.
Put Utah First PAC$4.6M
To help Lee—To hurt Lee$4.6MClub For Growth›$1.7M
To help Lee$1.7MTo hurt Lee—Club for Growth's PAC and super PAC, backing anti-tax, small-government conservatives, often against Republican incumbents in primaries.
Liberty Champions$1.6M
To help Lee$1.6MTo hurt Lee—Americans For Prosperity Action›$1.2M
To help Lee$1.2MTo hurt Lee—Americans for Prosperity Action, the super PAC of the Koch network, spending independently for mostly conservative candidates.
Protect Freedom PAC$677K
To help Lee$677KTo hurt Lee—
Put Utah First PAC—$4.6M$4.6M
Club For Growth›$1.7M—$1.7M
Club For Growth
Club for Growth's PAC and super PAC, backing anti-tax, small-government conservatives, often against Republican incumbents in primaries.
Liberty Champions$1.6M—$1.6M
Americans For Prosperity Action›$1.2M—$1.2M
Americans For Prosperity Action
Americans for Prosperity Action, the super PAC of the Koch network, spending independently for mostly conservative candidates.
Protect Freedom PAC$677K—$677K
FEC filings, 2017–2022 term · as of August 2026 · showing the top 5 funders of 339 organizations with a stake
About this data
FEC-disclosed receipts for the 2017–2022 term. This is the disclosed money only. Spending by outside groups that do not reveal their donors, the dark money that set a record in 2024, never appears in these figures.
Every percentage here is a share of all receipts, not of individual contributions only. So the small-donor share counts transfers, loans, and other money in its base, and can read higher than figures that divide only by individual money.
PAC figures are contributions to Lee's campaign committee from FEC filings. Industry labels are grouped from each committee's name and are approximate. Joint fundraising committees and small-dollar conduits like ActBlue and WinRed are not counted.
Support for requiring the groups that spend on elections to name their donors, across both parties. Congress has not passed the DISCLOSE Act.
Where Lee stands