Skip to content
Project Curia

Financing

U.S. Senator · CT

Christopher Murphy

DemocratSenate Class 1Term through January 2031

Funding profile · 2019–2024 term

31% of the money Murphy raised came from small donors.

More grassroots-funded than 74% of the Senate.

Murphy raised $15.3M across the full six-year Senate term (2019–2024), and ended the period with $5.5M cash on hand. Here is where the money came from.

31%from small donors
Small donors
31%$4.8M
Large donors
65%$9.9M
Bundled
0%$0.0M
PACs
0%$0.1M
Other
4%$0.6M

Against the senate

How Murphy compares to the typical member.

Small-donor share
31%vs 19% senate median
PAC share
0%vs 14% senate median

Who has a stake in Murphy

The organizations behind the money.

Murphy's largest organized backing comes from Leahy For U.S. Senator Committee. That counts the group's own PAC check plus the individual donations it bundled, not just the direct check.

$56K in PAC money not itemized by group

Murphy collected $56K of PAC money through a joint fundraising committee, which pools contributions and transfers them as a lump sum. It is counted in the organized total above, but FEC filings do not itemize which PACs it came from at the campaign level, so it is not attributed to a named organization here.

Money organized for Murphy

Leahy For U.S. Senator Committee

$4K

Who it funds, across Congress

92% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $53K to 13 members

Cummins Inc. PAC$3K

Who it funds, across Congress

50% Democrats · 49% Republicans · $187K to 94 members

Brady PAC$3K

Who it funds, across Congress

95% Democrats · 5% Republicans · $19K to 7 members

Outside spending, by party

Spent $3K to elect Democrats; $10K to defeat Republicans.

Jstreetpac$2K

J Street's PAC, a liberal pro-Israel group that backs candidates supporting a two-state solution, often a counterweight to AIPAC.

Who it funds, across Congress

100% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $4.0M to 144 members

What is organized money?

An organization reaches a member two ways. Its own PAC writes a direct check. And it bundles: it gathers individual donations from its supporters and routes them through its conduit. Both count here as one “organized” total. The bundled part is already inside the individual giving shown in the funding mix above. Here it is regrouped by the organization that gathered it, so you can see who did the organizing.

FEC filings, 2019–2024 term · as of August 2026 · showing the top 4 funders of 4 organizations with a stake

About this data

FEC-disclosed receipts for the 2019–2024 term. This is the disclosed money only. Spending by outside groups that do not reveal their donors, the dark money that set a record in 2024, never appears in these figures.

Every percentage here is a share of all receipts, not of individual contributions only. So the small-donor share counts transfers, loans, and other money in its base, and can read higher than figures that divide only by individual money.

84%want dark money disclosed

Support for requiring the groups that spend on elections to name their donors, across both parties. Congress has not passed the DISCLOSE Act.

Where Murphy stands