Skip to content
Project Curia

← Financing

U.S. Representative · CA · District 47

Dave Min

DemocratTerm through January 2027

Funding profile · 2023–2024 cycle

13% of the money Min raised came from small donors.

More grassroots-funded than 76% of the House.

Min raised $6.8M across the two-year election cycle (2023–2024), and ended the period with $173K cash on hand. Here is where the money came from.

13%from small donors
Small donors
13%$0.9M
Large donors
70%$4.8M
Bundled
1%$0.1M
PACs
10%$0.7M
Other
6%$0.4M

Against the house

How Min compares to the typical member.

Small-donor share
13%vs 5% house median
PAC share
10%vs 37% house median

Who has a stake in Min

The organizations behind the money.

Min's largest organized backing comes from Ameripac: The Fund For A Greater America. That counts the group's own PAC check plus the individual donations it bundled, not just the direct check.

Money organized for Min

Ameripac: The Fund For A Greater America›

$24K

Who it funds, across Congress

100% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $1.0M to 79 members

Zinc Collective PAC›$22K

Who it funds, across Congress

100% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $693K to 25 members

Frontline Usa›$15K

Who it funds, across Congress

100% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $406K to 36 members

DCCC›$11K

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the party committee for electing House Democrats.

Who it funds, across Congress

94% Democrats · 6% Republicans · $115K to 15 members

Outside spending, by party

Spent $3.1M to elect Democrats; $28.8M to defeat Republicans.

American Federation Of State County & Municipal Employees P E O P L E›$10K

AFSCME's political fund, representing state, county, and municipal public employees.

Who it funds, across Congress

99% Democrats · 1% Republicans · $1.9M to 225 members

Outside spending, by party

Spent $3.9M to elect Democrats; $6.0M to defeat Republicans.

› What is organized money?

An organization reaches a member two ways. Its own PAC writes a direct check. And it bundles: it gathers individual donations from its supporters and routes them through its conduit. Both count here as one “organized” total. The bundled part is already inside the individual giving shown in the funding mix above. Here it is regrouped by the organization that gathered it, so you can see who did the organizing.

The same money, by industry

Which industries have a stake.

The same organized money, grouped by the industry of the organization that moved it. It shows the interests behind Min's backing, not just the individual groups.

$143KLabor
$47KIdeological
$30KHealth
$17KDefense
$13KEnergy

Plus $312K from organizations whose FEC name did not sort into an industry.

The money spent about Min

Spent for or against.

Outside groups also spend on their own to elect or defeat Min, running ads for or against the race. This money never passes through the campaign, so it is counted apart from the money organized for Min.

All outside groups34% to help, 66% to hurt$13.0M
  1. AIPAC›$4.6M
    To help Min
    —
    To hurt Min
    $4.6M

    The American Israel Public Affairs Committee, a pro-Israel lobby that both gives directly and bundles individual donations; its super PAC (United Democracy Project) runs large independent campaigns in primaries.

  2. Club For Growth›$2.1M
    To help Min
    —
    To hurt Min
    $2.1M

    Club for Growth's PAC and super PAC, backing anti-tax, small-government conservatives, often against Republican incumbents in primaries.

  3. LCV Victory Fund›$1.3M
    To help Min
    $1.3M
    To hurt Min
    —

    The League of Conservation Voters' super PAC, spending on environmental-minded candidates.

  4. Win It Back PAC$1.2M
    To help Min
    —
    To hurt Min
    $1.2M
  5. House Majority PAC›$892K
    To help Min
    $892K
    To hurt Min
    —

    The super PAC aligned with House Democratic leadership.

FEC filings, 2023–2024 cycle · as of August 2026 · showing the top 5 funders of 161 organizations with a stake

About this data

FEC-disclosed receipts for the 2023–2024 cycle. This is the disclosed money only. Spending by outside groups that do not reveal their donors, the dark money that set a record in 2024, never appears in these figures.

Every percentage here is a share of all receipts, not of individual contributions only. So the small-donor share counts transfers, loans, and other money in its base, and can read higher than figures that divide only by individual money.

PAC figures are contributions to Min's campaign committee from FEC filings. Industry labels are grouped from each committee's name and are approximate. Joint fundraising committees and small-dollar conduits like ActBlue and WinRed are not counted.

84%want dark money disclosed

Support for requiring the groups that spend on elections to name their donors, across both parties. Congress has not passed the DISCLOSE Act.

Where Min stands