U.S. Senator · GA
Jon Ossoff
DemocratSenate Class 2Term through January 2027
Funding profile · 2015–2020 term
45% of the money Ossoff raised came from small donors.
More grassroots-funded than 93% of the Senate.
Ossoff raised $156.1M across the full six-year Senate term (2015–2020), and ended the period with $4.3M cash on hand. Here is where the money came from.
- Small donors
- 45%$69.7M
- Large donors
- 48%$75.3M
- Bundled
- 0%$0.2M
- PACs
- 1%$0.9M
- Other
- 6%$10.1M
Against the senate
How Ossoff compares to the typical member.
- Small-donor share
- 45%vs 19% senate median
- PAC share
- 1%vs 14% senate median
Who has a stake in Ossoff
The organizations behind the money.
Ossoff's largest organized backing comes from Jstreetpac. That counts the group's own PAC check plus the individual donations it bundled, not just the direct check.
› $827K in PAC money not itemized by group
Ossoff collected $827K of PAC money through a joint fundraising committee, which pools contributions and transfers them as a lump sum. It is counted in the organized total above, but FEC filings do not itemize which PACs it came from at the campaign level, so it is not attributed to a named organization here.
Money organized for Ossoff
Jstreetpac›
$81K
Jstreetpac›
$81K
J Street's PAC, a liberal pro-Israel group that backs candidates supporting a two-state solution, often a counterweight to AIPAC.
Who it funds, across Congress
100% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $4.0M to 144 members
Swing Left›$34K
Who it funds, across Congress
100% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $895K to 34 members
Reproductive Freedom For All PAC›$13K
Who it funds, across Congress
99% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $375K to 65 members
League Of Conservation Voters Action Fund›$13K
Who it funds, across Congress
99% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $939K to 148 members
End Citizens United›$11K
Who it funds, across Congress
99% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $767K to 114 members
Outside spending, by party
Spent $988K to elect Democrats; $10.0M to defeat Republicans.
› What is organized money?
An organization reaches a member two ways. Its own PAC writes a direct check. And it bundles: it gathers individual donations from its supporters and routes them through its conduit. Both count here as one “organized” total. The bundled part is already inside the individual giving shown in the funding mix above. Here it is regrouped by the organization that gathered it, so you can see who did the organizing. Ossoffreceived so many small earmarked donations that these figures count only the largest ones. Read every total as “at least.”
The same money, by industry
Which industries have a stake.
The same organized money, grouped by the industry of the organization that moved it. It shows the interests behind Ossoff's backing, not just the individual groups.
Plus $113K from organizations whose FEC name did not sort into an industry.
The money spent about Ossoff
Spent for or against.
Outside groups also spend on their own to elect or defeat Ossoff, running ads for or against the race. This money never passes through the campaign, so it is counted apart from the money organized for Ossoff.
Senate Leadership Fund›$92.2M
To help Ossoff—To hurt Ossoff$92.2MThe super PAC aligned with Senate Republican leadership.
NRSC›$13.8M
To help Ossoff—To hurt Ossoff$13.8MThe National Republican Senatorial Committee, the party committee for electing Senate Republicans.
Peachtree PAC$12.4M
To help Ossoff—To hurt Ossoff$12.4MGeorgia Action Fund$4.6M
To help Ossoff—To hurt Ossoff$4.6MBlackpac$4.3M
To help Ossoff$4.3MTo hurt Ossoff—
Senate Leadership Fund›—$92.2M$92.2M
Senate Leadership Fund
The super PAC aligned with Senate Republican leadership.
NRSC›—$13.8M$13.8M
NRSC
The National Republican Senatorial Committee, the party committee for electing Senate Republicans.
Peachtree PAC—$12.4M$12.4M
Georgia Action Fund—$4.6M$4.6M
Blackpac$4.3M—$4.3M
FEC filings, 2015–2020 term · as of August 2026 · showing the top 5 funders of 160 organizations with a stake
About this data
FEC-disclosed receipts for the 2015–2020 term. This is the disclosed money only. Spending by outside groups that do not reveal their donors, the dark money that set a record in 2024, never appears in these figures.
Every percentage here is a share of all receipts, not of individual contributions only. So the small-donor share counts transfers, loans, and other money in its base, and can read higher than figures that divide only by individual money.
Support for requiring the groups that spend on elections to name their donors, across both parties. Congress has not passed the DISCLOSE Act.
Where Ossoff stands