U.S. Representative · IN · District 5
Victoria Spartz
RepublicanTerm through January 2027
Funding profile · 2023–2024 cycle
21% of the money Spartz raised came from small donors.
More grassroots-funded than 88% of the House.
Spartz raised $2.0M across the two-year election cycle (2023–2024), and ended the period with $258K cash on hand. Here is where the money came from.
- Small donors
- 21%$0.4M
- Large donors
- 28%$0.6M
- Bundled
- 2%$0.0M
- PACs
- 10%$0.2M
- Other
- 40%$0.8M
Against the house
How Spartz compares to the typical member.
- Small-donor share
- 21%vs 5% house median
- PAC share
- 10%vs 37% house median
Who has a stake in Spartz
The organizations behind the money.
Spartz's largest organized backing comes from AIPAC. That counts the group's own PAC check plus the individual donations it bundled, not just the direct check.
Money organized for Spartz
AIPAC›
$32K
AIPAC›
$32K
The American Israel Public Affairs Committee, a pro-Israel lobby that both gives directly and bundles individual donations; its super PAC (United Democracy Project) runs large independent campaigns in primaries.
Who it funds, across Congress
59% Democrats · 40% Republicans · $38.7M to 359 members
Outside spending, by party
Spent $13.9M to elect Democrats; $5.0M to defeat Democrats.
American Institute Of Certified Public Accountants PAC›$10K
The American Institute of CPAs' PAC, representing the accounting profession.
Who it funds, across Congress
45% Democrats · 55% Republicans · $1.7M to 255 members
Making A Sensible Shift In Elections PAC›$10K
Who it funds, across Congress
0% Democrats · 100% Republicans · $15K to 4 members
Eye Of The Tiger PAC›$10K
Eye of the Tiger PAC, a Republican leadership PAC.
Who it funds, across Congress
0% Democrats · 99% Republicans · $1.1M to 133 members
Lets Get To Work PAC›$10K
Who it funds, across Congress
0% Democrats · 100% Republicans · $298K to 33 members
› What is organized money?
An organization reaches a member two ways. Its own PAC writes a direct check. And it bundles: it gathers individual donations from its supporters and routes them through its conduit. Both count here as one “organized” total. The bundled part is already inside the individual giving shown in the funding mix above. Here it is regrouped by the organization that gathered it, so you can see who did the organizing.
The same money, by industry
Which industries have a stake.
The same organized money, grouped by the industry of the organization that moved it. It shows the interests behind Spartz's backing, not just the individual groups.
Plus $95K from organizations whose FEC name did not sort into an industry.
The money spent about Spartz
Spent for or against.
Outside groups also spend on their own to elect or defeat Spartz, running ads for or against the race. This money never passes through the campaign, so it is counted apart from the money organized for Spartz.
Principled Leaders PAC$75K
To help Spartz—To hurt Spartz$75KNational Victory Action Fund$50K
To help Spartz$50KTo hurt Spartz—Protect Freedom PAC$10K
To help Spartz$10KTo hurt Spartz—
Principled Leaders PAC—$75K$75K
National Victory Action Fund›$50K—$50K
National Victory Action Fund
Protect Freedom PAC$10K—$10K
FEC filings, 2023–2024 cycle · as of August 2026 · showing the top 5 funders of 49 organizations with a stake
About this data
FEC-disclosed receipts for the 2023–2024 cycle. This is the disclosed money only. Spending by outside groups that do not reveal their donors, the dark money that set a record in 2024, never appears in these figures.
Every percentage here is a share of all receipts, not of individual contributions only. So the small-donor share counts transfers, loans, and other money in its base, and can read higher than figures that divide only by individual money.
PAC figures are contributions to Spartz's campaign committee from FEC filings. Industry labels are grouped from each committee's name and are approximate. Joint fundraising committees and small-dollar conduits like ActBlue and WinRed are not counted.
Support for requiring the groups that spend on elections to name their donors, across both parties. Congress has not passed the DISCLOSE Act.
Where Spartz stands