U.S. Representative · IL · District 9
Janice D. Schakowsky
DemocratTerm through January 2027
Funding profile · 2023–2024 cycle
10% of the money Schakowsky raised came from small donors.
More grassroots-funded than 68% of the House.
Schakowsky raised $1.6M across the two-year election cycle (2023–2024), and ended the period with $848K cash on hand. Here is where the money came from.
- Small donors
- 10%$0.2M
- Large donors
- 57%$0.9M
- Bundled
- 1%$0.0M
- PACs
- 32%$0.5M
- Other
- 0%$0.0M
Against the house
How Schakowsky compares to the typical member.
- Small-donor share
- 10%vs 5% house median
- PAC share
- 32%vs 37% house median
Who has a stake in Schakowsky
The organizations behind the money.
Schakowsky's largest organized backing comes from Jstreetpac. That counts the group's own PAC check plus the individual donations it bundled, not just the direct check.
Money organized for Schakowsky
Jstreetpac›
$14K
Jstreetpac›
$14K
J Street's PAC, a liberal pro-Israel group that backs candidates supporting a two-state solution, often a counterweight to AIPAC.
Who it funds, across Congress
100% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $4.0M to 144 members
Local 881 United Food And Commercial Workers Political Action Fund›$10K
Who it funds, across Congress
100% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $108K to 13 members
Carpenters Legislative Improvement Committee›$10K
The Carpenters union's political committee, representing carpentry and construction trades.
Who it funds, across Congress
85% Democrats · 13% Republicans · $1.8M to 216 members
1-800 Contacts, Inc. PAC›$10K
Who it funds, across Congress
53% Democrats · 47% Republicans · $118K to 28 members
Machinists Non Partisan Political League Of The International Association Of Machinists &›$10K
The political arm of the Machinists union (IAM), representing aerospace, airline, and manufacturing workers.
Who it funds, across Congress
98% Democrats · 1% Republicans · $2.0M to 230 members
› What is organized money?
An organization reaches a member two ways. Its own PAC writes a direct check. And it bundles: it gathers individual donations from its supporters and routes them through its conduit. Both count here as one “organized” total. The bundled part is already inside the individual giving shown in the funding mix above. Here it is regrouped by the organization that gathered it, so you can see who did the organizing.
The same money, by industry
Which industries have a stake.
The same organized money, grouped by the industry of the organization that moved it. It shows the interests behind Schakowsky's backing, not just the individual groups.
Plus $106K from organizations whose FEC name did not sort into an industry.
FEC filings, 2023–2024 cycle · as of August 2026 · showing the top 5 funders of 119 organizations with a stake
About this data
FEC-disclosed receipts for the 2023–2024 cycle. This is the disclosed money only. Spending by outside groups that do not reveal their donors, the dark money that set a record in 2024, never appears in these figures.
Every percentage here is a share of all receipts, not of individual contributions only. So the small-donor share counts transfers, loans, and other money in its base, and can read higher than figures that divide only by individual money.
PAC figures are contributions to Schakowsky's campaign committee from FEC filings. Industry labels are grouped from each committee's name and are approximate. Joint fundraising committees and small-dollar conduits like ActBlue and WinRed are not counted.
Support for requiring the groups that spend on elections to name their donors, across both parties. Congress has not passed the DISCLOSE Act.
Where Schakowsky stands