U.S. Senator · SC
Tim Scott
RepublicanSenate Class 3Term through January 2029
Funding profile · 2017–2022 term
39% of the money Scott raised came from small donors.
More grassroots-funded than 85% of the Senate.
Scott raised $54.0M across the full six-year Senate term (2017–2022), and ended the period with $21.8M cash on hand. Here is where the money came from.
- Small donors
- 39%$21.0M
- Large donors
- 49%$26.3M
- Bundled
- 0%$0.2M
- PACs
- 8%$4.4M
- Other
- 4%$2.0M
Against the senate
How Scott compares to the typical member.
- Small-donor share
- 39%vs 19% senate median
- PAC share
- 8%vs 14% senate median
Who has a stake in Scott
The organizations behind the money.
Scott's largest organized backing comes from Votesane PAC. That counts the group's own PAC check plus the individual donations it bundled, not just the direct check.
Money organized for Scott
Votesane PAC›
$157K
Votesane PAC›
$157K
Who it funds, across Congress
40% Democrats · 60% Republicans · $2.6M to 42 members
Pro-Israel America PAC›$31K
Who it funds, across Congress
26% Democrats · 74% Republicans · $693K to 19 members
NORPAC›$25K
A pro-Israel political action committee that bundles individual donations to candidates it judges supportive of the U.S. relationship with Israel.
Who it funds, across Congress
40% Democrats · 59% Republicans · $2.2M to 82 members
Making A Responsible Stand For Households In America PAC›$20K
Who it funds, across Congress
0% Democrats · 100% Republicans · $223K to 25 members
No Labels Problem Solvers PAC›$19K
Who it funds, across Congress
15% Democrats · 85% Republicans · $1.5M to 25 members
› What is organized money?
An organization reaches a member two ways. Its own PAC writes a direct check. And it bundles: it gathers individual donations from its supporters and routes them through its conduit. Both count here as one “organized” total. The bundled part is already inside the individual giving shown in the funding mix above. Here it is regrouped by the organization that gathered it, so you can see who did the organizing. Scottreceived so many small earmarked donations that these figures count only the largest ones. Read every total as “at least.”
The same money, by industry
Which industries have a stake.
The same organized money, grouped by the industry of the organization that moved it. It shows the interests behind Scott's backing, not just the individual groups.
Plus $1.4M from organizations whose FEC name did not sort into an industry.
The money spent about Scott
Spent for or against.
Outside groups also spend on their own to elect or defeat Scott, running ads for or against the race. This money never passes through the campaign, so it is counted apart from the money organized for Scott.
Opportunity Matters Fund$1.3M
To help Scott$1.3MTo hurt Scott—National Victory Action Fund$1.1M
To help Scott$1.1MTo hurt Scott—Elbert Guillory'S America$261K
To help Scott$261KTo hurt Scott—Honoring American Law Enforcement PAC$196K
To help Scott$196KTo hurt Scott—Law Enforcement For A Safer America PAC$132K
To help Scott$132KTo hurt Scott—
Opportunity Matters Fund›$1.3M—$1.3M
Opportunity Matters Fund
National Victory Action Fund›$1.1M—$1.1M
National Victory Action Fund
Elbert Guillory'S America›$261K—$261K
Elbert Guillory'S America
Honoring American Law Enforcement PAC›$196K—$196K
Honoring American Law Enforcement PAC
Law Enforcement For A Safer America PAC›$132K—$132K
Law Enforcement For A Safer America PAC
FEC filings, 2017–2022 term · as of August 2026 · showing the top 5 funders of 670 organizations with a stake
About this data
FEC-disclosed receipts for the 2017–2022 term. This is the disclosed money only. Spending by outside groups that do not reveal their donors, the dark money that set a record in 2024, never appears in these figures.
Every percentage here is a share of all receipts, not of individual contributions only. So the small-donor share counts transfers, loans, and other money in its base, and can read higher than figures that divide only by individual money.
PAC figures are contributions to Scott's campaign committee from FEC filings. Industry labels are grouped from each committee's name and are approximate. Joint fundraising committees and small-dollar conduits like ActBlue and WinRed are not counted.
Support for requiring the groups that spend on elections to name their donors, across both parties. Congress has not passed the DISCLOSE Act.
Where Scott stands