U.S. Representative · NY · District 21
Elise M. Stefanik
RepublicanTerm through January 2027
Funding profile · 2023–2024 cycle
17% of the money Stefanik raised came from small donors.
More grassroots-funded than 85% of the House.
Stefanik raised $15.5M across the two-year election cycle (2023–2024), and ended the period with $8.7M cash on hand. Here is where the money came from.
- Small donors
- 17%$2.6M
- Large donors
- 12%$1.9M
- Bundled
- 7%$1.0M
- PACs
- 7%$1.1M
- Other
- 57%$8.9M
Against the house
How Stefanik compares to the typical member.
- Small-donor share
- 17%vs 5% house median
- PAC share
- 7%vs 37% house median
Who has a stake in Stefanik
The organizations behind the money.
Stefanik's largest organized backing comes from Team Elise. That counts the group's own PAC check plus the individual donations it bundled, not just the direct check.
Money organized for Stefanik
Team Elise›
$617K
Team Elise›
$617K
Who it funds, across Congress
0% Democrats · 100% Republicans · $617K to 1 members
AIPAC›$379K
The American Israel Public Affairs Committee, a pro-Israel lobby that both gives directly and bundles individual donations; its super PAC (United Democracy Project) runs large independent campaigns in primaries.
Who it funds, across Congress
59% Democrats · 40% Republicans · $38.7M to 359 members
Outside spending, by party
Spent $13.9M to elect Democrats; $5.0M to defeat Democrats.
House Gop Battleground Fund›$32K
Who it funds, across Congress
0% Democrats · 100% Republicans · $32K to 1 members
NORPAC›$20K
A pro-Israel political action committee that bundles individual donations to candidates it judges supportive of the U.S. relationship with Israel.
Who it funds, across Congress
40% Democrats · 59% Republicans · $2.2M to 82 members
Union Pacific Corp Fund For Effective Goverment›$10K
Who it funds, across Congress
28% Democrats · 71% Republicans · $1.0M to 189 members
› What is organized money?
An organization reaches a member two ways. Its own PAC writes a direct check. And it bundles: it gathers individual donations from its supporters and routes them through its conduit. Both count here as one “organized” total. The bundled part is already inside the individual giving shown in the funding mix above. Here it is regrouped by the organization that gathered it, so you can see who did the organizing.
The same money, by industry
Which industries have a stake.
The same organized money, grouped by the industry of the organization that moved it. It shows the interests behind Stefanik's backing, not just the individual groups.
Plus $909K from organizations whose FEC name did not sort into an industry.
FEC filings, 2023–2024 cycle · as of August 2026 · showing the top 5 funders of 228 organizations with a stake
About this data
FEC-disclosed receipts for the 2023–2024 cycle. This is the disclosed money only. Spending by outside groups that do not reveal their donors, the dark money that set a record in 2024, never appears in these figures.
Every percentage here is a share of all receipts, not of individual contributions only. So the small-donor share counts transfers, loans, and other money in its base, and can read higher than figures that divide only by individual money.
PAC figures are contributions to Stefanik's campaign committee from FEC filings. Industry labels are grouped from each committee's name and are approximate. Joint fundraising committees and small-dollar conduits like ActBlue and WinRed are not counted.
Support for requiring the groups that spend on elections to name their donors, across both parties. Congress has not passed the DISCLOSE Act.
Where Stefanik stands