U.S. Senator · MI
Elissa Slotkin
DemocratSenate Class 1Term through January 2031
Funding profile · 2019–2024 term
32% of the money Slotkin raised came from small donors.
More grassroots-funded than 79% of the Senate.
Slotkin raised $51.9M across the full six-year Senate term (2019–2024), and ended the period with $283K cash on hand. Here is where the money came from.
- Small donors
- 32%$16.8M
- Large donors
- 57%$29.6M
- Bundled
- 0%$0.1M
- PACs
- 2%$1.2M
- Other
- 8%$4.2M
Against the senate
How Slotkin compares to the typical member.
- Small-donor share
- 32%vs 19% senate median
- PAC share
- 2%vs 14% senate median
Who has a stake in Slotkin
The organizations behind the money.
Slotkin's largest organized backing comes from Emily'S List. That counts the group's own PAC check plus the individual donations it bundled, not just the direct check.
Money organized for Slotkin
Emily'S List›
$62K
Emily'S List›
$62K
EMILY's List's PAC, which backs Democratic women who support abortion rights.
Who it funds, across Congress
100% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $2.4M to 47 members
Swing Left›$45K
Who it funds, across Congress
100% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $895K to 34 members
Jdca PAC›$23K
Who it funds, across Congress
100% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $98K to 12 members
Outside spending, by party
Spent $829K to elect Democrats.
Frontline Usa›$13K
Who it funds, across Congress
100% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $406K to 36 members
Perimeter PAC›$13K
Who it funds, across Congress
97% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $347K to 46 members
› What is organized money?
An organization reaches a member two ways. Its own PAC writes a direct check. And it bundles: it gathers individual donations from its supporters and routes them through its conduit. Both count here as one “organized” total. The bundled part is already inside the individual giving shown in the funding mix above. Here it is regrouped by the organization that gathered it, so you can see who did the organizing. Slotkinreceived so many small earmarked donations that these figures count only the largest ones. Read every total as “at least.”
The same money, by industry
Which industries have a stake.
The same organized money, grouped by the industry of the organization that moved it. It shows the interests behind Slotkin's backing, not just the individual groups.
Plus $609K from organizations whose FEC name did not sort into an industry.
The money spent about Slotkin
Spent for or against.
Outside groups also spend on their own to elect or defeat Slotkin, running ads for or against the race. This money never passes through the campaign, so it is counted apart from the money organized for Slotkin.
Senate Leadership Fund›$32.3M
To help Slotkin—To hurt Slotkin$32.3MThe super PAC aligned with Senate Republican leadership.
NRSC›$11.0M
To help Slotkin—To hurt Slotkin$11.0MThe National Republican Senatorial Committee, the party committee for electing Senate Republicans.
Protect Progress$10.0M
To help Slotkin$10.0MTo hurt Slotkin—Americans For Prosperity Action›$5.3M
To help Slotkin—To hurt Slotkin$5.3MAmericans for Prosperity Action, the super PAC of the Koch network, spending independently for mostly conservative candidates.
Glcf,$4.5M
To help Slotkin—To hurt Slotkin$4.5M
Senate Leadership Fund›—$32.3M$32.3M
Senate Leadership Fund
The super PAC aligned with Senate Republican leadership.
NRSC›—$11.0M$11.0M
NRSC
The National Republican Senatorial Committee, the party committee for electing Senate Republicans.
Protect Progress$10.0M—$10.0M
Americans For Prosperity Action›—$5.3M$5.3M
Americans For Prosperity Action
Americans for Prosperity Action, the super PAC of the Koch network, spending independently for mostly conservative candidates.
Glcf,—$4.5M$4.5M
FEC filings, 2019–2024 term · as of August 2026 · showing the top 5 funders of 230 organizations with a stake
About this data
FEC-disclosed receipts for the 2019–2024 term. This is the disclosed money only. Spending by outside groups that do not reveal their donors, the dark money that set a record in 2024, never appears in these figures.
Every percentage here is a share of all receipts, not of individual contributions only. So the small-donor share counts transfers, loans, and other money in its base, and can read higher than figures that divide only by individual money.
PAC figures are contributions to Slotkin's campaign committee from FEC filings. Industry labels are grouped from each committee's name and are approximate. Joint fundraising committees and small-dollar conduits like ActBlue and WinRed are not counted.
Support for requiring the groups that spend on elections to name their donors, across both parties. Congress has not passed the DISCLOSE Act.
Where Slotkin stands