U.S. Representative · WA · District 8
Kim Schrier
DemocratTerm through January 2027
Funding profile · 2023–2024 cycle
9% of the money Schrier raised came from small donors.
More grassroots-funded than 64% of the House.
Schrier raised $6.5M across the two-year election cycle (2023–2024), and ended the period with $1.8M cash on hand. Here is where the money came from.
- Small donors
- 9%$0.6M
- Large donors
- 67%$4.4M
- Bundled
- 2%$0.1M
- PACs
- 20%$1.3M
- Other
- 2%$0.2M
Against the house
How Schrier compares to the typical member.
- Small-donor share
- 9%vs 5% house median
- PAC share
- 20%vs 37% house median
Who has a stake in Schrier
The organizations behind the money.
Schrier's largest organized backing comes from AIPAC. That counts the group's own PAC check plus the individual donations it bundled, not just the direct check.
Money organized for Schrier
AIPAC›
$61K
AIPAC›
$61K
The American Israel Public Affairs Committee, a pro-Israel lobby that both gives directly and bundles individual donations; its super PAC (United Democracy Project) runs large independent campaigns in primaries.
Who it funds, across Congress
59% Democrats · 40% Republicans · $38.7M to 359 members
Outside spending, by party
Spent $13.9M to elect Democrats; $5.0M to defeat Democrats.
Emily'S List›$27K
EMILY's List's PAC, which backs Democratic women who support abortion rights.
Who it funds, across Congress
100% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $2.4M to 47 members
Jstreetpac›$27K
J Street's PAC, a liberal pro-Israel group that backs candidates supporting a two-state solution, often a counterweight to AIPAC.
Who it funds, across Congress
100% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $4.0M to 144 members
Fair Shot PAC›$23K
Who it funds, across Congress
100% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $914K to 102 members
New Democrat Coalition Action Fund›$20K
Who it funds, across Congress
100% Democrats · 0% Republicans · $563K to 74 members
› What is organized money?
An organization reaches a member two ways. Its own PAC writes a direct check. And it bundles: it gathers individual donations from its supporters and routes them through its conduit. Both count here as one “organized” total. The bundled part is already inside the individual giving shown in the funding mix above. Here it is regrouped by the organization that gathered it, so you can see who did the organizing.
The same money, by industry
Which industries have a stake.
The same organized money, grouped by the industry of the organization that moved it. It shows the interests behind Schrier's backing, not just the individual groups.
Plus $434K from organizations whose FEC name did not sort into an industry.
The money spent about Schrier
Spent for or against.
Outside groups also spend on their own to elect or defeat Schrier, running ads for or against the race. This money never passes through the campaign, so it is counted apart from the money organized for Schrier.
Working America$18K
To help Schrier$18KTo hurt Schrier—Momsrising Together$16K
To help Schrier$16KTo hurt Schrier—
Working America$18K—$18K
Momsrising Together$16K—$16K
FEC filings, 2023–2024 cycle · as of August 2026 · showing the top 5 funders of 257 organizations with a stake
About this data
FEC-disclosed receipts for the 2023–2024 cycle. This is the disclosed money only. Spending by outside groups that do not reveal their donors, the dark money that set a record in 2024, never appears in these figures.
Every percentage here is a share of all receipts, not of individual contributions only. So the small-donor share counts transfers, loans, and other money in its base, and can read higher than figures that divide only by individual money.
PAC figures are contributions to Schrier's campaign committee from FEC filings. Industry labels are grouped from each committee's name and are approximate. Joint fundraising committees and small-dollar conduits like ActBlue and WinRed are not counted.
Support for requiring the groups that spend on elections to name their donors, across both parties. Congress has not passed the DISCLOSE Act.
Where Schrier stands