U.S. Senator · AL
Tommy Tuberville
RepublicanSenate Class 2Term through January 2027
Funding profile · 2015–2020 term
16% of the money Tuberville raised came from small donors.
More grassroots-funded than 46% of the Senate.
Tuberville raised $9.6M across the full six-year Senate term (2015–2020), and ended the period with $173K cash on hand. Here is where the money came from.
- Small donors
- 16%$1.5M
- Large donors
- 62%$6.0M
- Bundled
- 2%$0.2M
- PACs
- 8%$0.8M
- Other
- 12%$1.1M
Against the senate
How Tuberville compares to the typical member.
- Small-donor share
- 16%vs 19% senate median
- PAC share
- 8%vs 14% senate median
Who has a stake in Tuberville
The organizations behind the money.
Tuberville's largest organized backing comes from Club For Growth. That counts the group's own PAC check plus the individual donations it bundled, not just the direct check.
› $777K in PAC money not itemized by group
Tuberville collected $777K of PAC money through a joint fundraising committee, which pools contributions and transfers them as a lump sum. It is counted in the organized total above, but FEC filings do not itemize which PACs it came from at the campaign level, so it is not attributed to a named organization here.
Money organized for Tuberville
Club For Growth›
$204K
Club For Growth›
$204K
Club for Growth's PAC and super PAC, backing anti-tax, small-government conservatives, often against Republican incumbents in primaries.
Who it funds, across Congress
0% Democrats · 100% Republicans · $2.7M to 39 members
Outside spending, by party
Spent $15.9M to elect Republicans; $27.5M to defeat Democrats.
Republican Jewish Coalition PAC›$12K
Who it funds, across Congress
0% Democrats · 100% Republicans · $935K to 72 members
Susan B. Anthony List. Inc. Candidate Fund›$1K
Who it funds, across Congress
0% Democrats · 100% Republicans · $401K to 60 members
Outside spending, by party
Spent $47K to elect Republicans.
› What is organized money?
An organization reaches a member two ways. Its own PAC writes a direct check. And it bundles: it gathers individual donations from its supporters and routes them through its conduit. Both count here as one “organized” total. The bundled part is already inside the individual giving shown in the funding mix above. Here it is regrouped by the organization that gathered it, so you can see who did the organizing.
The same money, by industry
Which industries have a stake.
The same organized money, grouped by the industry of the organization that moved it. It shows the interests behind Tuberville's backing, not just the individual groups.
Plus $1K from organizations whose FEC name did not sort into an industry.
The money spent about Tuberville
Spent for or against.
Outside groups also spend on their own to elect or defeat Tuberville, running ads for or against the race. This money never passes through the campaign, so it is counted apart from the money organized for Tuberville.
Club For Growth›$803K
To help Tuberville$803KTo hurt Tuberville—Club for Growth's PAC and super PAC, backing anti-tax, small-government conservatives, often against Republican incumbents in primaries.
Grit PAC$321K
To help Tuberville$321KTo hurt Tuberville—Swamp Drainers Foundation$106K
To help Tuberville$106KTo hurt Tuberville—Conservatives For Alabama$87K
To help Tuberville—To hurt Tuberville$87KHunter Action Fund$61K
To help Tuberville$61KTo hurt Tuberville—
Club For Growth›$803K—$803K
Club For Growth
Club for Growth's PAC and super PAC, backing anti-tax, small-government conservatives, often against Republican incumbents in primaries.
Grit PAC$321K—$321K
Swamp Drainers Foundation›$106K—$106K
Swamp Drainers Foundation
Conservatives For Alabama›—$87K$87K
Conservatives For Alabama
Hunter Action Fund$61K—$61K
FEC filings, 2015–2020 term · as of August 2026 · showing the top 3 funders of 15 organizations with a stake
About this data
FEC-disclosed receipts for the 2015–2020 term. This is the disclosed money only. Spending by outside groups that do not reveal their donors, the dark money that set a record in 2024, never appears in these figures.
Every percentage here is a share of all receipts, not of individual contributions only. So the small-donor share counts transfers, loans, and other money in its base, and can read higher than figures that divide only by individual money.
Support for requiring the groups that spend on elections to name their donors, across both parties. Congress has not passed the DISCLOSE Act.
Where Tuberville stands