Skip to content
Project Curia

Financing

U.S. Senator · NC

Thom Tillis

RepublicanSenate Class 2Term through January 2027

Funding profile · 2015–2020 term

20% of the money Tillis raised came from small donors.

More grassroots-funded than 54% of the Senate.

Tillis raised $26.7M across the full six-year Senate term (2015–2020), and ended the period with $835K cash on hand. Here is where the money came from.

20%from small donors
Small donors
20%$5.4M
Large donors
50%$13.5M
Bundled
0%$0.0M
PACs
19%$5.1M
Other
10%$2.7M

Against the senate

How Tillis compares to the typical member.

Small-donor share
20%vs 19% senate median
PAC share
19%vs 14% senate median

Who has a stake in Tillis

The organizations behind the money.

Tillis's largest organized backing comes from Susan B. Anthony List. Inc. Candidate Fund. That counts the group's own PAC check plus the individual donations it bundled, not just the direct check.

$5.1M in PAC money not itemized by group

Tillis collected $5.1M of PAC money through a joint fundraising committee, which pools contributions and transfers them as a lump sum. It is counted in the organized total above, but FEC filings do not itemize which PACs it came from at the campaign level, so it is not attributed to a named organization here.

Money organized for Tillis

Susan B. Anthony List. Inc. Candidate Fund

$13K

Who it funds, across Congress

0% Democrats · 100% Republicans · $401K to 60 members

Outside spending, by party

Spent $47K to elect Republicans.

Aristotle International Inc. PAC$7K

Who it funds, across Congress

69% Democrats · 31% Republicans · $25K to 7 members

Republican Jewish Coalition PAC$5K

Who it funds, across Congress

0% Democrats · 100% Republicans · $935K to 72 members

Pro-Israel America PAC$4K

Who it funds, across Congress

26% Democrats · 74% Republicans · $693K to 19 members

What is organized money?

An organization reaches a member two ways. Its own PAC writes a direct check. And it bundles: it gathers individual donations from its supporters and routes them through its conduit. Both count here as one “organized” total. The bundled part is already inside the individual giving shown in the funding mix above. Here it is regrouped by the organization that gathered it, so you can see who did the organizing. Tillisreceived so many small earmarked donations that these figures count only the largest ones. Read every total as “at least.”

The same money, by industry

Which industries have a stake.

The same organized money, grouped by the industry of the organization that moved it. It shows the interests behind Tillis's backing, not just the individual groups.

$5KEnergy
$4KPro-Israel

Plus $19K from organizations whose FEC name did not sort into an industry.

The money spent about Tillis

Spent for or against.

Outside groups also spend on their own to elect or defeat Tillis, running ads for or against the race. This money never passes through the campaign, so it is counted apart from the money organized for Tillis.

All outside groups12% to help, 88% to hurt$94.9M
  1. Senate Majority PAC$34.3M
    To help Tillis
    To hurt Tillis
    $34.3M

    The super PAC aligned with Senate Democratic leadership.

  2. DSCC$24.2M
    To help Tillis
    To hurt Tillis
    $24.2M

    The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, the party committee for electing Senate Democrats.

  3. Americans For Prosperity Action$9.7M
    To help Tillis
    $9.6M
    To hurt Tillis
    $182K

    Americans for Prosperity Action, the super PAC of the Koch network, spending independently for mostly conservative candidates.

  4. Everytown For Gun Safety Victory Fund$3.9M
    To help Tillis
    To hurt Tillis
    $3.9M
  5. Patients For Affordable Drugs Action$3.7M
    To help Tillis
    To hurt Tillis
    $3.7M

FEC filings, 2015–2020 term · as of August 2026 · showing the top 4 funders of 62 organizations with a stake

About this data

FEC-disclosed receipts for the 2015–2020 term. This is the disclosed money only. Spending by outside groups that do not reveal their donors, the dark money that set a record in 2024, never appears in these figures.

Every percentage here is a share of all receipts, not of individual contributions only. So the small-donor share counts transfers, loans, and other money in its base, and can read higher than figures that divide only by individual money.

84%want dark money disclosed

Support for requiring the groups that spend on elections to name their donors, across both parties. Congress has not passed the DISCLOSE Act.

Where Tillis stands