U.S. Senator · OK
James Lankford
RepublicanSenate Class 3Term through January 2029
Funding profile · 2017–2022 term
4% of the money Lankford raised came from small donors.
More grassroots-funded than 9% of the Senate.
Lankford raised $7.3M across the full six-year Senate term (2017–2022), and ended the period with $2.1M cash on hand. Here is where the money came from.
- Small donors
- 4%$0.3M
- Large donors
- 44%$3.3M
- Bundled
- 5%$0.4M
- PACs
- 35%$2.6M
- Other
- 12%$0.9M
Against the senate
How Lankford compares to the typical member.
- Small-donor share
- 4%vs 19% senate median
- PAC share
- 35%vs 14% senate median
Who has a stake in Lankford
The organizations behind the money.
Lankford's largest organized backing comes from Pro-Israel America PAC. That counts the group's own PAC check plus the individual donations it bundled, not just the direct check.
Money organized for Lankford
Pro-Israel America PAC›
$167K
Pro-Israel America PAC›
$167K
Who it funds, across Congress
26% Democrats · 74% Republicans · $693K to 19 members
Votesane PAC›$125K
Who it funds, across Congress
40% Democrats · 60% Republicans · $2.6M to 42 members
NORPAC›$40K
A pro-Israel political action committee that bundles individual donations to candidates it judges supportive of the U.S. relationship with Israel.
Who it funds, across Congress
40% Democrats · 59% Republicans · $2.2M to 82 members
American Pro-Israel PAC›$27K
Who it funds, across Congress
0% Democrats · 100% Republicans · $27K to 1 members
Susan B Anthony List Inc. Candidate Fund›$13K
Who it funds, across Congress
0% Democrats · 100% Republicans · $401K to 60 members
Outside spending, by party
Spent $47K to elect Republicans.
› What is organized money?
An organization reaches a member two ways. Its own PAC writes a direct check. And it bundles: it gathers individual donations from its supporters and routes them through its conduit. Both count here as one “organized” total. The bundled part is already inside the individual giving shown in the funding mix above. Here it is regrouped by the organization that gathered it, so you can see who did the organizing.
The same money, by industry
Which industries have a stake.
The same organized money, grouped by the industry of the organization that moved it. It shows the interests behind Lankford's backing, not just the individual groups.
Plus $872K from organizations whose FEC name did not sort into an industry.
The money spent about Lankford
Spent for or against.
Outside groups also spend on their own to elect or defeat Lankford, running ads for or against the race. This money never passes through the campaign, so it is counted apart from the money organized for Lankford.
Defend Oklahoma Values$123K
To help Lankford$123KTo hurt Lankford—American Energy Action Fund$52K
To help Lankford$52KTo hurt Lankford—Drain The Dc Swamp PAC$12K
To help Lankford—To hurt Lankford$12K
Defend Oklahoma Values$123K—$123K
American Energy Action Fund›$52K—$52K
American Energy Action Fund
Drain The Dc Swamp PAC—$12K$12K
FEC filings, 2017–2022 term · as of August 2026 · showing the top 5 funders of 429 organizations with a stake
About this data
FEC-disclosed receipts for the 2017–2022 term. This is the disclosed money only. Spending by outside groups that do not reveal their donors, the dark money that set a record in 2024, never appears in these figures.
Every percentage here is a share of all receipts, not of individual contributions only. So the small-donor share counts transfers, loans, and other money in its base, and can read higher than figures that divide only by individual money.
PAC figures are contributions to Lankford's campaign committee from FEC filings. Industry labels are grouped from each committee's name and are approximate. Joint fundraising committees and small-dollar conduits like ActBlue and WinRed are not counted.
Support for requiring the groups that spend on elections to name their donors, across both parties. Congress has not passed the DISCLOSE Act.
Where Lankford stands