U.S. Senator · Oklahoma
James Lankford
Backs 0 of the 6 measures their own party’s voters want.
How the grade works, and where everyone stands →DBacks 0 of the 6 measures their own party’s voters want.
How the grade works, and where everyone stands →Curia grade
- Party
- Republican
- First took office
- 2011
- Age
- 58
- Term ends
- Jan 2029
- Issues
- 0/6
- Bills
- 56
- Trades
- 0
- FinancingSenate median 19%
- 4%
- Reforms
- No documented cosponsorship of a tracked reform
- Issues: Polled measures where they side with their own party's voters.
- Bills: Floor votes we have decoded and recorded for them, including rolls they did not vote on.
- Trades: Transactions they disclosed under the STOCK Act: stocks, funds, bonds, options and more.
- Financing: Share of their campaign money from small donors giving $200 or less.
- Reforms: Reforms with a current vehicle and a documented current or prior cosponsorship. No documented cosponsorship is not opposition.
A hollow circle means no record, never a zero.
On the issues
Where Lankford stands on the issues.
How Lankford has acted on the key bills behind the issues Americans care about most. A floor vote where one exists, and cosponsorship otherwise. Open an issue to see the bills and how both parties split.
Health Care AffordabilityBacked 2 of 10
- Voted no
Extend ACA Subsidies Three Years
Extends the enhanced Affordable Care Act premium tax credits through 2028. Monthly premiums stay lower for people who buy their own coverage on the marketplace.
The record · roll no. 644Voted yes on this roll
Democrats100%Republicans8% - Voted yes
Fund HSAs Instead of Subsidies
The Senate Republicans' alternative. Instead of subsidizing insurers, the government puts cash into people's Health Savings Accounts, plus cost-sharing help, for those on bronze, catastrophic, and silver plans.
The record · roll no. 643Voted yes on this roll
Democrats0%Republicans98% - Not on record
Make ACA Subsidies Permanent
Makes the enhanced ACA premium tax credits permanent. More people qualify for marketplace subsidies, and the subsidies stay larger, for good.
Backed it, share of today’s members
Democrats98%Republicans0% - Cosponsored
Rein In Drug Middlemen
Reins in the pharmacy benefit managers who sit between drugmakers and pharmacies. It curbs tactics like “spread pricing,” requires PBMs to pass manufacturer rebates through to health plans, and unlinks their pay from a drug's list price.
Backed it, share of today’s members
Democrats27%Republicans30%
2 more measures exist only in the House, so they aren’t shown here.
The Federal DeficitBacked 1 of 6
- Voted yes
Rescind Enacted Spending
Cancels money Congress has already approved. The 2025 version clawed back about $9 billion, mostly from foreign aid and public broadcasting, and was signed into law.
The record · roll no. 411Voted yes on this roll
Democrats0%Republicans96% - Not on record
Restore Impoundment Power
Repeals the 1974 law that bars a president from refusing to spend money Congress has appropriated. It would let the president “impound” funds, that is, decline to spend them, to hold down federal outlays.
Backed it, share of today’s members
Democrats0%Republicans4% - Not on record
Bipartisan Fiscal Commission
Creates a bipartisan commission of lawmakers and outside experts to write a plan to stabilize the debt, with a guaranteed up-or-down vote in Congress. It doesn't choose the spending cuts or tax increases itself; it forces a process to decide.
Backed it, share of today’s members
Democrats9%Republicans9% - Not on record
Surtax on Top Incomes
Adds an extra tax on income above roughly $1 million a year, on top of the existing rates.
Backed it, share of today’s members
Democrats9%Republicans0%
2 more measures exist only in the House, so they aren’t shown here.
Drug AddictionBacked 1 of 5
- Voted yes
Permanently Schedule Fentanyl-Related Drugs
Permanently places all fentanyl-related substances into Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act, the most tightly controlled category, so making or selling any chemical cousin of fentanyl carries the same penalties as fentanyl itself. Before this, the class was scheduled only under temporary orders that had to be renewed.
The record · roll no. 127Voted yes on this roll
Democrats67%Republicans100% - Not on record
Lower the Bar for Mandatory Minimums
Lowers the quantity of fentanyl that triggers a mandatory-minimum prison sentence, so far smaller amounts carry the same automatic penalties that today apply only to large quantities. Despite its name, it makes trafficking sentences harsher, not lighter.
Backed it, share of today’s members
Democrats0%Republicans9% - Not on record
Prescribe Addiction Medications by Telehealth
Permanently lets clinicians prescribe medications for opioid use disorder, such as buprenorphine, over telehealth, without requiring an in-person visit first. It makes permanent a flexibility that began during the pandemic.
Backed it, share of today’s members
Democrats42%Republicans8% - Not on record
Let Pharmacies Dispense Methadone
Lets addiction specialists prescribe methadone for opioid use disorder and lets ordinary pharmacies fill it, breaking the current rule that methadone for addiction can be dispensed only at federally licensed opioid-treatment clinics.
Backed it, share of today’s members
Democrats16%Republicans2% - Not on record
Fund State Overdose Treatment Hubs
Creates a five-year Medicaid pilot, in up to ten states, that pays for “health engagement hubs”: one-stop sites offering rapid-access addiction treatment, physical and mental health care, peer support, and case management, with the federal government covering at least 90 percent of the cost.
Backed it, share of today’s members
Democrats2%Republicans2%
2 more measures exist only in the House, so they aren’t shown here.
Gun PolicyBacked 3 of 9
- Not on record
Universal Background Checks
Requires a background check for nearly all firearm sales, including private transfers between individuals. Today only licensed dealers must run the check; sales between private parties are generally exempt.
Backed it, share of today’s members
Democrats100%Republicans0% - Not on record
Safe Firearm Storage
Sets a federal safe-storage standard: firearms in a home where a minor could reach them must be locked or otherwise secured, with penalties when an unsecured gun is accessed. It is named for a teenager killed by an unsecured firearm.
Backed it, share of today’s members
Democrats87%Republicans0% - Not on record
Raise the Purchase Age to 21
Raises the minimum age to buy certain semiautomatic rifles and shotguns from a licensed dealer from 18 to 21. Handgun sales from dealers already carry a 21-and-older minimum.
Backed it, share of today’s members
Democrats40%Republicans0% - Not on record
Assault Weapons Ban
Bans the manufacture, sale, and import of many semiautomatic rifles and pistols the bill defines as “assault weapons,” along with the large-capacity magazines it defines. Firearms already owned are grandfathered in.
Backed it, share of today’s members
Democrats93%Republicans0%
2 more measures exist only in the House, so they aren’t shown here.
Climate ChangeBacked 2 of 5
- Not on record
Charge Polluting Imports a Carbon Price
Sets a fee on imported steel, cement, and other heavy industrial goods based on how much carbon pollution it took to make them, and holds American producers to the same standard.
Backed it, share of today’s members
Democrats13%Republicans0% - Not on record
Clear Out Wildfire Fuel Faster
Speeds up environmental reviews for forest-thinning and controlled-burn projects on federal land, and sets up a joint federal center to coordinate wildfire work. The House passed it in 2025.
Backed it, share of today’s members
Democrats4%Republicans4% - Not on record
Fast-Track Nuclear Fuel Plants
Puts the Nuclear Regulatory Commission on a deadline when it licenses the plants that make and recycle fuel for advanced reactors, the step that currently holds up new reactors.
Backed it, share of today’s members
Democrats2%Republicans2% - Voted yes
Undo California's EV Sales Mandate
Cancels the federal permission that let California require carmakers to sell a rising share of zero-emission vehicles, a standard more than a dozen other states had adopted. It passed both chambers and was signed into law in 2025.
The record · roll no. 277Voted yes on this roll
Democrats2%Republicans100% - Cosponsored; voted yes
Scrap the Methane Emissions Fee
Kills the federal charge that made oil and gas companies pay for the methane they leak or vent into the air, a fee created by the 2022 climate law. It passed both chambers and was signed into law in 2025.
The record · roll no. 97Voted yes on this roll
Democrats0%Republicans100%
5 more measures exist only in the House, so they aren’t shown here.
ImmigrationBacked 2 of 7
- Cosponsored; voted yes
Detain and Deport for Theft Crimes
Requires the federal government to detain immigrants without legal status who are arrested for or charged with theft-related crimes, assaulting a police officer, or a crime causing death or serious injury. It also lets states sue the federal government over immigration-enforcement decisions.
The record · roll no. 7Voted yes on this roll
Democrats27%Republicans100% - Voted yes
Fund Border and Interior Enforcement
Provides about $70 billion through 2029 to the Department of Homeland Security, Customs and Border Protection, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement for border security and immigration enforcement.
The record · roll no. 163Voted yes on this roll
Democrats0%Republicans98% - Not on record
Cut Funds to Sanctuary Jurisdictions
Makes a state or locality ineligible for certain federal funds if it limits cooperation with federal immigration enforcement, such as by declining to hold people for federal agents or withholding immigration-status information.
Backed it, share of today’s members
Democrats0%Republicans21% - Not on record
End Birthright Citizenship by Statute
Redefines who is a citizen at birth so that a child born in the United States is a citizen only if at least one parent is a citizen, a lawful permanent resident, or a noncitizen serving in the armed forces.
Backed it, share of today’s members
Democrats0%Republicans21%
6 more measures exist only in the House, so they aren’t shown here.
Tracked votes
How Lankford voted lately.
The most recent bills Congress voted on, and how Lankford voted on each. We read every one and wrote down what it does. Open any bill for the plain-language decode, or see the full record below.
- S 4668Protect College Sports Act of 2026Sep 28, 2026 · Passed Chamber · congress.gov ↗Yea
Senate vote · 77-22
Democrats26-19Republicans50-2Independents1-1 - HR 6500Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2027Aug 8, 2026 · Economics and Public Finance · Became Law · Bundled · congress.gov ↗Not voting
Senate vote · 90-6
Democrats42-3Republicans47-2Independents1-1 - HR 5334Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026Aug 7, 2026 · International Affairs · Became Law · Bundled · congress.gov ↗Yea
Senate vote · 86-11
Democrats36-9Republicans49-1Independents1-1 - HCONRES 86Iran War Powers Withdrawal ResolutionJun 23, 2026 · International Affairs · Passed Both · congress.gov ↗Nay
Senate vote · 50-48
Democrats44-1Republicans4-47Independents2-0 - HR 664421st Century ROAD to Housing ActJun 22, 2026 · Housing and Community Development · Became Law · Bundled · congress.gov ↗Yea
Senate vote · 85-5
Democrats41-0Republicans42-5Independents2-0 - S 2Secure America ActJun 5, 2026 · Immigration · Became Law · congress.gov ↗Yea
Senate vote · 52-47
Democrats0-44Republicans52-1Independents0-2
A “not voting” mark means Lankford was not recorded on that roll call. Members miss votes for many reasons, from travel to illness to leadership duties.
Lankford has disclosed no stock trades.
Most members of Congress do not trade individual stocks. Those who do disclose each trade under the STOCK Act, and we track it. Lankford has none on record.
Who funds Lankford
The money behind Lankford.
Lankford raised $7.3 million across the 2017-2022 term. Whether it came from small donors, large donors, or PACs is the clearest read on who a member answers to.
4% of the money Lankford raised came from small donors.
- Small donors
- 4%$0.3M
- Large donors
- 44%$3.3M
- Bundled
- 5%$0.4M
- PACs
- 35%$2.6M
- Other
- 12%$0.9M
Reform stances
Where Lankford stands on reform.
Cosponsored0/ 6of the six reforms with a current bill. A matching prior-Congress cosponsorship also counts. No documented cosponsorship is not opposition.
- Not on record
Overturn Citizens United
At least 75% of voters in each party favor the question asked. This member has not cosponsored a bill for it.
Democrats84%Republicans75%Independents81%Voters: Verasight for the Brennan Center for Justice (an advocacy organization), Apr-May 2026
Voters asked: A constitutional amendment establishing that the federal and state governments may regulate and limit contributions to campaigns and campaign spending, including by placing greater limits on corporations than on individuals
- Not on record
Disclose Dark Money
At least 85% of voters in each party favor the question asked. This member has not cosponsored a bill for it.
Democrats88%Republicans85%Independents84%Voters: Verasight for the Brennan Center for Justice (an advocacy organization), Apr-May 2026
Voters asked: A law that requires all organizations that spend money on federal campaigns to disclose their major donors and requires online political ads to say who paid for them
- Not on record
Open Primaries
At least 65% of voters in each party favor the question asked. This member has not cosponsored a bill for it.
Democrats79%Republicans65%Independents70%Voters: Emerson College / RealClear, commissioned by Unite America (an advocacy organization), Jan 2026
Voters asked: States should be required to hold open primaries where all voters can participate regardless of party registration.
- Not on record
End Gerrymandering
At least 57% of voters in each party favor the question asked. This member has not cosponsored a bill for it.
Democrats76%Republicans57%Independents72%Voters: Noble Predictive Insights for Common Cause (an advocacy organization), Sept 2025
Voters asked: Do you think it is good or bad for the country when one political party controls how voting districts are drawn?
- Not on record
Ban Stock Trading
At least 87% of voters in each party favor the question asked. This member has not cosponsored a bill for it.
Democrats88%Republicans87%Independents81%Voters: U. of Maryland PPC, May 2023
Voters asked: Prohibit Members of Congress (in the House and Senate) and the family that lives with them, from trading stocks in individual companies. They would still be allowed to buy or sell shares of mutual funds or index funds that include stocks in numerous companies. In conclusion, do you favor or oppose this proposal?
- Not on record
Extend Cool-Off Period
At least 65% of voters in each party favor the question asked. This member has not cosponsored a bill for it.
Democrats67%Republicans65%Independents-Voters: U. of Maryland PPC, June 2022
Voters asked: Extend the period former Members of Congress must wait before lobbying Congress to five years.
- Not on record
Stop Foreign Lobbying
At least 71% of voters in each party favor the question asked. No bill carries it in this Congress, so this row is not scored.
Democrats74%Republicans71%Independents-Voters: U. of Maryland PPC, June 2022
Voters asked: Ban former senior Executive Branch officials from lobbying on behalf of a foreign government for the rest of their life.
How this is scored
Each marked row names what the member did: sponsored or cosponsored a bill carrying the reform, signed a discharge petition to force one to the floor, or cosponsored a prior version in a previous Congress while still serving today. Not on record means there is no documented signal. The member may still support or oppose; we have no evidence either way. Floor votes are not yet wired in, so nobody is marked Opposes.
Several reforms have bills carried almost entirely by one party. That makes the headline percentage a measure of cosponsorship on these specific bills, not a measure of underlying agreement with the reform. A 0% figure for one party often means “has not cosponsored this vehicle,” not “opposes the reform.”
Sponsored and cosponsored
What Lankford puts a name on.
420 measures on Lankford’s record in the 119th Congress: 78 sponsored, 342 cosponsored.
No area holds more than 13% of Lankford’s record; the largest is Government Operations and Politics.
Cosponsoring puts a member’s name on a text. It is a public position, not a vote, and not a promise of one.
Most cosponsorships are signed when the measure is introduced; a row says so only when the name was added later, or withdrawn.
A policy area that does not appear here is one Lankford has not put a name on in this Congress. That is silence, not opposition, and it is left blank rather than counted.
The Library of Congress files each measure under one policy area; the shares cover the 415 of 420 measures on this record that carry one. It adds finer legislative subjects to only part of the corpus: the subjects cover 187 of 420, and show the 10 most common of 358.
Source: govinfo BILLSTATUS bulk data for the 119th Congress, rows from January 6, 2025 to September 24, 2026. Archives downloaded September 28, 2026. Newest source record by type: HCONRES 2026-09-26; HJRES 2026-09-25; HR 2026-09-26; HRES 2026-09-26; S 2026-09-27; SCONRES 2026-09-26; SJRES 2026-09-26; SRES 2026-09-26.
The 10 most common of 358 subjects, on the 187 of 420 measures the Library labels in detail.
- Congressional oversight44
- Commemorative events and holidays38
- Congressional tributes34
- Government information and archives31
- Administrative law and regulatory procedures21
- Civil actions and liability21
- Religion15
- Computers and information technology14
- Elementary and secondary education13
- Higher education13
Where Lankford sits
Among the Senate.
Lankford votes further right than 80% of the Senate. Each mark is one of the 100 senators sitting today, placed by how often they vote with each other rather than by anything we think of them.
DW-NOMINATE, the standard academic measure, computed by Voteview at UCLA over the 119th Congress and read here as of August 2026. It is built only from recorded votes: 879 of them for Lankford. It says who votes together, not who is right.
Contact
Reach Lankford's office.
- Office phone
- 202-224-5754
- Email Lankford →
- Washington office
- 731 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
A staffed line and the official contact form; members do not publish direct numbers.
Share this record
Lankford's record as a card, generated from today's data with its sources printed on it.
Measures a majority of Republican voters want and Lankford has not backed; pick one.

