Senator, Maryland
Angela D. Alsobrooks
Democrat. In Congress since 2025. Age 55. Term ends January 2031.
Not on the 2026 ballot. The seat is next up in 2030.
Raised: campaign receipts in the 2023-2024 campaign, from FEC filings. Stock trades: every trade disclosed on a periodic report, ranked against the Senate. Floor votes: the roll calls Curia has recorded for Alsobrooks on the bills it reads in plain language, including rolls they missed. Bills written: measures Alsobrooks sponsored in the 119th Congress. The median is the middle sitting member of the Senate. The Senate has no median for money raised: each senator's campaign covers a different window.
Campaign money
Receipts in the 2023-2024 campaign
- Small donors
- 26%$8.2M
- Large donors
- 49%$15.3M
- Bundled
- <1%$0.3M
- PACs
- 4%$1.2M
- Other
- 20%$6.1M
- The median senatorShare raised from small donors
- 19%
- PAC and bundled moneyThe bundled count is a floor
- At least $1.5M
Stock trades
No stock trades disclosed
On Senate periodic transaction reports since January 2025
Periodic transaction reports, which the STOCK Act asks for within 45 days of most trades in individual stocks and bonds. Trades in qualifying funds are reported only once a year, on the annual disclosure, and are not counted here. Some reports filed on paper are not read here yet, so the Senate’s own index is the complete record.
- Assets disclosedOn the 2025 annual filing
- $101K to $266K
Votes
Floor votes on the bills Curia reads, newest first
Bills written
As sponsor in the 119th Congress, latest step first
Issues
With Democratic voters on 4 of 8 polled measures
Cosponsored or voted for
- 3 of 10
- 1 of 6
- 0 of 5
- 4 of 9
- 0 of 5
- 0 of 7
The polled measures are the key bills behind the issues Americans care about most, where a poll shows what each party’s voters want. A row counts Alsobrooks’s floor vote where one exists and cosponsorship otherwise, on the measures the Senate can act on. No recorded action is not opposition. Each issue opens in the Issues lens with every bill and how both parties split.
Alsobrooks among the Senate
Alsobrooks votes further left than 89% of the Senate.
Source: DW-NOMINATE, Voteview at UCLA, 119th Congress
Each mark is one of the 100 senators sitting today, placed by how often they vote with each other rather than by anything we think of them. DW-NOMINATE, the standard academic measure, computed by Voteview at UCLA over the 119th Congress and read here as of August 2026. It is built only from recorded votes: 871 of them for Alsobrooks. It says who votes together, not who is right.
Committees
In the 119th Congress
- Special Committee on Aging
- Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs
- Environment and Public Works
- Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Voting in Maryland
General election
November 3, 2026
Register 21 days before, or same-day during early voting and on Election Day in person.
Reach Alsobrooks’s office
- Office phone202-224-4524
- Email the officeEmail Alsobrooks
- Washington office374 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
A staffed line and the official contact form; members do not publish direct numbers.
Cosponsored or voted for 4 of the 8 measures their own party’s voters want.
How the grade works, and where everyone stands →BCosponsored or voted for 4 of the 8 measures their own party’s voters want.
How the grade works, and where everyone stands →Curia grade
1 of 6
Reforms Alsobrooks cosponsored, of the 6 with a current bill
Bioguide ID A000382. Member data: unitedstates/congress-legislators. Headshot: unitedstates/images.
Campaign money
Raised, 2023-2024 campaign
$31.1M
- Cash on handAt the end of the 2023-2024 campaign
- $50K
26% of the money Alsobrooks raised came from small donors.
- Small donors
- 26%
- $8.2M
- Large donors
- 49%
- $15.3M
- Bundled
- <1%
- $0.3M
- PACs
- 4%
- $1.2M
- Other
- 20%
- $6.1M
Everything that is not small-donor, large-donor, or PAC money. Mostly money transferred in from committees the candidate authorized, such as joint fundraising committees, which report their own donors to the FEC.
Total Other
$6.1M20% of receipts
- Transfers from joint fundraising and other authorized committees
- 19%$5.9M
- Self-funding
- 0%$0
- Party committee money
- 0%$0.1M
- Refunds, offsets, miscellaneous
- 1%$0.2M
FEC-disclosed receipts for the 2023-2024 campaign. “Small” means contributions from donors who gave $200 or less in total, which the FEC does not require to be itemized.
This is the disclosed money only. Spending by outside groups that do not reveal their donors, the dark money that set a record in 2024, never appears in these figures.
Every percentage here is a share of all receipts, not of individual contributions only. So the small-donor share counts transfers, loans and other money in its base, and reads lower than figures that divide only by individual money.
FEC filings read October 31, 2026.
Against the Senate median
- Small-donor share
- 26%vs 19% Senate median
- PAC share
- 4%vs 13% Senate median
PACs and bundled gifts
2023-2024 campaign, largest first.
- From other members’ leadership PACs
From the PACs of 52 other members
$356K
An organization reaches a member two ways. Its own PAC writes a direct check. And it bundles: it gathers individual donations from its supporters and routes them through its conduit. Both count here as one “organized” total. The bundled part is already inside the individual giving shown in the funding mix above. Here it is regrouped by the organization that gathered it, so you can see who did the organizing. Alsobrooks received so many small earmarked donations that these figures count only the largest ones. Read every total as “at least.”
Money an organization gave through its PAC or bundled from its people to Alsobrooks’s campaign, the 2023-2024 campaign, largest first. Showing the top 15 of 218 organizations with a stake. Leadership PACs are the personal PACs colleagues use to build support. Source: FEC filings, as of October 2026.
Industries
Organized money, by the industry of the group that gave it
$1.4Morganized, every industry below
- Leadership & Ideological44%$609K
- Labor17%$241K
- Pro-Israel10%$131K
- Health & Pharma3%$39K
- Law & Lobbying1%$19K
Each organization is grouped by industry from its FEC name, which is approximate. This is the same organized money as the list above, regrouped by industry.
PAC figures are contributions to Alsobrooks’s campaign committee from FEC filings. Industry labels are grouped from each committee’s name and are approximate. Joint fundraising committees and small-dollar conduits like ActBlue and WinRed are not counted.
Outside spending
- Maryland's Future$26.7M$26.7M
- Black Progressive Action Coalition$991K$991K
- National Nurses United for Patient Protection$942K$942K
- BlackPAC$804K$804K
- Save America$147K$147K
All outside groups: to elect $3.5M, to defeat $26.7M, total $30.1M11% to help, 89% to hurt
Outside groups also spend on their own to elect or defeat Alsobrooks, running ads for or against the race. This money never passes through the campaign, so it is counted apart from the money organized for Alsobrooks. Whether a dollar supported or opposed Alsobrooks is the group’s own filing, never our reading.
The colour names the side the money helps: spending to elect Alsobrooks helps Alsobrooks’s party, and spending to defeat Alsobrooks helps the other side. The totals cover every group that spent; the list shows the largest.
Trips paid by others
Since 2026, none by Alsobrooks
- Aug 27, 2026, staffFairbanks, Alaska | Denali National Park, Alaska | Fairbanks, Alaska
Paid by American Lands Project
- Apr 17, 2026, staffPhiladelphia, PA
Paid by The Pew Charitable Trusts
- Feb 14, 2026, staffMilan, Italy
Paid by ModSquad
- Jan 22, 2026, staffNew York, New York
Paid by ModSquad
- Jan 20, 2026, staffNew York, New York
Paid by Innovative Future Collective
Travel a private sponsor paid for, filed by Alsobrooks’s office with the House or Senate ethics office, by Alsobrooks or by staff. Newest first.
Dark money disclosure
84%
Support for the question asked
Congress has not passed the DISCLOSE Act.
Voters asked: A law that requires all organizations that spend money on federal campaigns to disclose their major donors and requires online political ads to say who paid for them
Cite this page
The citation names the source data used for this record.
Share this record
Where Alsobrooks's campaign money comes from: small donors, large donors, and PACs.
Every card is generated from today's data and carries its source. Take it and post it. You do not need to credit Project Curia. The card already does.
Bioguide ID A000382. Member data: unitedstates/congress-legislators. Headshot: unitedstates/images.
Stock trades
No stock trades disclosed
On Senate periodic transaction reports since January 2025
Periodic transaction reports, which the STOCK Act asks for within 45 days of most trades in individual stocks and bonds. Trades in qualifying funds are reported only once a year, on the annual disclosure, and are not counted here. Some reports filed on paper are not read here yet, so the Senate’s own index is the complete record.
Cite this page
The citation names the source data used for this record.
Share this record
Alsobrooks does not trade individual stocks. The card says so plainly.
Every card is generated from today's data and carries its source. Take it and post it. You do not need to credit Project Curia. The card already does.
Bioguide ID A000382. Member data: unitedstates/congress-legislators. Headshot: unitedstates/images.
Income beyond salary
Each figure is at least what the forms allow.
Average a year
$2,501
1 of 1 years counted
Latest year, 2025
$2,501
Median member, a year
$43,061
of 485 members
By year
The least each year’s forms allow, 2025 to 2025
Each column is one counted year, drawn at its floor: the smallest amount the form allows, so the true figure is this much or more. The mint column is the latest counted year. A dashed outline is a year in office that is not counted, never a zero.
Net worth
Disclosed assets and liabilities, each as the range Alsobrooks’s 2025 annual filing allows, never netted.
Disclosed assets
$101K to $266K
as ranges on 3 line items
Disclosed liabilities
$350K to $750K
as ranges on 2 line items
The average adds each counted year’s smallest possible amount beyond salary and divides by the years counted. A year not counted is left out, never counted as zero. Outside pay is exact; investment income is reported in ranges and counts at least its lowest end. The typical member is the median of the 485 members’ own yearly averages. Joint, spouse and dependent holdings stay combined as filed. $210,580 reported for work before taking office is left out everywhere here. Tax-deferred accounts alone give no income amount.
The annual rate set by law for the latest year in office: $174,000. A first year is paid by days, so it is smaller. Salary is separate from every figure beyond it.
Each link opens the filing on the official site, a year at a time.
These are the lower and upper bounds of the ranges on the filing, not a market valuation. Assets and liabilities are shown separately and are never netted into a net worth. How these bands are read
Annual financial disclosure reports filed with the Clerk of the House and the Secretary of the Senate; salary from the Congressional Research Service (97-1011).
Share this record
Where Alsobrooks's campaign money comes from: small donors, large donors, and PACs.
Every card is generated from today's data and carries its source. Take it and post it. You do not need to credit Project Curia. The card already does.
Bioguide ID A000382. Member data: unitedstates/congress-legislators. Headshot: unitedstates/images.
The votes Alsobrooks cast on the bills this site reads and writes up, not every roll call the chamber took. A position is the member’s own recorded vote on that bill’s passage. Broke with party marks a vote cast against the majority of Alsobrooks’s own party; it is never set for a vote of present, a missed vote, an independent, or a party evenly split. Each party’s bar fills with the share of its members who voted yea, beside its yea and nay count. A not voting mark means Alsobrooks was not recorded on that roll call. Members miss votes for many reasons, from travel to illness to leadership duties.
House Clerk and Senate roll call records, joined to the bills this site decodes. Every row opens to a plain summary of the bill, a link to where every member stood, and the bill on Congress.gov.
Share this record
Where Alsobrooks broke with their party on a tracked vote. Pick a vote from the five most recent.
Every card is generated from today's data and carries its source. Take it and post it. You do not need to credit Project Curia. The card already does.
Bioguide ID A000382. Member data: unitedstates/congress-legislators. Headshot: unitedstates/images.
Measures Alsobrooks sponsored
Introduced in the 119th Congress, March 2025 to August 2026, latest stage date first.
Referred unless marked · Senate Committee on Finance unless marked
- S. 5080
Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs
Jul 22, 2026
The sponsor is the member who introduced the measure, a different act from cosponsoring somebody else’s. A resolution that its chamber, or both chambers, agreed to has finished its process and is filed under Adopted.
Where the stage and place are the same for the rows shown, a row gives the number of members listed as cosponsors of the measure in the same bulk data instead.
The stage on each measure is the furthest point the record states it reached, and the date is when it reached it. A measure that stops at a stage has not necessarily ended: text is regularly folded into another vehicle that moves on under a different number, and the record against this number simply stops being written. Nothing here counts, names or ranks what did not happen.
Committee stages come from dated committee activities. Passage, presentation and veto stages come from the measure’s own actions; law records identify enactment. The date beside the bill number belongs to the stage shown below.
Source: govinfo BILLSTATUS bulk data for the 119th Congress, as of 2026-10-31, with the sponsor of record from the same bulk data and committee names from the House and Senate committee rosters. Download this list as JSON, the sponsorship and stage record, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.
Lobbying on Alsobrooks’s bills
22 of 38 bills named
Lobbying reports (LD-2) whose issue text names one of Alsobrooks’s bills by number, counted as a floor: a report may describe a bill without its number. Most named first. Source: the Senate lobbying disclosure database.
Sponsored and cosponsored
477 measures in the 119th Congress: 38 sponsored, 439 cosponsored.
Cosponsoring puts a member’s name on a text. It is a public position, not a vote, and not a promise of one.
Most cosponsorships are signed when the measure is introduced; a row says so only when the name was added later, or withdrawn.
A policy area that does not appear here is one Alsobrooks has not put a name on in this Congress. That is silence, not opposition, and it is left blank rather than counted.
The Library of Congress files each measure under one policy area; the shares cover the 477 of 477 measures on this record that carry one. It adds finer legislative subjects to only part of the corpus: the subjects cover 128 of 477, and show the 10 most common of 352.
Source: govinfo BILLSTATUS bulk data for the 119th Congress, rows from January 9, 2025 to September 30, 2026. Archives downloaded October 31, 2026. Newest source record by type: HCONRES 2026-10-30; HJRES 2026-10-31; HR 2026-10-31; HRES 2026-10-31; S 2026-10-31; SCONRES 2026-10-29; SJRES 2026-10-29; SRES 2026-10-31.
The 10 most common of 352 subjects, on the 128 of 477 measures the Library labels in detail.
- Congressional oversight35
- Congressional tributes25
- Commemorative events and holidays20
- Government studies and investigations12
- Members of Congress12
- Administrative law and regulatory procedures11
- Civil actions and liability11
- Government information and archives11
- Senate11
- State and local government operations11
Share this record
One reform at a time
Where Alsobrooks stands on the six reforms with a current bill. Prior matching cosponsorships are included.
Each card pairs a single reform with what Alsobrooks's own party's voters say about it. A filled dot means Alsobrooks cosponsored a bill. An open dot means no public position, which is not a vote against.
Every card is generated from today's data and carries its source. Take it and post it. You do not need to credit Project Curia. The card already does.
Bioguide ID A000382. Member data: unitedstates/congress-legislators. Headshot: unitedstates/images.
Alsobrooks on the issues
Cosponsored or voted for
Not on record unless marked
Extend ACA Subsidies Three Years
Extends the enhanced Affordable Care Act premium tax credits through 2028. Monthly premiums stay lower for people who buy their own coverage on the marketplace.
Cosponsored it, share of today’s members
Democrats 2%, Republicans 0%. Cosponsored it, share of today’s members.Fund HSAs Instead of Subsidies
The Senate Republicans' alternative. Instead of subsidizing insurers, the government puts cash into people's Health Savings Accounts, plus cost-sharing help, for those on bronze, catastrophic, and silver plans.
Cosponsored it, share of today’s members
Democrats 0%, Republicans 4%. Cosponsored it, share of today’s members.- Cosponsored
Make ACA Subsidies Permanent
Makes the enhanced ACA premium tax credits permanent. More people qualify for marketplace subsidies, and the subsidies stay larger, for good.
Cosponsored it, share of today’s members
Democrats 98%, Republicans 0%. Cosponsored it, share of today’s members. Rein In Drug Middlemen
Reins in the pharmacy benefit managers who sit between drugmakers and pharmacies. It curbs tactics like “spread pricing,” requires PBMs to pass manufacturer rebates through to health plans, and unlinks their pay from a drug's list price.
Cosponsored it, share of today’s members
Democrats 27%, Republicans 30%. Cosponsored it, share of today’s members.Benchmark Drug Prices to Other Countries
Compares brand-name drug prices against what five peer countries pay. If a U.S. price is judged “excessive,” the government strips the drug's market exclusivity and licenses generic competitors to force the price down.
Cosponsored it, share of today’s members
Democrats 16%, Republicans 0%. Cosponsored it, share of today’s members.
1 to 5 of 102 more measures exist only in the House, so they are not shown here.
How Alsobrooks has acted on the key bills behind the issues Americans care about most: a floor vote where one exists, and cosponsorship otherwise. Only measures the Senate can act on are counted. Open an issue to see each bill, Alsobrooks’s position on it and how both parties split. No recorded action is not opposition.
Share this record
Measures a majority of Democratic voters want and Alsobrooks has not cosponsored or voted for; pick one.
Every card is generated from today's data and carries its source. Take it and post it. You do not need to credit Project Curia. The card already does.
Bioguide ID A000382. Member data: unitedstates/congress-legislators. Headshot: unitedstates/images.
Alsobrooks on reform
Cosponsored 1 of the 6 reforms with a current bill. The seventh has no bill this Congress and is not counted. Not on record is not opposition.
Not on record unless marked
- Voters in favor of the question asked: Democrats 84%, Republicans 75%, Independents 81%
Verasight for the Brennan Center for Justice (an advocacy organization), Apr-May 2026
Voters asked: A constitutional amendment establishing that the federal and state governments may regulate and limit contributions to campaigns and campaign spending, including by placing greater limits on corporations than on individuals
- Voters in favor of the question asked: Democrats 88%, Republicans 85%, Independents 84%
Verasight for the Brennan Center for Justice (an advocacy organization), Apr-May 2026
Voters asked: A law that requires all organizations that spend money on federal campaigns to disclose their major donors and requires online political ads to say who paid for them
- Voters in favor of the question asked: Democrats 79%, Republicans 65%, Independents 70%
Emerson College / RealClear, commissioned by Unite America (an advocacy organization), Jan 2026
Voters asked: States should be required to hold open primaries where all voters can participate regardless of party registration.
- Voters in favor of the question asked: Democrats 76%, Republicans 57%, Independents 72%
Noble Predictive Insights for Common Cause (an advocacy organization), Sept 2025
Voters asked: Do you think it is good or bad for the country when one political party controls how voting districts are drawn?
Ban Stock Trading
Cosponsored a related bill, S. 1879, which does not carry the full reform.
Voters in favor of the question asked: Democrats 88%, Republicans 87%, Independents 81%U. of Maryland PPC, May 2023
Voters asked: Prohibit Members of Congress (in the House and Senate) and the family that lives with them, from trading stocks in individual companies. They would still be allowed to buy or sell shares of mutual funds or index funds that include stocks in numerous companies. In conclusion, do you favor or oppose this proposal?
- Voters in favor of the question asked: Democrats 67%, Republicans 65%, Independents not reported
U. of Maryland PPC, June 2022
Voters asked: Extend the period former Members of Congress must wait before lobbying Congress to five years.
- Voters in favor of the question asked: Democrats 74%, Republicans 71%, Independents not reported
U. of Maryland PPC, June 2022
Voters asked: Ban former senior Executive Branch officials from lobbying on behalf of a foreign government for the rest of their life.
Each marked row names what the member did: sponsored or cosponsored a bill carrying the reform, signed a discharge petition to force one to the floor, or cosponsored a prior version in a previous Congress while still serving today. Not on record means there is no documented signal. The member may still support or oppose; we have no evidence either way. Floor votes are not yet wired in, so nobody is marked Opposes.
Several reforms have bills carried almost entirely by one party. That makes the headline percentage a measure of cosponsorship on these specific bills, not a measure of underlying agreement with the reform. A 0% figure for one party often means “has not cosponsored this vehicle,” not “opposes the reform.”
A matching prior Congress cosponsorship also counts. No documented cosponsorship is not opposition.
Share this record
One reform at a time
Where Alsobrooks stands on the six reforms with a current bill. Prior matching cosponsorships are included.
Each card pairs a single reform with what Alsobrooks's own party's voters say about it. A filled dot means Alsobrooks cosponsored a bill. An open dot means no public position, which is not a vote against.
Every card is generated from today's data and carries its source. Take it and post it. You do not need to credit Project Curia. The card already does.
Bioguide ID A000382. Member data: unitedstates/congress-legislators. Headshot: unitedstates/images.