Skip to content
Project Curia

California

U.S. Representative · California · District 51

Sara Jacobs

DemocratTerm through January 2027

Reform stances

Where Jacobs stands.

Supports 5 of the seven reforms.

  1. 01
    Overturn Citizens United

    Cosponsor · Oct 6, 2025 · HJRES-121-119

    Supports
  2. 02
    Disclose Dark Money

    Cosponsored prior version · HR-1-117

    Supports
  3. 03
    Open Primaries

    Cosponsored prior version · HR-1-117

    Supports
  4. 04
    End Gerrymandering

    Cosponsor · Sep 18, 2025 · HR-5449-119

    Supports
  5. 05
    Ban Stock Trading

    Signed discharge petition · 2025120211

    Supports
  6. Unknown
  7. Unknown
How this is scored

Supports means the member sponsored or cosponsored a bill carrying the reform, signed a discharge petition to force one to the floor, or cosponsored a prior version in a previous Congress while still serving today. Unknown means there is no documented signal. The member may still support or oppose; we have no evidence either way. Floor votes are not yet wired in, so nobody is marked Opposes.

Several reforms have bills carried almost entirely by one party. That makes the headline percentage a measure of cosponsorship on these specific bills, not a measure of underlying agreement with the reform. A 0% figure for one party often means “has not cosponsored this vehicle,” not “opposes the reform.”

Full methodology →

Compare Jacobs with Senator Schiff

On the issues

Where Jacobs stands on the issues.

How Jacobs has acted on the key bills behind the issues Americans care about most. A floor vote where one exists, and cosponsorship otherwise. Each bill also shows how both parties in Jacobs's chamber split, so you can see where Jacobs lands. Open an issue to see the detail.

Health Care AffordabilityBacked 3 of 8
Market-Based Premium ReliefVoted no

The House Republicans' health package. It expands association health plans, lets employers fund workers' own coverage, funds ACA cost-sharing payments, and adds PBM transparency rules. It does not extend the enhanced subsidies.

0% Democrats96% Republicans
Make ACA Subsidies PermanentCosponsored

Makes the enhanced ACA premium tax credits permanent. More people qualify for marketplace subsidies, and the subsidies stay larger, for good.

74% Democrats0% Republicans
Rein In Drug MiddlemenNo position

Reins in the pharmacy benefit managers who sit between drugmakers and pharmacies. It curbs tactics like “spread pricing,” requires PBMs to pass manufacturer rebates through to health plans, and unlinks their pay from a drug's list price.

14% Democrats18% Republicans
Health Care Price TransparencyNo position

Writes hospital and insurer price-transparency rules into law. Hospitals, insurers, labs, imaging providers, and surgery centers would have to post the actual prices they charge, so patients can compare.

0% Democrats0% Republicans
Benchmark Drug Prices to Other CountriesNo position

Compares brand-name drug prices against what five peer countries pay. If a U.S. price is judged “excessive,” the government strips the drug's market exclusivity and licenses generic competitors to force the price down.

2% Democrats0% Republicans
Medicare for AllCosponsored

Replaces private health insurance with a single government-run program that covers everyone. There are no premiums or deductibles for covered care.

53% Democrats0% Republicans
Undo the 2025 Medicaid CutsCosponsored

Repeals the Medicaid, Medicare, and health-tax provisions of the 2025 reconciliation law, and makes the enhanced marketplace premium tax credits permanent.

65% Democrats0% Republicans
Reverse the Marketplace Sign-Up LimitsNo position

Cancels the 2025 federal rule that shortened the window to sign up for marketplace coverage and added paperwork checks before people can enroll outside it.

17% Democrats0% Republicans

2 more measures exist only in the Senate, so it isn't shown here.

See the whole issue →

The Federal DeficitBacked 0 of 8
Rescind Enacted SpendingVoted no

Cancels money Congress has already approved. The 2025 version clawed back about $9 billion, mostly from foreign aid and public broadcasting, and was signed into law.

0% Democrats95% Republicans
Restore Impoundment PowerNo position

Repeals the 1974 law that bars a president from refusing to spend money Congress has appropriated. It would let the president “impound” funds, that is, decline to spend them, to hold down federal outlays.

0% Democrats11% Republicans
Constitutional Spending CapVoted no

A constitutional amendment capping total federal spending in a year at the average revenue collected over the prior three years, forcing the budget toward balance over time. It would also require a two-thirds vote of both chambers to raise any tax. The House voted on it in 2026 and it fell short of the two-thirds required.

0% Democrats95% Republicans
Bipartisan Fiscal CommissionNo position

Creates a bipartisan commission of lawmakers and outside experts to write a plan to stabilize the debt, with a guaranteed up-or-down vote in Congress. It doesn't choose the spending cuts or tax increases itself; it forces a process to decide.

10% Democrats10% Republicans
Surtax on Top IncomesNo position

Adds an extra tax on income above roughly $1 million a year, on top of the existing rates.

5% Democrats0% Republicans
Tax on Unrealized GainsNo position

Taxes the yearly rise in the value of billionaires' assets, such as stock, even before they are sold. Today those gains are taxed only when the asset is sold, if ever.

16% Democrats0% Republicans
Annual Wealth TaxNo position

Levies a yearly tax on net worth above $50 million, a small percentage of a household's total wealth rather than its income, rising for billionaires.

23% Democrats0% Republicans
Keep Spending Power With CongressNo position

Tightens the 1974 law the impoundment repeal would undo. It bars fast-track procedures for withholding funds, expands what the executive branch must report about money it has not spent, and adds penalties for refusing to spend what Congress appropriated.

11% Democrats0% Republicans

See the whole issue →

Gun PolicyBacked 5 of 10
Universal Background ChecksCosponsored

Requires a background check for nearly all firearm sales, including private transfers between individuals. Today only licensed dealers must run the check; sales between private parties are generally exempt.

97% Democrats1% Republicans
Safe Firearm StorageCosponsored

Sets a federal safe-storage standard: firearms in a home where a minor could reach them must be locked or otherwise secured, with penalties when an unsecured gun is accessed. It is named for a teenager killed by an unsecured firearm.

90% Democrats0% Republicans
Raise the Purchase Age to 21Cosponsored

Raises the minimum age to buy certain semiautomatic rifles and shotguns from a licensed dealer from 18 to 21. Handgun sales from dealers already carry a 21-and-older minimum.

78% Democrats0% Republicans
Assault Weapons BanCosponsored

Bans the manufacture, sale, and import of many semiautomatic rifles and pistols the bill defines as “assault weapons,” along with the large-capacity magazines it defines. Firearms already owned are grandfathered in.

85% Democrats0% Republicans
Red-Flag Protection OrdersNo position

Funds and creates a federal extreme-risk protection order: a court process letting police or family members ask a judge to temporarily remove firearms from a person found to be a danger to themselves or others.

2% Democrats0% Republicans
Block Federal Red-Flag FundingNo position

Bars the use of federal funds to carry out or enforce red-flag laws. It is the direct counter to the red-flag protection-order bill above.

0% Democrats1% Republicans
Concealed-Carry ReciprocityNo position

Requires every state to honor concealed-carry permits issued by any other state, so a permit valid in one state would let its holder carry a concealed handgun in all of them, overriding stricter local carry rules.

0% Democrats84% Republicans
Suppressor DeregulationNo position

Removes firearm suppressors (“silencers”) from the National Firearms Act, ending the federal registration and extra screening that buying one now requires. They would be sold like ordinary firearm accessories.

0% Democrats53% Republicans
Let Gun Victims Sue ManufacturersCosponsored

Repeals the 2005 law that shields gun makers and dealers from most lawsuits over crimes committed with the guns they sell, and opens the federal firearm-trace data to the public.

53% Democrats0% Republicans
Stop VA Reports to the Gun DatabaseVoted no

Bars the Department of Veterans Affairs from sending the names of veterans it has found unable to manage their own financial affairs to the NICS background-check database. Today that VA finding alone can bar a veteran from buying a gun.

3% Democrats94% Republicans

See the whole issue →

Climate ChangeBacked 1 of 10
Bring Back the Clean Energy Tax CreditsCosponsored

Undoes the 2025 tax law's repeal of the clean-energy tax credits. It would restore the discounts for solar, wind, batteries, home efficiency upgrades, and electric vehicles that Congress cancelled.

73% Democrats0% Republicans
Give Clean Energy Projects Their Deadlines BackNo position

Removes the accelerated construction deadlines the 2025 tax law placed on the wind, solar, and hydrogen tax credits, so projects already underway do not lose their financing by missing a cutoff.

0% Democrats3% Republicans
Charge Polluting Imports a Carbon PriceNo position

Sets a fee on imported steel, cement, and other heavy industrial goods based on how much carbon pollution it took to make them, and holds American producers to the same standard.

3% Democrats0% Republicans
Clear Out Wildfire Fuel FasterVoted no

Speeds up environmental reviews for forest-thinning and controlled-burn projects on federal land, and sets up a joint federal center to coordinate wildfire work. The House passed it in 2025.

29% Democrats95% Republicans
Overhaul Disaster ResponseNo position

Rewrites how the federal disaster agency works. It would make FEMA an independent cabinet-level agency, shift money toward reducing damage before a disaster rather than paying for it after, and simplify aid for survivors.

17% Democrats24% Republicans
Fast-Track Nuclear Fuel PlantsNo position

Puts the Nuclear Regulatory Commission on a deadline when it licenses the plants that make and recycle fuel for advanced reactors, the step that currently holds up new reactors.

4% Democrats9% Republicans
Undo California's EV Sales MandateVoted no

Cancels the federal permission that let California require carmakers to sell a rising share of zero-emission vehicles, a standard more than a dozen other states had adopted. It passed both chambers and was signed into law in 2025.

16% Democrats93% Republicans
Scrap the Methane Emissions FeeVoted no

Kills the federal charge that made oil and gas companies pay for the methane they leak or vent into the air, a fee created by the 2022 climate law. It passed both chambers and was signed into law in 2025.

3% Democrats95% Republicans
Approve LNG Exports AutomaticallyVoted no

Declares that all exports of natural gas are in the public interest, which removes the Energy Department's power to review or turn down an application to export it. The House passed it in 2025; the Senate has not voted.

5% Democrats91% Republicans
Bar a Federal Fracking BanVoted no

Stops a president from declaring a moratorium on hydraulic fracturing unless Congress votes to allow one, and says the states should keep the primary authority to regulate fracking on state and private land. The House passed it in 2025.

7% Democrats93% Republicans

See the whole issue →

Contact

Reach Jacobs's office.

Office phone
202-225-2040
Email
Email Jacobs
Washington office
2348 Rayburn House Office Building Washington DC 20515-0551

The office phone is a staffed line answered by Jacobs's congressional staff, and the email link opens the member's official contact form. Members of Congress do not publish personal cell numbers or direct email addresses.

Share this record

Download Jacobs's record as a card and post it. It is generated from today's cosponsorship data and carries its own sources, so it stands on its own wherever it lands.

One reform at a time

Each card pairs a single reform with what Jacobs's own party's voters say about it. A filled dot means Jacobs cosponsored a bill. An open dot means no public position, which is not a vote against.

Every card is generated from today's data and carries its source. Take it and post it. You do not need to credit Project Curia. The card already does.