U.S. Representative · Texas · District 8
Morgan Luttrell
RepublicanTerm through January 2027
Backs 4 of the 11 issues their own party’s voters want.
How the grade works, and where everyone stands →ABacks 4 of the 11 issues their own party’s voters want.
How the grade works, and where everyone stands →Curia grade
Polled measures where they side with their own party's voters
Floor votes we have decoded and recorded for them
Individual stock trades they disclosed under the STOCK Act
Share of their campaign money from small donors under $200
Of the 7 reforms most voters want, how many they have cosponsored
On the issues
Where Luttrell stands on the issues.
How Luttrell has acted on the key bills behind the issues Americans care about most. A floor vote where one exists, and cosponsorship otherwise. Open an issue to see the bills and how both parties split.
Health Care AffordabilityBacked 1 of 8
- Voted yes
Market-Based Premium Relief
The House Republicans' health package. It expands association health plans, lets employers fund workers' own coverage, funds ACA cost-sharing payments, and adds PBM transparency rules. It does not extend the enhanced subsidies.
The record · roll no. 349Democrats0%Republicans96% - No position
Make ACA Subsidies Permanent
Makes the enhanced ACA premium tax credits permanent. More people qualify for marketplace subsidies, and the subsidies stay larger, for good.
Democrats74%Republicans0% - No position
Rein In Drug Middlemen
Reins in the pharmacy benefit managers who sit between drugmakers and pharmacies. It curbs tactics like “spread pricing,” requires PBMs to pass manufacturer rebates through to health plans, and unlinks their pay from a drug's list price.
Democrats14%Republicans18% - No position
Health Care Price Transparency
Writes hospital and insurer price-transparency rules into law. Hospitals, insurers, labs, imaging providers, and surgery centers would have to post the actual prices they charge, so patients can compare.
Democrats0%Republicans0%
4 more measures exist only in the Senate, so it isn't shown here.
The Federal DeficitBacked 2 of 8
- Voted yes
Rescind Enacted Spending
Cancels money Congress has already approved. The 2025 version clawed back about $9 billion, mostly from foreign aid and public broadcasting, and was signed into law.
The record · roll no. 168Democrats0%Republicans95% - No position
Restore Impoundment Power
Repeals the 1974 law that bars a president from refusing to spend money Congress has appropriated. It would let the president “impound” funds, that is, decline to spend them, to hold down federal outlays.
Democrats0%Republicans11% - Voted yes
Constitutional Spending Cap
A constitutional amendment capping total federal spending in a year at the average revenue collected over the prior three years, forcing the budget toward balance over time. It would also require a two-thirds vote of both chambers to raise any tax. The House voted on it in 2026 and it fell short of the two-thirds required.
The record · roll no. 95Democrats0%Republicans95% - No position
Bipartisan Fiscal Commission
Creates a bipartisan commission of lawmakers and outside experts to write a plan to stabilize the debt, with a guaranteed up-or-down vote in Congress. It doesn't choose the spending cuts or tax increases itself; it forces a process to decide.
Democrats10%Republicans10%
Drug AddictionBacked 3 of 5
- Voted yes
Permanently Schedule Fentanyl-Related Drugs
Permanently places all fentanyl-related substances into Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act, the most tightly controlled category, so making or selling any chemical cousin of fentanyl carries the same penalties as fentanyl itself. Before this, the class was scheduled only under temporary orders that had to be renewed.
The record · roll no. 33Democrats47%Republicans96% - Voted yes
Sanction Chinese Fentanyl Suppliers
Widens the definition of a “foreign opioid trafficker” to cover Chinese people and entities that make or sell the chemicals used to produce fentanyl, so the government can impose financial sanctions on that supply chain.
The record · roll no. 220Democrats91%Republicans93% - Voted yes
Reauthorize the Addiction Grant Programs
Reauthorizes the federal government's main set of grant programs for preventing and treating substance use disorders through 2030: money for youth prevention, recovery housing, peer-support and recovery services, overdose-reversal drugs, and loan repayment for addiction-treatment providers.
The record · roll no. 151Democrats81%Republicans83% - No position
Prescribe Addiction Medications by Telehealth
Permanently lets clinicians prescribe medications for opioid use disorder, such as buprenorphine, over telehealth, without requiring an in-person visit first. It makes permanent a flexibility that began during the pandemic.
Democrats11%Republicans4% - No position
Let Pharmacies Dispense Methadone
Lets addiction specialists prescribe methadone for opioid use disorder and lets ordinary pharmacies fill it, breaking the current rule that methadone for addiction can be dispensed only at federally licensed opioid-treatment clinics.
Democrats1%Republicans0%
2 more measures exist only in the Senate, so it isn't shown here.
Gun PolicyBacked 3 of 11
- No position
Universal Background Checks
Requires a background check for nearly all firearm sales, including private transfers between individuals. Today only licensed dealers must run the check; sales between private parties are generally exempt.
Democrats97%Republicans1% - No position
Safe Firearm Storage
Sets a federal safe-storage standard: firearms in a home where a minor could reach them must be locked or otherwise secured, with penalties when an unsecured gun is accessed. It is named for a teenager killed by an unsecured firearm.
Democrats90%Republicans0% - No position
Raise the Purchase Age to 21
Raises the minimum age to buy certain semiautomatic rifles and shotguns from a licensed dealer from 18 to 21. Handgun sales from dealers already carry a 21-and-older minimum.
Democrats78%Republicans0% - No position
Assault Weapons Ban
Bans the manufacture, sale, and import of many semiautomatic rifles and pistols the bill defines as “assault weapons,” along with the large-capacity magazines it defines. Firearms already owned are grandfathered in.
Democrats88%Republicans0%
Climate ChangeBacked 5 of 10
- No position
Bring Back the Clean Energy Tax Credits
Undoes the 2025 tax law's repeal of the clean-energy tax credits. It would restore the discounts for solar, wind, batteries, home efficiency upgrades, and electric vehicles that Congress cancelled.
Democrats74%Republicans0% - No position
Give Clean Energy Projects Their Deadlines Back
Removes the accelerated construction deadlines the 2025 tax law placed on the wind, solar, and hydrogen tax credits, so projects already underway do not lose their financing by missing a cutoff.
Democrats0%Republicans3% - No position
Charge Polluting Imports a Carbon Price
Sets a fee on imported steel, cement, and other heavy industrial goods based on how much carbon pollution it took to make them, and holds American producers to the same standard.
Democrats3%Republicans0% - Voted yes
Clear Out Wildfire Fuel Faster
Speeds up environmental reviews for forest-thinning and controlled-burn projects on federal land, and sets up a joint federal center to coordinate wildfire work. The House passed it in 2025.
The record · roll no. 25Democrats31%Republicans95%
ImmigrationBacked 4 of 13
- Voted yes
Detain and Deport for Theft Crimes
Requires the federal government to detain immigrants without legal status who are arrested for or charged with theft-related crimes, assaulting a police officer, or a crime causing death or serious injury. It also lets states sue the federal government over immigration-enforcement decisions.
The record · roll no. 23Democrats21%Republicans96% - Voted yes
Fund Border and Interior Enforcement
Provides about $70 billion through 2029 to the Department of Homeland Security, Customs and Border Protection, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement for border security and immigration enforcement.
The record · roll no. 214Democrats0%Republicans97% - Voted yes
Raise Penalties for Illegal Reentry
Increases the criminal penalties for entering the country illegally after a prior removal, and for assaulting a Border Patrol agent.
The record · roll no. 264Democrats5%Republicans95% - No position
Require E-Verify for All Employers
Requires every employer in the country to check whether a new hire is authorized to work, using a federal electronic verification system, and phases the requirement in over time.
Democrats0%Republicans19%
Tracked votes
How Luttrell voted lately.
The most recent bills Congress voted on, and how Luttrell voted on each. We read every one and wrote down what it does. Open any bill for the plain-language decode, or see the full record below.
- HR 7008Stop Insider Trading ActJul 22, 2026 · Passed Chamber · Bundled · congress.gov ↗Yea
House vote · 232-198
Democrats13–198Republicans218–0Independents1–0 - HR 1118Value over Cost Act of 2026Jul 21, 2026 · Government Operations and Politics · Passed Chamber · congress.gov ↗Yea
House vote · 421-1
Democrats210–0Republicans210–1Independents1–0 - HR 6955Main Street Capital Access ActJul 21, 2026 · Finance and Financial Sector · Passed Chamber · congress.gov ↗Yea
House vote · 270-155
Democrats56–154Republicans213–1Independents1–0 - HR 9770FY2027 Continuing ResolutionJul 21, 2026 · Economics and Public Finance · Passed Chamber · congress.gov ↗Yea
House vote · 220-205
Democrats6–204Republicans213–1Independents1–0 - HR 8823Putting Patients First by Strengthening Provider Accountability in FECA ActJul 20, 2026 · Government Operations and Politics · Passed Chamber · congress.gov ↗Yea
House vote · 396-0
Democrats198–0Republicans197–0Independents1–0 - HR 4541EARLY Act and SCREENS for Cancer ActJul 20, 2026 · Health · Passed Chamber · Bundled · congress.gov ↗Yea
House vote · 394-6
Democrats200–0Republicans193–6Independents1–0
A “not voting” mark means Luttrell was not recorded on that roll call. Members miss votes for many reasons, from travel to illness to leadership duties.
Luttrell has disclosed no stock trades.
Most members of Congress do not trade individual stocks. Those who do disclose each trade under the STOCK Act, and we track it. Luttrell has none on record.
Who funds Luttrell
The money behind Luttrell.
Luttrell raised $1.9 million across the 2023–2024 cycle. Whether it came from small donors, large donors, or PACs is the clearest read on who a member answers to.
26% of the money Luttrell raised came from small donors.
- Small donors
- 26%$0.5M
- Large donors
- 35%$0.7M
- Bundled
- 0%$0
- PACs
- 19%$0.4M
- Other
- 19%$0.4M
Reform stances
Where Luttrell stands on reform.
Cosponsored0/ 7of the seven reforms most Americans want in both parties.
- No position
Overturn Citizens United
At least 75% of voters in each party want this. This member has taken no position.
Democrats84%Republicans75%Independents81%Voters: Verasight for the Brennan Center for Justice (an advocacy organization), Apr–May 2026
- No position
Disclose Dark Money
At least 85% of voters in each party want this. This member has taken no position.
Democrats88%Republicans85%Independents84%Voters: Verasight for the Brennan Center for Justice (an advocacy organization), Apr–May 2026
- No position
Open Primaries
At least 65% of voters in each party want this. This member has taken no position.
Democrats79%Republicans65%Independents70%Voters: Emerson College / RealClear, commissioned by Unite America (an advocacy organization), Jan 2026
- No position
End Gerrymandering
At least 57% of voters in each party want this. This member has taken no position.
Democrats76%Republicans57%Independents72%Voters: Noble Predictive Insights for Common Cause (an advocacy organization), Sept 2025
- No position
Ban Stock Trading
At least 87% of voters in each party want this. This member has taken no position.
Democrats88%Republicans87%Independents81%Voters: U. of Maryland PPC, 2023
- No position
Extend Cool-Off Period
At least 65% of voters in each party want this. This member has taken no position.
Democrats67%Republicans65%Independents—Voters: U. of Maryland PPC, June 2022
- No position
Stop Foreign Lobbying
At least 71% of voters in each party want this. This member has taken no position.
Democrats74%Republicans71%Independents—Voters: U. of Maryland PPC, June 2022
How this is scored
Supports means the member sponsored or cosponsored a bill carrying the reform, signed a discharge petition to force one to the floor, or cosponsored a prior version in a previous Congress while still serving today. Unknown means there is no documented signal. The member may still support or oppose; we have no evidence either way. Floor votes are not yet wired in, so nobody is marked Opposes.
Several reforms have bills carried almost entirely by one party. That makes the headline percentage a measure of cosponsorship on these specific bills, not a measure of underlying agreement with the reform. A 0% figure for one party often means “has not cosponsored this vehicle,” not “opposes the reform.”
Contact
Reach Luttrell's office.
- Office phone
- 202-225-4901
- Email Luttrell →
- Washington office
- 444 Cannon House Office Building Washington DC 20515-4308
A staffed line and the official contact form; members do not publish direct numbers.
Share this record
Luttrell's record as a card, generated from today's data with its sources printed on it.
Measures a majority of Republican voters want and Luttrell has not backed; pick one.

