Representative, Texas, District 10
Michael T. McCaul
Republican. In Congress since 2005. Age 64. Term ends January 2027.
This seat is on the ballot November 3, 2026.
Raised: campaign receipts in the 2023-2024 cycle, from FEC filings. Stock trades: every trade disclosed on a periodic report, ranked against the House. Floor votes: the roll calls Curia has recorded for McCaul on the bills it reads in plain language, including rolls they missed. Bills written: measures McCaul sponsored in the 119th Congress. The median is the middle sitting member of the House.
Campaign money
Receipts in the 2023-2024 cycle
- Small donors
- 12%$0.4M
- Large donors
- 21%$0.7M
- Bundled
- 14%$0.4M
- PACs
- 23%$0.7M
- Other
- 30%$1.0M
- The median House memberShare raised from small donors
- 5%
- PAC and bundled moneyFrom every organization on file
- $1.1M
Stock trades
Disclosed on periodic reports, by year
- Trades in Information TechnologyThe sector traded most
- 538
- Assets disclosedOn the 2024 annual filing
- At least $34M
Votes
Floor votes on the bills Curia reads, newest first
H.R. 5334, Sep 16, 2026
Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026
YesBecame LawBundled
Bills written
As sponsor in the 119th Congress, latest step first
H.Res. 1600
In committee, Oct 1, 2026
H.R. 10370
Ailani Myers Accelerating Innovation in Medicine to Cure Kids with Cancer Act
In committee, Sep 14, 2026
Issues
With Republican voters on 3 of 10 polled measures
Cosponsored or voted for
- 2 of 8
- 3 of 5
- 2 of 11
- 5 of 10
- 5 of 13
The polled measures are the key bills behind the issues Americans care about most, where a poll shows what each party’s voters want. A row counts McCaul’s floor vote where one exists and cosponsorship otherwise, on the measures the House can act on. No recorded action is not opposition. Each issue opens in the Issues lens with every bill and how both parties split.
McCaul among the House
McCaul votes further right than 62% of the House.
Source: DW-NOMINATE, Voteview at UCLA, 119th Congress
Each mark is one of the 437 representatives sitting today, placed by how often they vote with each other rather than by anything we think of them. DW-NOMINATE, the standard academic measure, computed by Voteview at UCLA over the 119th Congress and read here as of August 2026. It is built only from recorded votes: 489 of them for McCaul. It says who votes together, not who is right.
Committees
In the 119th Congress
- Foreign Affairs
- Homeland SecurityVice Chair
Voting in Texas
General election
November 3, 2026
Register 30 days before the election.
Reach McCaul’s office
- Office phone202-225-2401
- Official websitemccaul.house.gov
- Washington office2300 Rayburn House Office Building Washington DC 20515-4310
A staffed line and the official website; members do not publish direct numbers.
Cosponsored or voted for 3 of the 10 measures their own party’s voters want.
How the grade works, and where everyone stands →CCosponsored or voted for 3 of the 10 measures their own party’s voters want.
How the grade works, and where everyone stands →Curia grade
No documented cosponsorship of the 6 reforms with a current bill
Bioguide ID M001157. Member data: unitedstates/congress-legislators. Headshot: unitedstates/images.
Campaign money
Raised, 2023-2024 cycle
$3.1M
- Cash on handAt the end of the 2023-2024 cycle
- $131K
12% of the money McCaul raised came from small donors.
- Small donors
- 12%
- $0.4M
- Large donors
- 21%
- $0.7M
- Bundled
- 14%
- $0.4M
- PACs
- 23%
- $0.7M
- Other
- 30%
- $1.0M
Everything that is not small-donor, large-donor, or PAC money. Mostly money transferred in from committees the candidate authorized, such as joint fundraising committees, which report their own donors to the FEC.
Total Other
$1.0M31% of receipts
- Transfers from joint fundraising and other authorized committees
- 31%$1.0M
- Self-funding
- 0%$0
- Party committee money
- 0%$0
- Refunds, offsets, miscellaneous
- 0%$0
FEC-disclosed receipts for the 2023-2024 cycle. “Small” means contributions from donors who gave $200 or less in total, which the FEC does not require to be itemized.
This is the disclosed money only. Spending by outside groups that do not reveal their donors, the dark money that set a record in 2024, never appears in these figures.
Every percentage here is a share of all receipts, not of individual contributions only. So the small-donor share counts transfers, loans and other money in its base, and reads lower than figures that divide only by individual money.
FEC filings read October 31, 2026.
Against the House median
- Small-donor share
- 12%vs 5% House median
- PAC share
- 23%vs 37% House median
PACs and bundled gifts
2023-2024 cycle, largest first.
An organization reaches a member two ways. Its own PAC writes a direct check. And it bundles: it gathers individual donations from its supporters and routes them through its conduit. Both count here as one “organized” total. The bundled part is already inside the individual giving shown in the funding mix above. Here it is regrouped by the organization that gathered it, so you can see who did the organizing.
Money an organization gave through its PAC or bundled from its people to McCaul’s campaign, the 2023-2024 cycle, largest first. Showing the top 15 of 194 organizations with a stake. Source: FEC filings, as of October 2026.
Industries
Organized money, by the industry of the group that gave it
$1.1Morganized, every industry below
- Pro-Israel39%$447K
- Tech & Telecom10%$111K
- Agriculture & Food9%$101K
- Finance & Insurance7%$84K
- Defense & Aerospace6%$67K
Each organization is grouped by industry from its FEC name, which is approximate. This is the same organized money as the list above, regrouped by industry.
PAC figures are contributions to McCaul’s campaign committee from FEC filings. Industry labels are grouped from each committee’s name and are approximate. Joint fundraising committees and small-dollar conduits like ActBlue and WinRed are not counted.
Outside spending
- Firefighters Coalition of America PAC$27K$27K
All outside groups: to elect $29K, to defeat none, total $29K
Outside groups also spend on their own to elect or defeat McCaul, running ads for or against the race. This money never passes through the campaign, so it is counted apart from the money organized for McCaul. Whether a dollar supported or opposed McCaul is the group’s own filing, never our reading.
The colour names the side the money helps: spending to elect McCaul helps McCaul’s party, and spending to defeat McCaul helps the other side. The totals cover every group that spent; the list shows the largest.
Trips paid by others
Since 2019
- Sep 25, 2026, staffNew York, NY
Paid by Council on Foreign Relations
- Aug 4, 2025, staffCambridge, MD
Paid by Congressional Institute
- Apr 22, 2025, McCaulItaly
Paid by Aspen Institute, Inc. and the Rockefeller Foundation
Travel a private sponsor paid for, filed by McCaul’s office with the House or Senate ethics office, by McCaul or by staff. Newest first.
Dark money disclosure
84%
Support for the question asked
Congress has not passed the DISCLOSE Act.
Voters asked: A law that requires all organizations that spend money on federal campaigns to disclose their major donors and requires online political ads to say who paid for them
Cite this page
The citation names the source data used for this record.
Share this record
Where McCaul's campaign money comes from: small donors, large donors, and PACs.
Every card is generated from today's data and carries its source. Take it and post it. You do not need to credit Project Curia. The card already does.
Bioguide ID M001157. Member data: unitedstates/congress-legislators. Headshot: unitedstates/images.
Stock trades
More active than >99% of the House.
Buys vs. sells
48% bought · 52% sold
Disclosed trades
3,936
ranked 2 of 439
Filed late
6%
229 past the 45-day window
Est. volume
$324.1M
midpoint estimate
Periodic transaction reports, which the STOCK Act asks for within 45 days of most trades in individual stocks and bonds. Trades in qualifying funds are reported only once a year, on the annual disclosure, and are not counted here. Filed late counts trades reported more than 45 days after the trade.
Trades by year
Disclosed on periodic reports, by the year of the trade
Source: House Clerk and Senate periodic transaction reports
Sectors
- Information Technology14%538
- Industrials9%375
- Financials8%313
Each trade is counted once, in its company’s sector. Counts are exact; disclosed amounts are ranges, so no dollar totals are shown by sector.
Committee overlap
None of McCaul’s trades are filed as McCaul’s own, so there is nothing here to test.
No apparent conflicts are shown here. The flag tests only the trades a filing marks as the member’s own. None of McCaul’s disclosed trades are coded that way. They are attributed to a spouse, held jointly, or left unspecified, so there is nothing here to test. This is a limit of the disclosure record, not a finding of no conflict.
Disclosed trades
Sold unless marked · Spouse unless marked
All 31 trade reports McCaul has filed with the House Clerk since 2024 are read here. On the scanned paper reports that are read, 329 rows could not be read clearly from the page image and are left out. The Clerk’s own index is the complete record. Trades from scanned paper reports are read by machine from the page image. Amounts are ranges, never exact; every row links to the official filing. A symbol marked with an asterisk was matched from the company name on the filing. The filer did not write a symbol down.
Cite this page
The citation names the source data used for this record.
Share this record
McCaul's disclosed stock-trading record: how many trades, how much volume, and whether any fall in an industry their committees oversee.
Every card is generated from today's data and carries its source. Take it and post it. You do not need to credit Project Curia. The card already does.
Bioguide ID M001157. Member data: unitedstates/congress-legislators. Headshot: unitedstates/images.
Income beyond salary
Reported
No form counted
Net worth
Disclosed assets and liabilities, each as the range McCaul’s 2024 annual filing allows, never netted.
Disclosed assets
At least $34M
as ranges on 171 line items, plus 5 without a dollar value; 17 of those ranges are open ended
Disclosed liabilities
-
not machine readable from this filing yet
No form is counted: 18 forms filed on paper and not read yet, 2 years with no form online and 1 year with the form not collected. Salary is the $174,000 annual rate, set apart from every figure here.
The annual rate set by law for the latest year in office: $174,000. A first year is paid by days, so it is smaller. Salary is separate from every figure beyond it.
These are the lower and upper bounds of the ranges on the filing, not a market valuation. Assets and liabilities are shown separately and are never netted into a net worth. How these bands are read
Kept since Aug 28, 2026. Federal law generally requires a filing to be destroyed six years after the member leaves office, unless it is needed in an ongoing investigation.
Annual financial disclosure reports filed with the Clerk of the House and the Secretary of the Senate; salary from the Congressional Research Service (97-1011).
Share this record
Where McCaul's campaign money comes from: small donors, large donors, and PACs.
Every card is generated from today's data and carries its source. Take it and post it. You do not need to credit Project Curia. The card already does.
Bioguide ID M001157. Member data: unitedstates/congress-legislators. Headshot: unitedstates/images.
The votes McCaul cast on the bills this site reads and writes up, not every roll call the chamber took. A position is the member’s own recorded vote on that bill’s passage. Broke with party marks a vote cast against the majority of McCaul’s own party; it is never set for a vote of present, a missed vote, an independent, or a party evenly split. Each party’s bar fills with the share of its members who voted yea, beside its yea and nay count. A not voting mark means McCaul was not recorded on that roll call. Members miss votes for many reasons, from travel to illness to leadership duties.
House Clerk and Senate roll call records, joined to the bills this site decodes. Every row opens to a plain summary of the bill, a link to where every member stood, and the bill on Congress.gov.
Share this record
Where McCaul broke with their party on a tracked vote. Pick a vote from the five most recent.
Every card is generated from today's data and carries its source. Take it and post it. You do not need to credit Project Curia. The card already does.
Bioguide ID M001157. Member data: unitedstates/congress-legislators. Headshot: unitedstates/images.
Measures McCaul sponsored
Introduced in the 119th Congress, January 2025 to October 2026, latest stage date first.
Referred unless marked
- H.Res. 1600
House Committee on Education and Workforce
Oct 1, 2026 - H.R. 10370
House Committee on Energy and Commerce
Sep 14, 2026 - H.R. 10076
House Committee on Foreign Affairs, and 6 other committees
Aug 10, 2026 - H.R. 9631
House Committee on Natural Resources, and 2 other committees
Jul 9, 2026
The sponsor is the member who introduced the measure, a different act from cosponsoring somebody else’s. A resolution that its chamber, or both chambers, agreed to has finished its process and is filed under Adopted.
Where the stage and place are the same for the rows shown, a row gives the number of members listed as cosponsors of the measure in the same bulk data instead.
The stage on each measure is the furthest point the record states it reached, and the date is when it reached it. A measure that stops at a stage has not necessarily ended: text is regularly folded into another vehicle that moves on under a different number, and the record against this number simply stops being written. Nothing here counts, names or ranks what did not happen.
Committee stages come from dated committee activities. Passage, presentation and veto stages come from the measure’s own actions; law records identify enactment. The date beside the bill number belongs to the stage shown below.
Source: govinfo BILLSTATUS bulk data for the 119th Congress, as of 2026-10-31, with the sponsor of record from the same bulk data and committee names from the House and Senate committee rosters. Download this list as JSON, the sponsorship and stage record, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.
Lobbying on McCaul’s bills
10 of 14 bills named
Lobbying reports (LD-2) whose issue text names one of McCaul’s bills by number, counted as a floor: a report may describe a bill without its number. Most named first. Source: the Senate lobbying disclosure database.
Sponsored and cosponsored
186 measures in the 119th Congress: 14 sponsored, 172 cosponsored.
Cosponsoring puts a member’s name on a text. It is a public position, not a vote, and not a promise of one.
Most cosponsorships are signed when the measure is introduced; a row says so only when the name was added later, or withdrawn.
A policy area that does not appear here is one McCaul has not put a name on in this Congress. That is silence, not opposition, and it is left blank rather than counted.
The Library of Congress files each measure under one policy area; the shares cover the 185 of 186 measures on this record that carry one. It adds finer legislative subjects to only part of the corpus: the subjects cover 75 of 186, and show the 10 most common of 241.
Source: govinfo BILLSTATUS bulk data for the 119th Congress, rows from January 3, 2025 to October 19, 2026. Archives downloaded October 31, 2026. Newest source record by type: HCONRES 2026-10-30; HJRES 2026-10-31; HR 2026-10-31; HRES 2026-10-31; S 2026-10-31; SCONRES 2026-10-29; SJRES 2026-10-29; SRES 2026-10-31.
The 10 most common of 241 subjects, on the 75 of 186 measures the Library labels in detail.
- Congressional oversight25
- Government information and archives12
- Congressional tributes11
- Asia10
- Diplomacy, foreign officials, Americans abroad10
- State and local government operations10
- Border security and unlawful immigration8
- China8
- Computers and information technology8
- Government studies and investigations8
Share this record
One reform at a time
Where McCaul stands on the six reforms with a current bill. Prior matching cosponsorships are included.
Each card pairs a single reform with what McCaul's own party's voters say about it. A filled dot means McCaul cosponsored a bill. An open dot means no public position, which is not a vote against.
Every card is generated from today's data and carries its source. Take it and post it. You do not need to credit Project Curia. The card already does.
Bioguide ID M001157. Member data: unitedstates/congress-legislators. Headshot: unitedstates/images.
McCaul on the issues
Cosponsored or voted for
Not on record unless marked
- Did not vote
Extend ACA Subsidies Three Years
Extends the enhanced Affordable Care Act premium tax credits through 2028. Monthly premiums stay lower for people who buy their own coverage on the marketplace.
Share of each party voting yes
Democrats 100%, Republicans 8%. Share of each party voting yes. - Voted yes
Market-Based Premium Relief
The House Republicans' health package. It expands association health plans, lets employers fund workers' own coverage, funds ACA cost-sharing payments, and adds PBM transparency rules. It does not extend the enhanced subsidies.
Share of each party voting yes
Democrats 0%, Republicans >99%. Share of each party voting yes. Make ACA Subsidies Permanent
Makes the enhanced ACA premium tax credits permanent. More people qualify for marketplace subsidies, and the subsidies stay larger, for good.
Cosponsored it, share of today’s members
Democrats 74%, Republicans 0%. Cosponsored it, share of today’s members.Rein In Drug Middlemen
Reins in the pharmacy benefit managers who sit between drugmakers and pharmacies. It curbs tactics like “spread pricing,” requires PBMs to pass manufacturer rebates through to health plans, and unlinks their pay from a drug's list price.
Cosponsored it, share of today’s members
Democrats 14%, Republicans 19%. Cosponsored it, share of today’s members.Health Care Price Transparency
Writes hospital and insurer price-transparency rules into law. Hospitals, insurers, labs, imaging providers, and surgery centers would have to post the actual prices they charge, so patients can compare.
Cosponsored it, share of today’s members
Democrats <1%, Republicans <1%. Cosponsored it, share of today’s members.
1 to 5 of 93 more measures exist only in the Senate, so they are not shown here.
How McCaul has acted on the key bills behind the issues Americans care about most: a floor vote where one exists, and cosponsorship otherwise. Only measures the House can act on are counted. Open an issue to see each bill, McCaul’s position on it and how both parties split. No recorded action is not opposition.
Share this record
Measures a majority of Republican voters want and McCaul has not cosponsored or voted for; pick one.
Every card is generated from today's data and carries its source. Take it and post it. You do not need to credit Project Curia. The card already does.
Bioguide ID M001157. Member data: unitedstates/congress-legislators. Headshot: unitedstates/images.
McCaul on reform
No documented cosponsorship of the 6 reforms with a current bill. The seventh has no bill this Congress and is not counted. Not on record is not opposition.
Not on record unless marked
- Voters in favor of the question asked: Democrats 84%, Republicans 75%, Independents 81%
Verasight for the Brennan Center for Justice (an advocacy organization), Apr-May 2026
Voters asked: A constitutional amendment establishing that the federal and state governments may regulate and limit contributions to campaigns and campaign spending, including by placing greater limits on corporations than on individuals
- Voters in favor of the question asked: Democrats 88%, Republicans 85%, Independents 84%
Verasight for the Brennan Center for Justice (an advocacy organization), Apr-May 2026
Voters asked: A law that requires all organizations that spend money on federal campaigns to disclose their major donors and requires online political ads to say who paid for them
- Voters in favor of the question asked: Democrats 79%, Republicans 65%, Independents 70%
Emerson College / RealClear, commissioned by Unite America (an advocacy organization), Jan 2026
Voters asked: States should be required to hold open primaries where all voters can participate regardless of party registration.
- Voters in favor of the question asked: Democrats 76%, Republicans 57%, Independents 72%
Noble Predictive Insights for Common Cause (an advocacy organization), Sept 2025
Voters asked: Do you think it is good or bad for the country when one political party controls how voting districts are drawn?
- Voters in favor of the question asked: Democrats 88%, Republicans 87%, Independents 81%
U. of Maryland PPC, May 2023
Voters asked: Prohibit Members of Congress (in the House and Senate) and the family that lives with them, from trading stocks in individual companies. They would still be allowed to buy or sell shares of mutual funds or index funds that include stocks in numerous companies. In conclusion, do you favor or oppose this proposal?
- Voters in favor of the question asked: Democrats 67%, Republicans 65%, Independents not reported
U. of Maryland PPC, June 2022
Voters asked: Extend the period former Members of Congress must wait before lobbying Congress to five years.
- Voters in favor of the question asked: Democrats 74%, Republicans 71%, Independents not reported
U. of Maryland PPC, June 2022
Voters asked: Ban former senior Executive Branch officials from lobbying on behalf of a foreign government for the rest of their life.
Each marked row names what the member did: sponsored or cosponsored a bill carrying the reform, signed a discharge petition to force one to the floor, or cosponsored a prior version in a previous Congress while still serving today. Not on record means there is no documented signal. The member may still support or oppose; we have no evidence either way. Floor votes are not yet wired in, so nobody is marked Opposes.
Several reforms have bills carried almost entirely by one party. That makes the headline percentage a measure of cosponsorship on these specific bills, not a measure of underlying agreement with the reform. A 0% figure for one party often means “has not cosponsored this vehicle,” not “opposes the reform.”
A matching prior Congress cosponsorship also counts. No documented cosponsorship is not opposition.
Share this record
One reform at a time
Where McCaul stands on the six reforms with a current bill. Prior matching cosponsorships are included.
Each card pairs a single reform with what McCaul's own party's voters say about it. A filled dot means McCaul cosponsored a bill. An open dot means no public position, which is not a vote against.
Every card is generated from today's data and carries its source. Take it and post it. You do not need to credit Project Curia. The card already does.
Bioguide ID M001157. Member data: unitedstates/congress-legislators. Headshot: unitedstates/images.