Closed record ·Former U.S. Representative ·Georgia ·District 14
Marjorie Taylor Greene
- Party
- Republican
- Left office
A closed record holds what Greene filed and did in office. No new votes or terms are added; a disclosure covering their time in office that is filed after they left is still added when it arrives. No grade is given to a closed record.
180 votes total · 23 broke with party
- HR 4776Dec 18, 2025Environmental ProtectionPassed ChamberNot voting
SPEED Act
House vote · 221-196
Democrats11-195Republicans210-1What this does
This bill rewrites NEPA to speed federal permitting and shrink environmental review: it declares NEPA purely procedural, narrows reviewable effects to proximate causes, sets hard permitting deadlines, locks completed reviews and authorizations in place, and sharply limits court challenges (substantial deference, remand-only remedy, 150-day filing bar).
Single-subject. Every section amends the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). There is no unrelated rider. A yes vote is a vote on one thing: restructuring NEPA review, deadlines, and litigation.
- HR 1366Dec 18, 2025Public Lands and Natural ResourcesPassed ChamberNot voting
Mining Regulatory Clarity Act
House vote · 219-198
Democrats9-197Republicans210-1What this does
This bill expands how much public land a hardrock mining operator can claim for mining support activities. It amends Section 2337 of the Revised Statutes so an operator holding a lode or placer claim may locate as many mill sites as are reasonably necessary for its operations under an approved plan of operations. A mill site covers waste rock or tailings disposal and other work incident to mineral development. Each single mill site is capped at 5 acres. A mill site conveys no mineral rights and cannot be patented, and it may sit on the same tract of public land as an existing lode or placer claim. The bill also creates the Abandoned Hardrock Mine Fund in the Treasury. Claim maintenance fees collected on these new mill sites are deposited into the Fund, and the Interior Secretary may spend that money without further appropriations only to carry out the abandoned mine land program in section 40704 of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. The final section rewrites fee references in the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 to point at current mining law citations.
Every operative part serves the one subject the title claims, hardrock mining regulation. The multiple mill site provision, the Abandoned Hardrock Mine Fund fed by fees on those same mill sites, and the clerical fee reference fixes all bear on how hardrock claims and their fees work. There is no unrelated rider.
- HR 845Dec 18, 2025AnimalsPassed ChamberNot voting
Pet and Livestock Protection Act
House vote · 211-204
Democrats5-200Republicans206-4What this does
This bill strips the gray wolf of Endangered Species Act protection and shields that action from the courts. It requires the Secretary of the Interior, within 60 days of enactment, to reissue the 2020 final rule that removed the gray wolf from the list of endangered and threatened wildlife. It provides that the reissuance of that rule shall not be subject to judicial review.
The operative text serves one subject, but the plain-language title omits what the bill actually does. The title names pet and livestock protection, while the two operative sections order the reissuance of the gray wolf delisting rule and bar any court from reviewing it. The reader cannot tell from the title that the bill removes a species from the endangered list and forecloses legal challenge.
- HR 498Dec 18, 2025HealthPassed ChamberNot voting
Do No Harm in Medicaid Act
House vote · 215-201
Democrats4-201Republicans211-0What this does
Bars federal Medicaid matching funds for gender transition procedures provided to anyone under 18. Section 2 amends section 1903(i) of the Social Security Act to deny federal payment for 'specified gender transition procedures' furnished to a minor enrolled in a state Medicaid plan or waiver, including funds to administer any state program that furnishes such procedures to minors. A new section 1905(kk) defines the covered procedures as surgeries (the text lists castration, sterilization, hysterectomy, mastectomy, phalloplasty, vaginoplasty, and others), chest or genital implants, and puberty-blocking drugs or cross-sex hormones, when done to change a minor's body so it no longer corresponds to the individual's sex. Exceptions cover treating precocious puberty, medically verifiable genetic disorders of sex development, infection, disease, or injury including complications caused by an earlier such procedure, and reconstruction to reverse a prior procedure. The section defines 'sex,' 'male,' and 'female' in biological reproductive terms.
Single subject. The bill amends Medicaid funding law in one direction, to prohibit federal payment for the defined procedures for minors, with definitions and medical exceptions all serving that prohibition. The title matches the content.
- HR 3492Dec 17, 2025Crime and Law EnforcementPassed ChamberYea
Protect Children’s Innocence Act
House vote · 216-211
Democrats3-207Republicans213-4What this does
This bill rewrites the federal crime at Section 116 of title 18 to make it a felony to perform gender-transition surgeries or administer transition-related drugs to anyone under 18. It sets a penalty of a fine, up to 10 years in prison, or both for knowingly performing genital or bodily mutilation on a minor, for chemically castrating a minor, or for facilitating, consenting to, or transporting a minor for female genital mutilation. The offense reaches conduct connected to interstate or foreign commerce, including travel, payments, communications, or instruments that crossed state lines. The bill defines genital or bodily mutilation to include female genital mutilation and, separately, a list of surgeries performed to change a person's body to a sex differing from their biological sex, such as castration, hysterectomy, mastectomy, phalloplasty, and vaginoplasty, along with feminizing or masculinizing facial surgery and chest or gluteal implants for those purposes. It defines chemical castration to include puberty-blocking drugs, cross-sex testosterone given to biological females, and cross-sex estrogen given to biological males. The minor who receives the procedure may not be arrested or prosecuted. Exceptions cover care necessary to a minor's physical health, births, and specified intersex or precocious-puberty conditions, and the bill states that a minor's health does not include mental, behavioral, or emotional distress or disorder.
The operative text serves one subject, but the plain-language title omits what the bill actually targets. The title speaks of preventing mutilation and chemical castration of minors, while the defined terms make the core prohibition a ban on gender-transition surgery and puberty-blocking or cross-sex hormone treatment for anyone under 18. The reader cannot see from the title that gender-transition surgery and puberty-blocking or cross-sex hormone treatment for minors is the conduct being criminalized, or that the bill defines mental and emotional health out of the medical-necessity exception.
- HR 3616Dec 17, 2025EnergyPassed ChamberYea
Reliable Power Act
House vote · 225-203
Democrats7-203Republicans218-0What this does
This bill amends the Federal Power Act to give the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission a review role over other agencies' regulations when the power grid is judged short on generation. It directs the Electric Reliability Organization to produce an annual long-term assessment of whether the bulk-power system can supply enough electricity to maintain reliability, including under extreme weather, and whether more generation is needed. If that assessment finds the system at risk of inadequate generation, the ERO must publicly notify the Commission that the grid is in a state of generation inadequacy. The Commission then notifies the Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, and any other agency it deems appropriate. Once notified, each of those agencies must submit any covered agency action to the Commission for review and comment before finalizing it. A covered agency action is a regulation that relates to or directly affects any generation resource in the bulk-power system. The agency may not finalize the regulation until it responds in writing to the Commission's comments and the Commission finds the action is not likely to have a significant negative impact on the grid's ability to supply enough electricity for reliability. Comments, recommendations, and responses must be placed in the rulemaking docket or made public.
One subject carried through a chain of steps. Everything in the bill builds the same mechanism. The grid-adequacy finding triggers a Commission review gate that other agencies must clear before finalizing regulations that affect power generation. Why it matters is in that gate: a regulation affecting generation cannot be finalized until the Commission signs off that it will not significantly harm grid reliability, so the review is a precondition, not just advice. The title matches the content.
- HCONRES 61Dec 17, 2025International AffairsFailedNay
Removing U.S. Forces from Western-Hemisphere Terrorist Hostilities
House vote · 210-216
Democrats208-2Republicans2-214Official title: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with presidentially designated terrorist organizations in the Western Hemisphere.
What this does
This concurrent resolution would direct the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1544(c)), to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with any presidentially designated terrorist organization in the Western Hemisphere, unless authorized by a declaration of war or a specific congressional authorization for use of military force against such organization. The resolution consists of a single operative clause carrying that direction. It did not pass the House (vote 210-216).
A single-clause concurrent resolution with one directive. No separate or unrelated provisions are attached.
- HCONRES 64Dec 17, 2025International AffairsFailedYeaBroke with party
Directing Removal of US Forces from Hostilities Against Venezuela
House vote · 211-213
Democrats208-1Republicans3-212Official title: To direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against Venezuela that have not been authorized by Congress.
What this does
This resolution would have directed the President to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities within or against Venezuela, unless those hostilities were explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or a specific statutory authorization for use of military force. It invoked section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution as the mechanism for that direction. The House rejected it 211 to 213, so it did not take effect and no removal was directed.
A single-subject concurrent resolution with one operative directive and no unrelated provisions.
- HR 3632Dec 16, 2025EnergyPassed ChamberYea
Power Plant Reliability Act of 2025
House vote · 222-202
Democrats7-199Republicans215-3What this does
The bill rewrites Section 207 of the Federal Power Act to let the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission require power plants to keep running and to require years of advance notice before a plant retires. When a state commission or Transmission Organization complains that interstate service is inadequate, or likely to become inadequate within five years, the Commission must determine adequate service and may issue an order requiring an electric generating unit to continue operating. Such an order cannot compel building new generating facilities but must set a rate or charge to compensate the owner for the added costs of continued operation. Orders last no longer than five years and may be extended for up to another five years on request. An action taken to comply with such an order that causes noncompliance with a federal, state, or local environmental law is shielded from being treated as a violation and from civil, criminal, or citizen-suit liability under that environmental law. Separately, an owner or operator planning to retire a generating unit of at least 5 megawatts connected to the bulk-power system must notify the Commission and affected state commissions at least five years in advance, except for retirements caused by unplanned catastrophe or emergency; the Commission must make each notice public.
Single subject. Both operative pieces, the continued-operation authority and the advance-retirement-notice requirement, are folded into one rewritten section of the Federal Power Act and match the title. The environmental-law liability shield is an integral part of the continued-operation mechanism, not a separate rider.
- HR 4371Dec 16, 2025ImmigrationPassed ChamberYea
Kayla Hamilton Act
House vote · 225-201
Democrats7-201Republicans218-0What this does
This bill rewrites the rules for how the government screens, detains, and places unaccompanied alien children in its custody. Before the Department of Health and Human Services can make a placement, it must consult with the Department of Homeland Security and the Attorney General to ensure the child will appear at immigration proceedings and be protected from traffickers and gangs, and to determine whether the child is a flight risk, a danger, or has a criminal record. For a child 12 or older, HHS must contact the child's home-country consulate to obtain arrest and conviction records and examine the child for gang-related tattoos or markings. A child may not be released on their own recognizance. A child 12 or older must be placed in a secure facility for the duration of proceedings if they are a flight risk or a danger, including if they have a gang-related tattoo, a serious criminal conviction, an aggravated felony conviction, or any arrest, charge, pending proceeding, or conviction connected to gang activity. The bill bars placing a child with any sponsor who is not a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident, or who lives in a household with anyone convicted of listed crimes including sex offenses, human trafficking, domestic violence, child abuse, murder or manslaughter, child sexual abuse material offenses, any aggravated felony, any felony, or any crime punishable by more than one year. Before any placement, HHS must give DHS identifying and background information on the sponsor and every adult in the household, including names, Social Security or taxpayer ID numbers, dates of birth, address, immigration status, contact information, and results of sex-offender, public-records, and fingerprint-based national criminal background checks. It also amends the Homeland Security Act to route placement determinations through these standards. The bill lets the named agencies bypass the Paperwork Reduction Act and the Administrative Procedure Act where they determine compliance would impede immediate implementation, and it includes a severability clause. It applies to placement and custody determinations pending or occurring on or after enactment, and to all release redeterminations.
Single subject. Every section serves one aim: tightening the screening, detention, and sponsor-vetting rules for unaccompanied alien children. The Paperwork Reduction Act and Administrative Procedure Act carve-outs and the severability clause are implementation mechanics for that same subject, not separate policy riders. The title matches the operative text.
- S 284Dec 15, 2025CongressBecame LawNayBroke with party
Congressional Award Program Reauthorization Act
House vote · 370-22
Democrats194-0Republicans176-22What this does
This law keeps the Congressional Award program alive. The program's authority had lapsed on October 1, 2023. The law amends the Congressional Award Act to strike that date and insert October 1, 2028, and makes the extension retroactive to October 1, 2023 so there is no gap. It also drops the fixed requirement that each award medal be made of gold-plate over bronze, rhodium over bronze, or bronze, and removes the cross-reference tying medal striking to that composition rule.
Both operative sections amend the Congressional Award Act itself. One resets the sunset date so the program continues. The other loosens the rule on what the medals are made of. Both serve the single subject of reauthorizing and adjusting the same program the title names.
- HR 3187Dec 15, 2025Public Lands and Natural ResourcesPassed ChamberYea
Perry County Forest Service Land Conveyance
House vote · 388-0
Democrats191-0Republicans197-0Official title: To require the Secretary of Agriculture to convey a parcel of property of the Forest Service to Perry County, Arkansas, and for other purposes.
What this does
The bill directs the Secretary of Agriculture to transfer roughly 0.81 acres of Forest Service land at 1069 Fourche Avenue in Perryville, Arkansas, to Perry County if the county requests it in writing within 180 days of enactment. The conveyance is made at no cost by quitclaim deed, subject to valid existing rights, and the county pays all costs including any survey, environmental analysis, and historic-preservation review. The land may be used only for public purposes such as education and youth development, and it reverts to the United States, at the Secretary's discretion, if that use ends. The Secretary is not required to provide any covenant or warranty for the property.
Single subject. The bill covers one land transfer to one county, and the descriptive title matches the content.
- HR 3668Dec 12, 2025EnergyPassed ChamberYea
Improving Interagency Coordination for Pipeline Reviews Act
House vote · 213-184
Democrats7-182Republicans206-2What this does
This bill centralizes federal environmental review of natural gas pipeline projects at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. For authorizations under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act and certificates under section 7, FERC acts as the only lead agency for review under the National Environmental Policy Act, and every other agency must give maximum deference to the scope FERC sets. FERC must identify agencies with a role within 30 days, invite them within 45 days, and designate participating agencies within 60 days; agencies that are not designated cannot run a supplemental NEPA review (outside a narrow legal-necessity exception) and their comments are neither considered nor entered into the record. The bill waives the Clean Water Act section 401 state water-quality certification for these authorizations, though a state may propose water-quality conditions that FERC may adopt if it finds them necessary. Federal authorization decisions are due within 90 days after FERC finishes its NEPA review, agencies must work on concurrent schedules and report progress, and FERC must consult the Transportation Security Administration on the applicant's pipeline security.
One subject, permitting of natural gas pipelines under the Natural Gas Act, handled in a single section. Worth flagging that beyond coordinating agency timelines the bill also removes the Clean Water Act section 401 state certification requirement for these projects, a substantive change that reaches past pure interagency coordination but stays within the pipeline-review subject.
- HR 2550Dec 11, 2025Labor and EmploymentPassed ChamberNay
Protect America's Workforce Act
House vote · 231-195
Democrats211-0Republicans20-195What this does
This bill cancels one executive order and protects existing union contracts for federal workers.
Single-subject. Both operative sections address the same matter: federal labor-management relations. Section 2 nullifies the executive order that excluded agencies from those programs. Section 3 preserves the collective bargaining agreements that order threatened. Preserving the contracts is the direct corollary of cancelling the order. No unrelated rider rides along, so a yes vote carried one thing.
- HR 3383Dec 11, 2025Finance and Financial SectorBundledPassed ChamberYea
Incentivizing New Ventures and Economic Strength Through Capital Formation Act of 2025
House vote · 302-123
Democrats87-123Republicans215-0What this does
This bill loosens federal securities rules to widen access to private and early-stage capital markets. It bars the SEC from prohibiting or limiting closed-end funds from investing in private funds, and bars exchanges from restricting the listing of such funds. It rewrites the "accredited investor" definition so that more people qualify: it keeps the $1 million net-worth and $200,000/$300,000 income tests, and adds licensed brokers and investment advisers, people the SEC certifies as having relevant knowledge, and people who pass a new SEC-created accredited-investor exam offered free to the public. It raises the crowdfunding investment cap from $100,000 to $250,000, with SEC discretion to go up to $400,000. It raises the private-fund adviser registration exemption from $150 million to $175 million in assets. It raises the "qualifying venture capital fund" limits from 250 to 500 investors and from $10 million to $50 million. It lets any issuer, not just emerging growth companies, "test the waters" with investors and submit draft registration statements for confidential SEC review before going public. It expands well-known seasoned issuer status to companies with a $400 million public float. Congress paired these changes with investor-side provisions: it requires the SEC to allow electronic delivery of investor disclosures while preserving a paper opt-out, creates a Senior Investor Taskforce inside the SEC to study elder financial exploitation, and requires new disclosure of voting power at companies with multi-class share structures. The House passed it on December 11, 2025.
Bundle. A single yes vote carried more than two dozen distinct securities-law changes packaged as one act. The coupling point is capital formation: nearly every section loosens a rule that limits who can invest in private or early-stage offerings, or lowers the cost of going and staying public. But the sections are otherwise independent bills. Redefining who counts as an accredited investor (Sec. 201, 203), letting closed-end funds hold private funds (Sec. 206), raising crowdfunding caps (Sec. 103), standing up a Senior Investor Taskforce (Sec. 204), and mandating electronic delivery of disclosures (Sec. 205) share a policy area but not a single subject. Each carries its own short-title-style heading, the signature of a formerly standalone bill folded into the package. A member could not vote against the accredited-investor exam without also voting against the senior-investor protections and the closed-end fund provision that is the act's stated purpose.
- HR 3898Dec 11, 2025Environmental ProtectionPassed ChamberYea
PERMIT Act
House vote · 221-205
Democrats6-204Republicans215-1What this does
Rewrites a broad set of Clean Water Act permitting rules under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act across 25 substantive sections. It requires water-quality standards, criteria, and technology determinations to weigh the cost and commercial availability in the United States of the treatment technologies that compliance would require. It overhauls the section 401 state water-quality certification process, tying certification decisions only to compliance with sections 301, 302, 303, 306, and 307, setting a one-year decision window and a 90-day deadline for the certifying authority to identify needed materials, and adding an expedited judicial-review track for energy infrastructure and FERC-related certifications. It extends NPDES permit terms from five years to ten years and section 404 general permits from five to ten years. It exempts from permitting the discharge of pesticides authorized under FIFRA and agricultural stormwater that flows in direct response to precipitation. It narrows 'navigable waters' to exclude groundwater, ephemeral features that flow only after precipitation, waste-treatment system components, and certain prior-converted cropland. It deems discharges of dredged or fill material into less than 3 acres of navigable waters a minimal adverse environmental effect, ratifies the Michigan, New Jersey, and Florida section 404 permit programs and bars EPA from withdrawing their approval without an Act of Congress, revises compensatory-mitigation rules, and directs backlog reduction and a state-led water-quality pilot. A final section authorizes the International Boundary and Water Commission to accept Federal and non-Federal funds for wastewater treatment, water conservation, and flood control works along the United States-Mexico border.
One Act that packages 25 distinct reforms, nearly all amending the Federal Water Pollution Control Act on a single theme of clean-water permitting. The title's phrase 'and other matters' signals the breadth. The last section (26) reaches outside that statute to expand the funding authority of the International Boundary and Water Commission, a separate agency handling United States-Mexico border water works, so that provision sits at the edge of the bill's stated subject. It is carried as an ordinary section rather than a separate division, and the rest of the Act coheres around clean-water permitting.
- HR 3638Dec 11, 2025EnergyPassed ChamberYea
Electric Supply Chain Act
House vote · 267-159
Democrats51-159Republicans216-0What this does
This bill directs the Secretary of Energy to prepare recurring assessments of the supply chain for generating and transmitting electricity and to report on them to Congress. The assessments must cover ways to strengthen and expand the supply chain, including deployment of advanced transmission technologies; trends, risks, and vulnerabilities in the supply and availability of components; national and energy security considerations, including efforts by a foreign entity of concern to exploit disruptions to undermine U.S. leadership in artificial intelligence; barriers to domestic manufacturing and to processing critical materials; the effects of U.S. reliance on any foreign entity of concern; workforce challenges, including vulnerabilities from employing any non-U.S. citizen at a U.S. generation or transmission facility; and opportunities to expand the workforce among veterans, transitioning servicemembers, and military spouses. Each assessment must identify emerging issues and recommend how to address them. The Secretary must submit a report on the most recent assessment to the House Energy and Commerce Committee and the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee within one year of enactment and periodically after that. The bill creates no new program or funding; it defines terms such as critical material and foreign entity of concern by reference to existing law.
Single subject. The bill does one thing: require Department of Energy assessments and reports on the electricity supply chain. The remaining text is definitions.
- HR 3628Dec 11, 2025EnergyPassed ChamberYea
State Planning for Reliability and Affordability Act
House vote · 218-207
Democrats4-206Republicans214-1What this does
Adds a new standard to the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) requiring state-regulated electric utilities that use integrated resource planning to include measures ensuring reliable generation over a 10-year period. A 'reliable generation facility' is defined as one that can generate electricity continuously for at least 30 days, has on-site fuel or a secured fuel supply for that period, can operate during emergencies and severe weather, and provides essential grid services such as frequency and voltage support. State regulatory authorities must begin considering the new standard within one year of enactment and complete their determination within two years, though states that have already implemented a comparable standard, held a proceeding, or had their legislature vote on it in the prior three years are exempt. The Comptroller General must report to Congress within one year on the effectiveness of integrated resource planning before this standard takes effect.
Single subject. Every section serves the one aim of adding and implementing a PURPA reliable-generation standard: the new standard, its conforming amendments, and a GAO report on the same topic. The title matches the operative text.
- S 1071Dec 10, 2025Armed Forces and National SecurityBundledBecame LawNayBroke with party
FY2026 National Defense Authorization Act
House vote · 312-112
Democrats115-94Republicans197-18Official title: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026
What this does
This is the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026, the annual law that sets defense policy and authorizes military spending. Organized into eight divisions, it authorizes appropriations for procurement, operations, military construction, Department of Energy national security programs, and the Coast Guard, and it sets personnel levels and pay policy. It also folds in a State Department authorization and an intelligence authorization for the year. Its final division, "Other Matters," carries a long list of provisions with little or no connection to defense, including an extension of the Defense Production Act, new securities-disclosure rules for foreign company insiders, a reauthorization of a child-exploitation prevention program, and a new regime restricting certain U.S. investments abroad. That same division repeals both authorizations for the use of military force in Iraq and repeals the Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act of 2019.
This is a genuine bundle. The core seven divisions do the expected defense work, but Division H ("Other Matters") attaches many provisions with no defense nexus. Among them: a one-year extension of the Defense Production Act (Sec. 8101), a securities law change requiring insider disclosures by directors and officers of foreign private issuers (Sec. 8103), a reauthorization of the PROTECT Our Children Act of 2008 (Sec. 8202), an extension of Supreme Court Police protective authority to retired and former justices and their families (Sec. 8201), standalone Taiwan, fentanyl, and Western Balkans titles, a South Pacific tuna treaty implementation, a new outbound-investment screening regime (Title LXXXV, Sec. 8521), the repeal of both Iraq use-of-force authorizations (Sec. 8370), and the repeal of the Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act (Sec. 8369). A reader tracking any one of these riders would not find it under a defense bill's title.
- HR 1676Dec 9, 2025Public Lands and Natural ResourcesPassed ChamberYea
Make SWAPs Efficient Act of 2025
House vote · 400-0
Democrats198-0Republicans202-0What this does
This bill puts the Secretary of the Interior on a clock to approve state wildlife plans. It amends the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act so the Secretary must act on a state's comprehensive plan not later than 180 days after the state submits it. On submission, the Secretary must conditionally authorize the state's wildlife conservation and restoration program and set aside its funds. The Secretary must build a review process that ensures final approval within that 180-day window. If the Secretary does not approve a state's program by June 1 of the year after submission, the Secretary must report to the House Natural Resources Committee and the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee explaining the delay.
Single-subject. The bill is one short-title section and one operative section, and that section amends a single statute, Section 4(e)(3) of the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act. No riders, no unrelated provisions, no divisions.